Shaanxi University of Science and Technology was exposed for recruiting teachers with leading children. How did universities respond?

For the emergence of this situation, then the school also said that because there are leading children among the recruiters, the corresponding inspectors did not avoid it, so these were cancelled, and the candidates of the staff children entered the next recruitment link. I think this is correct. After all, they are the children of the staff, so when they are conducting the assessment, then the assessment party actually has their parents, which is naturally unfair, so the competition is cancelled.

It's normal for this to happen, so if you are a leader's child, then if you are the parents of these leading children during the assessment, then you must avoid it. Otherwise, the examiner is the parent who examines the children, and there will definitely be unfairness. In this case, as a parent, you must avoid it, so this time, his parents did not avoid it and naturally canceled it, leading to the next child.

Fairness is obviously unfair. After all, examiners have their own parents, and it is normal to have deviations in grading. After all, they always want their children to be better, so the grading will be unfair, so it is normal to be cancelled. It will be unfair to other candidates if they are not disqualified. After all, the examiner is their father.

Then for the occurrence of this incident, the school has decided to cancel the qualifications of these two candidates to enter the next recruitment link. After all, their parents didn't avoid the exam, which may lead to unfair conditions in this exam, so they were disqualified.