Is it fair for full-time graduates not to take full-time as a restrictive condition in recruitment?

If we treat full-time and part-time as one thing and simply call them college students, why should we distinguish them? Just as many junior college students express dissatisfaction with many positions as long as undergraduates, is it really fair if we don't distinguish between undergraduate and junior college, and between first and key universities? In the same way, full-time graduates strive to take the college entrance examination and learn cultural knowledge at school. On the one hand, part-time students can find jobs, on the other hand, they can enjoy the same treatment as full-time graduates. After four years, they not only gained relevant professional experience, but also got the same starting point as full-time undergraduates and had their own academic qualifications. Is this fair to full-time undergraduates?

Of course, from another angle, we can also understand it as trying to narrow the gap between members of society, but think about it carefully. In the long process of four years in college, it takes a lot of time, energy and money to serve college students, and every professional course also needs solid study, so the level of professional knowledge will be relatively higher. It is understandable that enterprises give priority to full-time college students when recruiting. The diploma of part-time college students is relatively easy to get, and the gold content is actually not very high. It is ok to improve yourself, but it is unfair to enjoy the same treatment as full-time college students.

Therefore, instead of strengthening formal equality in various ways, it is better to adopt a series of policies to develop employment, whether full-time or part-time, so that everyone can find their own suitable role in society, assume corresponding responsibilities, constantly improve themselves, improve their professional skills and abilities, and improve themselves and achieve themselves in the process of interpersonal communication, thus effectively promoting social equity.