Everyone supports Huawei's annual salary, but everyone is saying, what is this?

Do you know the difference? The difference is that you are from Huawei and get paid outside. As long as you are not bragging, the company will generally not treat you badly. Huawei's talented teenagers are publicized every year, and Huawei's middle managers can confidently say that there is no problem with annual income of several million. Moreover, Huawei actively promotes the news that the annual salary is 200w to recruit talented teenagers, R&D investment (large salary) is the top five in the world, and the per capita income is 800,000. Under the so-called four rewards, there must be a brave man, and if you don't pay a high salary, where can the talents accompany you to the high end to tide over the difficulties?

Not satisfied? I refuse to be interviewed by you. Freshmen can try to be talented teenagers with an income of 200w, and social recruits can apply for senior experts with an annual income of several million. These positions are clearly marked, and talents can enter. How about CICC? Received a salary and was fired overnight. The CSRC has repeatedly issued regulations requiring that the income should not be exposed. Tobacco companies followed suit and issued similar regulations overnight. Huawei offers an annual salary of 2 million, and his conditions are waiting. I can't meet his requirements, and I know that an annual salary of 2 million will bear fruit. /kloc-I can't do it in 0/0 years, so I don't envy those who can. I worship the master.

However, what is the unit of CICC? Finance itself does not create value. Coupled with the infinite explosion of finance in the past two years, everyone has no good impression on finance itself; On the other hand, CICC, as a broken state-owned enterprise, said some unpleasant things and used the state's money to earn money from the real economy. People who do this do not need to wait for conditions, but need contacts to enter. As for what contribution they have made to society? Besides copying some foreign financing schemes that don't work, what else have they created?

There is no doubt that anyone can achieve this result. If you don't believe me, try changing the position of Huawei with an annual salary of 2 million to another person casually and see what results can be achieved in five years. Can it be compared with the results of people who are being asked now? But if you let CICC change a group of people, the results of these people after five years may not be worse than those who earn 100w now.

Although I have done some small work in the financial industry, I think the negative sentiment of the society towards the high salary in the financial industry is beneficial to the development of the national economy. Excessive financialization of the economy is played by Jews. Just like taking drugs, it is harmful to the long-term development of the national economy. It is by no means an advanced economic model. The most intuitive financial high salary will attract a bunch of first-class talents to this industry, which will inevitably lead to the slowdown of industrial and technological progress.

Jews play this Industry-University-Research game, buy scholars to fabricate economic fallacies, then instigate politicians to formulate suspicious economic policies, and then manipulate market arbitrage. Proper financialization is right, which will make some asset-intensive projects that need long-term investment get financial support, but it must be guided by strict policies. As for the financial industry itself, it is really necessary to limit the income level through taxation or other policy means to prevent it from sucking the blood of the industry in turn when it grows bigger. Therefore, I think that overall, I have negative feelings about the high salary in the financial industry, which is beneficial to the development of the country. On the other hand, the society accepts the reality of high salary in finance, and everyone yearns for finance, which proves that Jews are playing that Industry-University-Research fool.

Working in state-owned enterprises, on the one hand, promotes economic development, on the other hand, has the idea of serving the people, and to a certain extent, needs to play the spirit of sacrifice and dedication. Maybe you will say, I work in a state-owned enterprise, which is not so high. I just focus on money. Don't give me big theories, big rules. If you think so, you will lose the attribute of state-owned enterprises, and your selfless dedication to state-owned enterprises is also written in the recruitment contract. If you don't fulfill the responsibility of state-owned enterprises, you won't be able to enter the door of state-owned enterprises. This is a free choice. Once you choose, you can't use state-owned enterprises as a shield, which is actually harming the public and enriching the private interests.

Of course, you have created value, and it is understandable to match the annual salary100W. The problem is that a new trader is doing a job with no technical content. The matching value of others is higher and harder than yours. I still can't get a salary of several thousand yuan a month. In contrast, how can you be calm? ! The problem is that you can keep a straight face and show off in an ostentatious manner. Hu Xijin took pains to tell this group to keep a low profile, and then keep a low profile, but you came out to provoke public anger and refused to listen.

Besides, a financial institution and a monopoly enterprise are not the real economy. Do you get such a high salary? Huawei is a private enterprise, making money in the market, and every penny earned is so hard and bitter. Their annual salary is 200w, and the matching value they create is 200 W. Huawei's chairman is so high-profile, but he is by no means a philanthropist, just another form of Zhou Pipi. I will give you an annual salary of 200w, which is calculated after my hard work, and I won't pay you any more. What's more, it is wayward and has wayward capital.

In the past, some meat eaters suppressed manufacturing state-owned enterprises on the pretext of high welfare and low efficiency, which laid off tens of millions of ordinary workers and left hundreds of millions of families without livelihood security. At the same time, they arranged for their engineering children to be listed overseas by state-owned enterprises in the financial industry, so that their children could get tens of thousands of times the "legitimate" income of ordinary workers. Now that people know the essence of the big laid-off movement in those days, they naturally hate the social moth Admiralty.

Those excuses for the high salary of CICC employees are simply unreasonable and an insult to all working-class intellectuals. Not to mention that under the background that China graduated from hundreds of thousands of doctors a year, Master Jin Zhong was not highly educated at all. Most of the key universities in the 1980s were universities of science and engineering, agriculture and medicine. In those years, the most important universities assigned jobs to manufacturing state-owned enterprises. But how do financial personnel arrange to become conscientious and paid engineers? Create a confrontation between workers and peasants, and use the low income of farmers to imply that the legal income of engineers is too high. Now the common people find that an ordinary financial worker with low academic qualifications can also earn hundreds of times the income of farmers, and financial workers are naturally bitten by the lies of that year.

Ordinary people do not object to Huawei's R&D personnel getting high salaries, let alone AVIC and Sinopec's R&D personnel getting high salaries. Every improvement of the living standard of human society depends on scientific researchers, and China must also rely on scientific researchers to develop into an innovative society in the future. But finance, sorry, the people don't recognize it. It's the same with or without you. Middle East countries are developed countries, with milk and honey and no finance.