The mobile phone configuration is similar to Huawei and Xiaomi. Why do people always think that Huawei is relatively high-end?

Didn't Xiaomi's boss say Xiaomi was a diaosi machine? [Laughter]

Because Huawei has many independent things.

And Huawei's mobile phone optimization is unmatched by other brands.

With the same configuration, how long is Xiaomi Kaka a year, and Huawei can still be strong;

Moreover, after the emergence of HarmonyOS system, the configuration of mobile phones no longer determines the fluency of mobile phones as before;

Xiaomi battery is not durable, Huawei battery is more durable.

Xiaomi can only compare with Huawei, but not as good as Huawei, you can understand.

Xiaomi started a cottage.

Although Huawei's chips can't be produced by itself, they are designed for TSMC OEM, so they match the system well. Some manufacturers such as Xiaomi buy chips directly, which is the gap.

Any commodity also depends on its core technology. Xiaomi follows the thinking of Lenovo trade in the past, which is basically traditional. China industry focuses on assembly and processing trade. When Lei Jun said in a speech that his idol was Liu Chuanzhi, I knew that if Lei Jun wanted to start a business in the future, he would definitely take the road of Lenovo. After all, that road is not difficult, it is easier to walk, and it is in line with the nature of business. The core of the two companies is not at all the same level.

Huawei is taking another hard road. Independent research and development will consume a lot of research and development expenses, time and energy, and may not necessarily have any results. Huawei has persisted in research and development for many years and invested huge manpower and material resources.

We have done a certain degree of independent research and development on parts. On the one hand, Huawei's technology content is higher, on the other hand, everyone admires this spirit of persistently acquiring core technologies. In the long run, the domestic industrial chain developed by Huawei has driven the supporting ecological chain and promoted the development of many industries. For example, BOE, Changjiang Storage and Huaxing Optoelectronics are all in different degrees, because there are orders for technical update iterations. Only products have a market, and technology can iterate.

I won't be stuck by others in the future.

There are too many answers, and some even pull out a lot of product structure and company data comparison. Just before Xiaomi's mobile phone came out, Huawei's mobile phone was basically inferior to ZTE in the three major communications, with three or four hundred low-end machines and more than two thousand high-end machines. HTC and Samsung still dominate Android. After the mobile phone market began to develop slowly, we all know what Huawei thinks is the most important thing at the high end. What was Huawei's annual salary on the Internet at that time? Ordinary employees are 30,000 to 40,000 a month, and technicians are all earning millions a year. Naturally, the general public thinks that Huawei has high salary and good treatment, and things must be high-end products.

It makes no sense to do such a thing with a high-end mobile phone!

Xiaomi was the first to sell cheaply and was famous for its configuration.

What pays attention to configuration and has no money?

My first millet 2S is really easy to use, and it's worth it.

Xiaomi's workmanship was a big problem for some time, which led to a decline in word of mouth, but I heard that the latest flagship workmanship has improved. However, the image of diaosi is deeply rooted in people's hearts.

And the brand name is Xiaomi, which does not sound high-end. Which one, like Huawei and China, has a bright future, desperately grasping the national sentiment, and going up in the high-end atmosphere?