Is there an assessment method for financial work?

There are no national standards, and they are generally set by themselves.

Give you a model essay for your reference.

Measures for the assessment of financial personnel of administrative institutions in Junshan District

Article 1 In order to strengthen the standardized management of financial work of administrative institutions in the whole region, further strengthen the responsibilities of financial personnel, improve work efficiency and work style, these assessment methods are formulated.

Article 2 The evaluation shall adhere to the principles of objectivity, impartiality, democracy, openness and effectiveness.

Article 3 The object of assessment is the financial personnel of administrative institutions in the whole region.

Article 4 The assessment contents include five aspects: morality, ability, diligence, achievement and honesty.

Moral character: the expression of political thought and professional ethics; Ability: professional level and coordination ability, etc. ; Diligence: work attitude, professionalism, etc. Achievements: Fulfill duties and accomplish tasks according to quantity, quality, efficiency, satisfaction of leaders and colleagues. Integrity: honesty and self-discipline, and compliance with fiscal and taxation laws, regulations and rules.

Fifth assessment is based on annual assessment.

Article 6 The assessment shall be based on the combination of leadership and democratic appraisal by the masses, and the combination of peacetime assessment and regular assessment. According to the actual situation, the method of quantitative assessment is adopted.

Seventh assessment by the District Finance Bureau is responsible for organizing the implementation.

Eighth by the District Finance Bureau in conjunction with the District Personnel Bureau set up administrative institutions of financial personnel assessment work leading group. The leading group is headed by the director of the District Finance Bureau, deputy heads of the Finance Bureau and the Personnel Bureau, heads of relevant departments of the Finance Bureau and relevant comrades of the District Personnel Bureau as members.

Article 9 The main duties of the leading group for assessment work are: to organize, guide and supervise the assessment work, and to propose assessment grades; Review the applications of those who refuse to accept the assessment results.

(a) the annual assessment is conducted at the end of the year or the beginning of the following year, and the financial and accounting personnel of administrative institutions who accept the assessment shall write a written annual report;

(two) accounting units according to the annual assessment, comprehensive evaluation, quantitative scoring, put forward evaluation opinions;

(three) the assessment team to review the preliminary assessment order, determine the assessment order, and report the individual assessment results to the personnel department and the original unit for the record.

Tenth annual assessment results are divided into four grades: excellent, competent, basically competent and incompetent. The specific quantitative criteria are: 90 points or above is excellent (including 90 points), 90 points or below is 80 points or above is competent (including 80 points), 80 points or below is basically competent (including 70 points), and 70 points or below is incompetent.

Eleventh District Finance Bureau of the annual assessment of financial personnel identified as excellent grades of notification and recognition, to give certain material rewards; The assessment results will be submitted to the personnel department of the organization as an important basis for the annual assessment of cadres. The annual assessment has been rated as excellent financial personnel for three consecutive times, and suggestions for its use have been put forward to the organization.

Twelfth District Finance Bureau will sort and queue the assessment objects according to the annual assessment results, talk to the financial personnel who rank the last three in the assessment, and order them to make rectification within a time limit; If the financial personnel are "incompetent" in two consecutive annual assessments, the District Finance Bureau will put forward a plan, suggest that the unit adjust its post, and report it to the district party committee and district government, and investigate the leadership responsibility of the person in charge and the person in charge of the unit.

Thirteenth party and government organs financial personnel assessment with reference to these measures.

Fourteenth approach by the District Finance Bureau is responsible for the interpretation of.