Do leaders like slick or honest people in the end, which one will be reused?

Department leaders are now faced with choices like those in the question.

there are two interns in the department, and only one can be retained in the end. Both of them have strong working ability, but their personalities are different.

one is an honest man who works hard and complains; The other is slick, not so obsessed with work, sometimes lazy, but very close to customers.

both of them have advantages that meet the requirements of the team and disadvantages that we are worried about. Just to share with you the current choices and opinions of the leaders.

one. Advantages and disadvantages of an honest man

1. Appreciate the reliability of an honest man

After several months of internship, all colleagues, including leaders, agree that this honest comrade is very reliable.

Under the pressure of not having any holidays, traveling for a long time and working more than 12 hours a day, he didn't complain publicly and was irritable, and his mood was very stable.

No matter what kind of work, it is not picky and has a high degree of cooperation;

it is very rare that in a very tired state, his work will not cut corners, and it is completed with good quality and quantity.

what project-based work needs most is that everyone's ability, cooperation and dedication are basically the same.

Honest people don't have too many small personalities, they always take the right path in doing things, and they are quick to integrate into the team, so it is not easy for individuals to have accidents.

2. Worried that honest people are not strong enough

This strength is from the perspective of customers. Although we are Party B providing services for enterprises, we are also experts in solving problems.

In practical work, enterprises are often unwilling to cooperate or find reasons to refute our demands.

at this time, honest people become soft persimmons and can't control the enterprise.

blindly making concessions will only lead to the inability to carry out business, and in the end, it will leave customers with the impression that we are incompetent.

so, in the eyes of leaders, this is the most worrying place for honest people.

second, slick and honest people are just the opposite

Another candidate is a small public relations expert.

on the first day of the project, he gave a box of peaches to the customer's financial department to deal with the financial girls;

moreover, he was never afraid of fighting with the company. The demands kicked back by the company can always be kicked back. His attitude is very polite, and he never loses his aura. Finally, when the company feels guilty, he will give in. This skill is deeply appreciated by leaders.

However, the shortcomings are also very obvious. He doesn't use 1% of his strength in his work, and always leaves room for slacking off, taking shortcuts, etc., and the work entrusted to him is always not very reassuring.

Although the courage is commendable, the leaders are worried about their lack of heart and skill.

Third, the leaders will carefully consider it from the objective demand level

We prefer the first person, but the leaders prefer the second one. His reason is that there is no shortage of serious people in the team now, but there are not many who can support the scene alone, and the quality of talents should be balanced.

It can be seen that the more serious a leader is, the more carefully he will choose talents.

The most basic thing is that the working attitude and ability must meet the standards. On this basis, look at the shortcomings of the team, where to make up for the lack, and achieve synergy.

Finally, the leader should also consider the issue of internal checks and balances. Now there is a colleague in the team who likes to play tricks and shirk his work.

Maybe find another one who can kick the ball the same or even better than him. The two of them have internal friction, so other colleagues don't have to worry about the ball being kicked on their heads.

Fourth, off the charts's comprehensive ability must be reused

Besides the well-known work and social skills,

the most important thing to emphasize is to do a good job in the leadership.

There is a young colleague in the team. He is so good that the leader asked the company to make an exception and open a quota to recruit.

When he was an intern, working overtime and staying up late, exquisite and rigorous copywriting, and all kinds of computer skills were nothing. He learned new things in minutes, and he could be perfect when he learned them ...

Everyone was afraid to accompany the leader to visit the work, and he was comfortable with it.

The leader who meets the customs clearance only needs to rest and wait, translate and explain, accompany him every day, live in the standard room, live in the suite, lead the business class in the economy class, etc. After the whole interview, the leader is only responsible for leisure and vacation, and he is responsible for all the work.

in the end, this colleague will be praised almost every time at the wine bureau. The young man's career is just like opening a plug-in, and he has been the backbone of the business for one year.

On the whole, I think the leader's preference for honest people or slick people has little to do with his subjective preference.

Because recruiting people comes in to do things, not to study and decorate, it mainly depends on what kind of talents are lacking at the moment. As long as the final work can be done well, the leader will like it.

However, the subsequent promotion has a lot to do with the subjective judgment of the leaders. After all, this is the choice of the best, and the hard skills and soft power must surpass those of colleagues to shine in the crowd.