The pleasure and trouble of peeping through the back window?

Hitchcock is a director who is good at expressing pictures. He tells stories entirely by pictures rather than by words. For example, the reason why Jeff broke his leg is not explained in the film. He just shook the camera in the dangerous emergency photos, which not only showed his occupation, but also explained the reason for his broken leg, and even suggested that he might be spying on his neighbors out of professional habits. For example, Lisa found a wedding ring and put it on Jeff's hand, which not only shows that she found evidence of a crime, but also strongly shows that she wants to run a married life with him. Of course, the most intuitive picture comes from the end of the film. Jeff sat with a broken leg and couldn't move, while Lisa sat aside, put down the newspaper and smiled at him. The implication is that Jeff planted in front of her can never escape from her palm ... but the seemingly happy ending is still not perfect, because once Jeff recovers, it is out of her control. This is the same reason that gary grant agreed to marry Grace Kelly. He is also the heroine of this film, but in Catch a Thief, he wants to live with his mother. It can be said that Hitchcock's films throughout his life repeatedly showed his male chauvinism theme. No matter how excellent modern women are, they are unconditionally in the inferior group of love and marriage, which is the limitation of the owner (perhaps not the limitation) or the historical limitation. The film also clearly restores people's daily life. Even in the voyeuristic state of the audience, I miss lonely hearts, frustrated composers and dancers who deal with men ... I especially show the audience the process of marriage from sweetness (the newlyweds make love behind closed doors all day) to boredom and even hatred (the murderer and his sick wife). Although it's only an example, Jeff saw it all. I'm afraid his rejection of Lisa is one of the reasons.