The debate about commitment can also be the latest! ! !

Dui should try to direct argumentative writing by himself.

First, the demonstration requirements

1. This argument should be correct.

The correct statement is in line with the objective laws of things and people's concepts of right and wrong.

People often have different views on something or a problem. These views cannot be simply distinguished by right or wrong. For example, there are many different views in the article "Lost Street Pavilion": Ma Su should be beheaded, and we should not make Marek Su's proud mistake; Masu is good, he made a mistake, did not escape, did not shirk, and dared to take responsibility; Zhuge Liang was to blame, and the failure of the campaign was mainly caused by his improper employment; Zhuge Liang is worth learning. He can act according to the law, without favoritism. These different viewpoints are all reasonable because of different perspectives and can be used as arguments. But this does not mean that any viewpoint, any position or any angle can be used for argument. The viewpoint used for argumentation should be a reasonable viewpoint that stands in the position of the majority, the overall situation and the long-term position. In the face of several correct viewpoints, we should pay attention to choosing the pertinent, innovative and easy-to-grasp viewpoints as much as possible.

2. The argument should be targeted

Targeted, mainly emphasizing the practical and educational significance of the argument. For example, if we think that the problem of shirking responsibility is serious at present, we can talk about how Masu dares to take responsibility; If you think that some cadres have serious problems of favoritism at present, you can praise Zhuge Liang for not favoritism.

3. The argument should be original.

Some great truths, although correct, may be known to everyone, and there is no point in writing any more. Therefore, when demonstrating, we should dare to doubt and explore boldly. As long as we are willing to think, we can put forward new ideas.

For example, the idiom "just make up a few words" has always been used to satirize people who have no real talent and learning, and mix with experts to make up a few words. When we can completely break this routine and make innovations, for example, we can point the finger at Wang Xuan, a big country, and even a fake expert has infiltrated the palace, which shows that the recruitment of musicians has not fulfilled the audit procedures. The chaos of Qi's statutes can be seen from this. Secondly, it is not difficult to find Mr. Nanguo's disguise, but no one told the King of Qi the truth, which shows that Qi Xuanwang's governance was blocked. Seeing the big from the small, national affairs will be cheated, and the problem will be serious.

Second, the requirements of the demonstration

Correct views often fail to convince readers; You must produce enough evidence to be convincing. Argument is the basis to prove the argument, the basis of argumentative writing, and the answer to the question "What to prove". Some arguments are accepted truths, while others are objective facts. No matter what kind of argument, to be very convincing, it needs to be true, full, typical and fresh.

1. The argument should be true.

The materials used as arguments must be true and conclusive, and cannot be imagined or fabricated out of thin air, nor can they be distorted at will. The cutting and generalization of materials cannot change their properties, and important parts cannot be omitted. Advanced theory must be based on facts, and any inaccuracy may damage the whole theory.

2. The argument should be sufficient

Full argument means that there are enough materials to prove the argument. The materials used as arguments should fully reflect the essence of things. Only in this way can the argument be thorough, powerful and convincing.

3. The argument should be typical.

Arguments are typical, that is, the materials used as arguments should be representative and universal, reflect the essence of things, and have distinctive personality and weight.

Typical materials can first reflect the universality of materials. This kind of material has the essential attributes of similar things, which can be inferred from other things and is the representative of similar things. Typical materials are also materials with a unity of personality and * * *. This material is both representative and vivid. It proves the argument with the nature of * *, and embodies the inherent and inevitable connection between arguments. At the same time, it shocked the reader's mind with its distinctive personality and greatly enhanced its persuasiveness. First of all, we should pay attention to celebrity material, but we can't limit it to celebrities. "Ordinary trivia" can also be used as an argument as long as it can reflect the essence of things to the extreme.

Fresh materials are a powerful pillar of the novel's arguments and ideas. Those old materials that have been dulled by readers' audio and video can no longer cause surprises and lack the impact on the soul, which is not conducive to the expression of the argument. Even if the argument is not novel, it can give people new knowledge and lessons because of the use of new materials.

Third, the requirements of the demonstration

1. development view

Step 2 contact the point of view

3. Dichotomy point of view

Fourth, a reasonable argument structure.

1. In the way of argument, either arguments are tied or arguments are tied.

2. Contrastive in argumentative writing, two things (or opinions) are compared, or another thing (or opinion) is used to set off one thing (or opinion).

3. In argumentation thinking, step by step, step by step, step by step.

4. The total score formula in argumentative thinking is always said first and then divided, or divided first and then always said, or always said first and then divided and then always said.

Fourth, arguments must be linked with practical problems.

People write articles to solve one or some problems. Argumentative writing must be more directly related to the actual problems in real life, and feel it.

Connecting with the problems in real life, we should consider how to present facts (the facts we are most familiar with are not necessarily allusions), make sense (the truth we really want to understand is not necessarily famous sayings), and express our opinions as fully as possible.

When conducting argumentation, we should contact the problems in real life, and form the good habit of reading miscellaneous books, observing frequently, communicating more and thinking deeply.

Example:

Where is the beauty of "dewdrop"

Everyone has a love of beauty. People of all ages want to show their best. Since ancient times, China has regarded Wenzhou as a state of etiquette, and folk costumes are varied so far. However, with the development of the times, another fashion has emerged, with "dew" as the beauty.

Nowadays, in the streets and alleys, beautiful women float across the street like clouds, followed by disabled people. There are no ugly women in this era. Girls spend more and more money on clothes, and their thoughts are more and more refined, but there are fewer and fewer clothes. Is this beautiful? '

According to China's traditional aesthetics, a woman should "show her teeth when she smiles, and show her feet when she walks". Only when she is virtuous and dignified can she be called beautiful. This "concealment" truly reflects the value orientation of China's traditional aesthetic taste, and fully shows the beauty of China women's reserve and showing off their wisdom. However, modern people are too melodramatic, too much, and there is another kind of beauty, that is, the "exposure" of Manchu traditional dress cheongsam. The moderate and revealing cheongsam well grasps the balance between beauty and dew, and fully shows the curvy beauty of oriental women, which is beautiful but not thick, revealing but not ostentatious, and looks noble and elegant. This kind of dew is just right.

Nowadays, with the development of society and the great material richness, especially since the 1990s, some extravagant, decadent and corrupt bad customs have been introduced in the west. It is no exaggeration to say, "If you want to be beautiful, show your thighs ...". Modern people can behave whatever they want, and behave whatever they want until they can't accept it. It's called fashion and fashion. It's not beautiful if you don't follow. It is not beautiful without kitsch.

The times are developing, and now it has entered the era of individuality. Appropriate clothing and accessories should be close to the fashion direction, combine Chinese and western styles, make some appropriate changes between tradition and modernity, and show the new face of China since the reform and opening up. But there is a limit to everything. If we blindly pursue "dew", strapless clothes, strapless clothes, suspenders, miniskirts, etc., not only will it not produce beautiful teaching effects, but it will corrupt society and stop. Fashion trends are not all the embodiment of beauty, and everything should be measured. Don't let the dew wind confuse our eyes and misinterpret beauty.

Lou Feng, you can have a rest! (730 words)

Comment: This article is about "Clothing and Beauty". The author firmly grasps the problem of "revealing" too many clothes in real life, seeks beauty and opposes ugliness, and makes a thorough demonstration.

Sixth, the argument needs to start from the inner feelings.

Starting from the inner feelings of the self is one of the important principles to fully reflect the unique perspective and unique insights of the writing subject and avoid piling up famous sayings and typical materials to write learning-oriented compositions.

Feeling is often a harmonious kiss between emotional ripples and the wind of thinking: when writing this kind of composition, the author's feelings are not like rolling waves, but surging living water, and his thinking is not like a hurricane shaking mountains but with the light footsteps and comfort of the wind; Reading this kind of composition, readers will feel that behind the organized discussion, which is as smooth and pleasant as the wind, is the warmth of the author. Writing argumentative essays also needs emotion, even passion. But it should be accompanied by rational thinking, and finally it should be written in words with clear logic and "discussion" as the main expression.

Example:

How difficult is it to read big social books?

Some people borrow books as a metaphor for society. On this basis, I think it should be added that society is like a book. Books are easy to read, but social books are difficult.

There are four difficulties in the process of reading the book of society by reading: the difficulty lies in-

First, there is something wrong with the book Society.

Most of the books we come into contact with every day have articles such as preface, editor's note or explanation before opening, which is convenient for readers to understand the general content of this book and play a guiding role. The book Society is not so considerate to us. The understanding of it can only be gradually accumulated in the process of reading it. Compared with ordinary books, it is not easy to interpret it-it needs to be understood and felt in "reading".

Second, the book club cannot choose.

When we are studying, we often read for a while before we find that the books we read are not suitable for us. At this time, we often choose to find another book that suits us. If you can't find it, don't look for it at all. Can society be so free and easy? For a book, we have many choices, but there is little room for social choice. There is hardly a society tailored for us, and we can't pick the society like books. Even if we can pick and choose, the result can only be that society chooses people who can adapt to it instead of criticizing it, and eliminates those who are incompatible with society. It is even more impossible for us to take a passive avoidance attitude towards our dissatisfied society, because now the society is developing at a high level, and the environment like the ancient hermit hiding in a leisurely paradise has disappeared. Can't choose, can't escape!

Third, the bookstore is constantly changing.

Reading on weekdays, tired, tired, we will close the book, put it aside, and read it when we are full of energy. Don't worry that the content of the book will change the next time you open it. The content of this book will always change in society. Once put aside, it's hard to catch up. Especially in the information age, we must keep pace with society so as not to be eliminated by society. The characteristics of society determine that people who read it must keep pace with the times and cannot stand still.

Fourth, the similarities and differences of reading notes.

When reading a written book, we write down our knowledge, feelings or gains in the reading process in words as our reading notes. The same is true of reading social books. We use our own behavior to express our personal understanding, attitude and gain from it. However, reading a big book in society is different from reading a small book with words: a wrong understanding is often reflected in a few biased words and wrong views in reading notes, and in a book in society, it may often become an irreparable failure in life and affect the future life.

From this perspective, it is not easy to interpret the Book of Society. There are so many difficulties in comparing society to books, and besides, in life, society does not appear in the form of books. This requires a deeper understanding of it. This requires a more serious attitude to face.

Comments:

This paper demonstrates the "four difficulties" in reading social masterpieces. Although there is no rich reference, I have a reasonable and true inner feeling about reading and being a man. Therefore, it can "convince people" and at the same time "move people" more or less.

Seven, material selection should be in the same field.

Articles are all aimed at solving a certain problem in a certain field, so an argumentative paper of about 1000 words can only be based on a certain problem or a certain kind of problem in a certain field. The topics and materials of small talk in life can "cross" or even "fly over" in different fields-for example, starting with singers, then clothing, then western food, and finally maybe talking about the price reduction of color TV sets.

Sample text

Reason is like ice, passion is like fire.

-one of the secrets of the psychological structure of mature art

The hero's excessive excitement in love leads to tragedy, but I think of the artist's creative psychology.

What is a mature artist? In my opinion, not only strong rationality, but also rich and sincere feelings are indispensable.

The object of an artist's creation must first touch his own heartstrings. Only in this way can he truly understand it deeply and devote all his energy to expressing it. From this perspective, art is the fusion of emotion and reason. In the final analysis, the melody of music, the language of literature and the lines of painters are just tools-tools of emotion and rationality. As an emotional tool, it is used to express one's love and hate; As a rational tool, it is used to explain the author's thinking about things themselves and the unique thoughts formed. What an artist needs to do is how to use this tool to achieve the perfect integration of emotion and reason.

If an artist lacks strong feelings, then his reason must be pale and anaemic; His artistic works will lack appeal and make it difficult to sing. On the other hand, if there is no strong rational support, feelings will become crazy, like a runaway wild horse. Art comes from life and is higher than life. An irrational work of art is like a simple replica of life. Although it is true, it always lacks a charm. Such works of art are lifeless and will be forgotten after a long time.

A mature artist, people can not only truly feel his precious and sincere feelings in his works, but also understand his metaphysical thinking about life, destiny, society and the whole world through his appreciation of these feelings. Taking literary works as an example, people can not only see the author's own sigh about life and worry about fate, but also see his regret about history and hope for the future. In other words, people can not only see vivid artistic images of flesh and blood and get aesthetic satisfaction, but also feel the power of reason through the author's deep and comprehensive thinking about all this.

Cao Xueqin, the author of A Dream of Red Mansions, was reduced from a rich dude to a poor scholar. The huge gap in life and the ups and downs of fate made him extremely disappointed with life and had a strong hatred for the dark authoritarian society, so he wrote A Dream of Red Mansions. As he himself said, "full of absurd words, bitter tears." Dou Yun's author is stupid, who can solve the taste! " .

A Dream of Red Mansions can touch the hearts of countless readers from generation to generation, and the most important thing is the great appeal produced by this strong feeling. How can the words with blood and tears not attract the attention of millions of readers? However, this alone is not enough, and it cannot explain the greatness of A Dream of Red Mansions. Before writing, Cao Xueqin had deeply realized the essence of this society, what kind of society this is and why there are so many ugly phenomena. He has made rational thinking about this society, and profound accusations and exposures must be based on thinking. Deep feelings and deep thinking have created a Dream of Red Mansions, an immortal monument in the history of China literature.

The works of any mature artist must be a blend of reason and passion. Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, Van Gogh's Sunflower, Goethe's Faust and Young Werther ... can all be confirmed by these great works of art created by human beings.

"Passion is like fire, reason is like ice" is the most precious thing a mature artist has. People often say that fire and water are incompatible, but in art, only the combination of fire and water can produce great works.

Comments:

This paper talks about how to deal with the relationship between emotion and reason, and its material selection is locked in the field of "artistic creation"

Why should an argumentative essay of about 1000 words be chosen in the same field? This is because the audience of an article is a relatively fixed group-the audience of this article is people engaged in artistic creation, especially those middle school students who are interested in artistic creation and artistic creation theory. In other words, if you can "have someone in mind" (for whom) before writing an article, the selection of materials will be locked in the same field. Otherwise, the article will not attract many people.

Imagine if the audience of this topic is reduced to middle school students who want to be writers, then the examples of Beethoven, Van Gogh and Goethe are purely redundant.

It's not hard to imagine a worse situation: after listing the example of Cao Xueqin's creation of A Dream of Red Mansions, he went on to write that famous sports stars also need to deal with the relationship between emotion and reason in key competitions (for example, Kong sprained his ankle when competing with Waldner for the Olympic singles title, and sat on the ground without touching his ankle during rest to avoid being injured by the other side, which greatly increased his morale. Kong finally won the championship). When he came to the Three Kingdoms, Zhang Fei was stabbed to death by a tailor because he was eager for revenge. Finally, he came to the present situation that young parents can neither spoil their children nor always use sticks and fists. In writing, the materials involve four fields: literary creation, sports competition, human behavior and the relationship between two generations. The materials seem to serve the relationship between "emotion and reason", but the author doesn't know who this composition is for.