Recruitment in Linglong Gold Mine

After reading your question, I found it very interesting and the answers were varied. I will answer, but I don't think you should ask any more questions, it will be endless!

Question 1. Abilities include: professional skills, writing, language expression, hands-on practice, thinking debate, interpersonal communication, learning ability, adaptability, ability to solve practical problems and so on.

Question 2. When people go to college or receive higher education, they actually learn not only professional knowledge, but also a kind of thinking, a kind of thinking about how to learn and how to adapt, which is unmatched by groups without higher education (except individuals, of course, I am talking about the vast majority of groups here). Then when enterprises choose high education, they value the future development space and development potential of this group more than low education. People's speed and efficiency in spreading and accepting new knowledge and culture are higher than those with low academic qualifications. Having a degree does not prove that he is more capable, but at least it proves that he is better than people without a degree in the past ten years. Even people who don't study grew up in this environment. If you have a college student, will you go to a primary school student?

Question 3. Who says there is no concept of measuring ability? Of course there is. The concept of measuring ability is whether this person can solve practical problems and to what extent, so it is obvious whether a person's ability is good or bad. When he is studying, he pays more attention to his grades. When he grows up, he will pay more attention to the benefits you have brought to enterprises and individuals. For example, two people go to the same person to do one thing, one person is too stupid to do it, and the other person can do it well. Isn't that the difference?

Question 4: If the concept of sage is so superficial, then people all over the world are basically immortals.

Question 5. We should look at the question of whether high-level figures have high academic qualifications in this way. As a government worker, most of the original academic qualifications were ordinary universities or even junior colleges, but gradually the junior college was definitely gone. After the summit, their academic qualifications also improved with their studies. Note that it depends on the original education. For the ordinary working class you mentioned, especially those engaged in scientific research, their academic qualifications are very high, and their master's and doctor's degrees are normal.

Question 6. There is something wrong with your question. A person's energy is limited, which leads to his limited learning, so people's abilities are different. If you ask politicians and scientists to compare their scientific research ability, it is obviously unreliable. You should ask them who is better than who! However, one thing is certain: people at the top are much stronger than ordinary wage earners in terms of social viability and adaptability, otherwise they will not reach that position.

After the answer, in fact, your question reflects your weak knowledge and divorced from reality. These are good for you. I suggest you read more books, study more and practice more!

Have you ever thought about the cause of this probability problem? People, like animals, survive the fittest. People with high academic qualifications receive more education, while those who don't go to college receive less education and lag behind, which leads to this probability problem.

But to say how high this degree is, I think it should be defined as a university degree! Master's and doctor's words are stronger than ability, see what kind of ability!