Report that the 20 10 exam in zhenyuan county institutions is untrue.

Views on the Invalidation of More than 20 10 700 Test Papers in zhenyuan county.

This time, more than 700 test papers were invalid because they were marked.

The basis of the Personnel Bureau and the Examination Committee is that "candidates are not allowed to make any marks irrelevant to the answers, otherwise the papers will be invalid", and that the marking teachers have cheated, so the papers are invalid and invalid.

Candidates believe that the marks made on the test paper are related to solving problems and answering questions. The marks are formed in the process of answering questions and are the necessity of answering questions. First, in the exam, the number of questions is quite large (such as an exam), and the time is tight. Some uncertain questions are consciously put after the answers, and then they are done according to the time situation. In order not to miss the topic, some marks will inevitably be made before or on the topic; Second, some questions that have been answered, in order not to waste time or miss the questions repeatedly, mark some questions; Third, mark the answers to the exam questions first, and then fill in the answer sheet after thinking clearly before you have a chance to change them; The fourth is to mark the key words of the exam questions first to help you think and understand the meaning of the questions so as to answer them accurately.

As far as I know, I'd like to make some comments on this recruitment:

1, the design of this test paper is unscientific. Now the answer sheet of the formal exam is separate from the test paper, so it can be marked on the test paper. However, Zhenyuan's papers are inseparable. Candidates habitually mark the answer sheet according to other formal examination experience, instead of cheating with the marking teacher.

2. On the back of the admission ticket, "Candidates are not allowed to make any marks irrelevant to the answer, otherwise the test paper will be invalid". The Examination Committee did not specify this provision before the exam, nor did it explicitly inform the candidates. Even many examination rooms did not announce the examination room discipline before the exam. The mark related to the answer is unilaterally recognized after the test paper is unpacked. As long as there is a mark, it is considered a violation of this regulation. All of them are in collusion with the marking teacher and declare the paper invalid. Is this behavior?

3. Before the morning exam, there is no specific definition of whether marking is related to the answer. During and after the exam, it is common to find marking on the test paper at each test center. The invigilator specializes in this matter and thinks that marking is the process of answering questions, not cheating, and the test paper is valid. Examiners (Personnel Bureau) bought correction fluid and distributed it to all examination rooms, asking invigilators to help candidates erase the marks on the examination papers (whether this violates the national examination regulations or not).

4. Some invigilators help to correct the scores of test papers with correction fluid, but many invigilators often participate in invigilation, know the discipline of invigilation, and dare not correct the candidates' test papers, resulting in two results. First, fortunately, the invigilator helped to correct it and became an effective test paper without cheating, but unfortunately, the invigilator did not correct the answer and became waste paper suspected of cheating, which was unfair.

There are invigilators and invigilators in the examination room of each test center. Candidates' test papers are checked and confirmed by invigilators, and then enter the marking and marking procedure. It was not until the result of marking came out that cheating was unilaterally deemed invalid. Does this violate the relevant provisions of the national examination?

6. Candidates cheat in violation of the examination rules. According to the relevant provisions of the national examination, the examination paper should be declared invalid at the examination site, and the candidates should sign the handling opinions. Is it unreasonable to unilaterally declare the test paper invalid without the signature of the candidates and the factual evidence of collusion between the discipline inspection and supervision organs or the public security organs?

7. This time, more than 700 papers are suspected of colluding with the marking teacher to cheat in marking, and there are 300 to 400 suspects. It should be a major case, whether there is a leader or not, whether there is organizational behavior (of course, the personnel department has the right to decide who is the marking teacher, and other individuals do not have this ability). Discipline inspection and supervision organs and even public security organs should intervene to find out who is the mastermind and who is the contact, but I believe Zhenyuan examination room is not that dark. The examiner should seriously investigate the truth of the incident, make a careful decision, and analyze the specific problems. Such a decision is deciding the fate of thousands of people and should not be so irresponsible. It should fairly and justly judge the meaning of these marks and the standard of whether they are related to the test paper, and also give the candidates an innocence.