On-the-job employees have been buying social security in their original units, but our company does not. What if I need compensation?

There is no need to pay economic compensation or social security. This is a problem involving dual labor relations, and various viewpoints are not exactly the same. Article 91 of the Labor Contract Law stipulates that if an employer recruits workers who have not dissolved or terminated their labor contracts with other employers, and thus causes losses to other employers, it shall be jointly and severally liable for compensation. Thirdly, the legitimacy of dual labor relations is clarified. Therefore, the law allows the existence of dual labor relations, but if the dual labor relations affect the original employer or the new employer, it is necessary to bear corresponding responsibilities. Buying social security in another company is based on labor relations. Moreover, at present, the social insurance relationship should only participate in one item at the same time, and the treatment can only enjoy one item. The company can't continue to participate in insurance. The economic compensation stipulated in the Labor Contract Law fails to pay social insurance premiums for workers according to law; Due to the dual labor relationship, this person has a social security relationship, and the company cannot pay social security for the workers according to law.

Therefore, there is no fault in the Company Law, and personal opinions do not need to pay economic compensation or social security.