Is it reasonable for the state to forcibly purchase social security? Take human rights?

Why should the state force it? This problem cannot be considered only from the aspect of paying for it. If the state does not force the purchase of social security, I believe many people will not buy it. What is the result? The most important thing is two aspects, one is providing for the aged and the other is medical care.

Pension: you don't pay social security before retirement, and you can't get a pension after retirement. Who will support you after retirement? Rely on your children? Fortunately, now the children themselves are not subsidized, so don't think about it; Also, you can make money when you are young, so will your ability to make money when you are old be as strong as when you are young? Who will pay for your retirement when you are old and have no stable income? Therefore, the old-age insurance in social security is to let us have money to continue living when we are old, so as not to expose the pot.

Medical treatment: What bed is the most expensive now? The answer is a hospital bed. Medical expenses are increasing at the rate of 20%~30% every year. How much do you earn every month now? Is it enough to meet the medical expenses of a serious illness? What if it's not enough? Do you get sympathy donations by TV? Or by the state? Although the country has a heart, it can't cope with a country with such a large population. Then you can only rely on yourself to ensure that you can continue to get effective treatment in the case of serious illness, and you will not run around for medical expenses and borrow money everywhere, which will also drag down your family. Therefore, medical care is more important than providing for the aged. Do you think it is more social security money paid every month or expensive medical expenses?

In the social security paid by the company, most of the expenses are borne by the company, and only a small part is borne by itself. What are you dissatisfied with? This is not a burden for us at all, but a kind of welfare.

So I don't quite understand what your human rights mean. Maybe you will say that it allows us to choose to insure what we want instead of buying what we don't want. But it's not that you don't understand the people at home now, you only pay attention to the immediate interests, and you won't consider it at all in the future. But what really happens in the future, you will start to call the country not responsible for itself. Therefore, the state can only force the purchase, so that everyone can be guaranteed.

I hope I can help you!