Is the introducer responsible for buying social security?

Legal analysis: Whether the introducer who was cheated into buying social security is responsible or not needs to file a case according to whether the middleman knows. If the middleman knows it, it belongs to the crime of * *, which can be identified as the crime of * * *; If the middleman doesn't know the crime, he is not responsible.

Legal basis: People's Republic of China (PRC) Criminal Law.

Twenty-fifth * * * accomplice refers to two or more * * * accomplices who commit intentional crimes. If two or more people commit a negligent crime, they shall not be punished as negligent crimes; Those who should bear criminal responsibility should be punished according to the crimes they committed.

Article 266 Whoever defrauds public or private property in a relatively large amount shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance, and shall also, or shall only, be fined; If the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years and shall also be fined; If the amount is especially huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years or life imprisonment, and shall also be fined or confiscated. Where there are other provisions in this Law, such provisions shall prevail.