How to evaluate "the proof is still alive, and the 90-year-old man was carried upstairs for the annual social security review."

It can only show that the social security bureau's arrangement in this regard is unreasonable during the annual review, such as letting staff go to the site for audit, or setting up an audit site in the street, or moving the audit window to the first floor.

On the other hand, if it is not reviewed in time, it may lead to the loss of social security funds. For example, someone falsifies information to receive subsidies, or pretends to receive subsidies. The social security fund consists of social security fees, interest, late fees and other expenses paid by all social security personnel. If someone falsifies information and successfully misappropriates funds, doesn't it mean that the interests of all payers are damaged?

You can't say that the system bullies people when you see the old man being carried upstairs. How many people know that the perpetrator escaped/the unit can't recover the money first without losing money? If one day you are seriously ill and need a lot of money for treatment, the social security fund will be empty, then who do you think is to blame? Keep a group of ants in a rice jar. Every ant takes a little food from it every day, no matter how many meters are left in the rice jar every day. Finally, there is no rice in the rice jar to worry about. From the beginning, we should pay attention to whether there are ants secretly taking more, whether there are cracks in the rice jar, and whether anyone adds rice in time.