Which is better, land acquisition social security or employee social security?

According to legal inquiry: Compared with employee social security, employee social security is better. Under the same conditions, employees receive higher social security benefits and pay higher fees. Moreover, the employee social security unit undertakes part of it, and the proportion of employee social security hospitalization medical reimbursement is higher, so employee social security is better.

1. Concept and object: Social security for land expropriation is established to protect the rights and interests of rural residents who lose their livelihood security due to land expropriation, and the expenses are paid by the government, village collectives and villagers. Employee social security is aimed at working residents in cities and towns, and the expenses are paid jointly by companies and individuals. The two are different in concept and goal.

2. Pension standards: the pension standards for land acquisition and social security are usually related to the local urban minimum living standard; The pension amount of employee social security depends on the local average wage standard and the individual's payment period and payment standard. Generally speaking, the pension standard of employee social security is higher.

3. Scope and standard of protection: Social security for land acquisition mainly focuses on the living security of landless farmers, while social security for employees has a wider scope and higher insurance standards, which can fully guarantee people's life and employment safety. To sum up, although social security for land acquisition provides a certain living guarantee for landless farmers, social security for employees has more advantages in coverage and pension standards. However, the specific choice of social security should also be considered according to the actual situation of individuals, such as economic ability and living needs.