What is the worst performance of the typical countries of each European social security model in the European debt crisis?

Taking an overview of the performance (efficiency and equity) of the four major European social security sub-models in the crisis, we find that:the crisis has led to an overall decline in absolute performance, but the ranking of the performance of the four major models has remained essentially unchanged:the Nordic model is at the top, the Continental model is slightly worse, the Anglo? The Anglo-Saxon model is in third place and the Mediterranean model is at the bottom. In terms of countries, Germany and Ireland are the two extreme cases with the largest increases and decreases in performance. There are three reasons why the sub-models performed very differently in the crisis:First, the sub-models differed in the philosophy, structure and development strategy of their social security systems. Second, the timeliness and depth and breadth of the reforms of the social security system carried out by the sub-models differed. The good performance of the Nordic and Rhineland models is not unrelated to the systematic and comprehensive reforms of the social security system that they carried out before the crisis. Finally, there are differences in the social security responses to the crisis across the sub-models. Germany in the Continental model and Sweden in the Nordic model responded mainly by lowering social security taxes and pursuing active employment incentives, while the UK in the Anglo-Saxon model responded mainly by lowering social security taxes and pursuing active employment incentives. While the UK in the Saxon model has focused on active fiscal policy, the Mediterranean model has taken measures that have had significant negative effects. Despite the degree of economic recession to raise the minimum wage level increases the labor costs of enterprises, reducing the public's willingness to work, etc..