Talent quality evaluation

Talent quality evaluation, I believe many people are familiar with this concept. In many interviews, interviewers often ask people to fill in this evaluation. This is a test that can analyze personal ability, but some people still don't understand it. Let me introduce the talent quality assessment to you.

Talent quality evaluation 1 1, the basic meaning of talent quality evaluation

Nowadays, talent quality evaluation has become the mainstream talent selection method. This online evaluation method reduces the burden for enterprises, avoids all kinds of tedious recruitment work and improves work efficiency.

The types of talent quality assessment are divided according to different standards. It can be divided into single evaluation and comprehensive evaluation. Generally, single evaluation is adopted in enterprise personnel training, and comprehensive evaluation is needed in the process of personnel selection. According to the evaluation techniques and means, it is generally divided into quantitative evaluation and fuzzy evaluation. Different standards have different evaluation methods, which need to be summarized in practice.

2. Why should we evaluate the quality of talents?

In the evaluation of talent quality, there are both affirmation of excellent quality and recognition of poor quality. Therefore, the evaluation of talent quality can organically combine the expectations of human resources personnel with the self-cultivation of the evaluated person, and promote the further improvement of personal quality.

Secondly, the evaluation function of talent quality evaluation will encourage and strengthen individuals to become better and improve their comprehensive quality. Everyone has a desire for self-respect and self-improvement, and hopes to achieve good results and results in the evaluation. Faced with a disappointing talent quality evaluation, individuals often show disappointment and are eager to become better with their own actions.

3. How to evaluate the quality of talents?

Common talent evaluation methods mainly include: psychological test, face-to-face communication, observation and evaluation, etc. When recruiting, the human resources department of an enterprise often needs to consider various factors of job seekers, such as psychological stress resistance, self-discipline, organizational ability, communication and expression ability and so on. According to the characteristics of the recruitment position, match the job seeker and the post competency model.

Talent quality evaluation, as a way of talent selection, job seekers also need to know their own advantages and disadvantages in advance, make good use of each other's strengths and make up for each other's shortcomings, so as to better improve themselves, gain a better competitive advantage in job hunting, and choose a suitable position by knowing themselves to avoid invalid application.

What are the characteristics of talent quality assessment 2?

Talent quality evaluation refers to the process that the evaluation subject uses scientific methods to collect the representative information of the evaluated person in the main activities and judge the value or value of a talent quality evaluation index system. The following is the related content of "What are the characteristics of talent quality evaluation for you".

Classification comparison method

This method usually divides people into different categories according to certain standards, lists different types of salient features, and distinguishes them through feature matching, so as to identify and appoint talents. For example, Liu Shao divided talents into 12 in "People's Tales and Flows", including legalists, artists, national sports, equipment, abilities, concealment, tricks, wisdom, articles, Confucianism, oral arguments, heroes and so on. , and cited some figures in the history of China to illustrate. On the basis of classification, each category is subdivided. For example, according to different personality characteristics, Xunzi divided scholars into: "ordinary scholars (respecting the monarch and loving the people and being sensible), men (impartial), straight scholars (honest and honest, frank and straightforward), embarrassed scholars (honest and trustworthy, modest and prudent) and villains (mercenary, capricious in words and deeds)." In Shuo Wen Jie Zi, Liu Xiang divided six meanings and six evils according to the way of dealing with people and officials. Six exactly refer to "saints, good ministers, loyal ministers, loyal ministers, loyal ministers, loyal ministers and direct ministers", and "six evils" refer to "ministers, disloyal ministers, treacherous officials, thieves and dead ministers", and their behaviors are listed separately to facilitate the distinction.

Practical appraisal method

This method is to identify talents through actual performance in practice. Confucius said, "Listen to what he says and watch what he does." To judge a person, we should not only look at what he said, but also observe his actual performance. According to the records in Lv Chunqiu, the practice appraisal method should begin in the period of Yao and Shun, and Listening in Lv Chunqiu describes the process of Yao and Shun's investigation, including five aspects: first, to marry two daughters and examine Shun's character; Second, let Shun make a formal law to see if he can serve the public; Third, let Prime Minister Shun be a hundred officials and examine his management ability; Fourth, let Shun receive guests and examine his communicative competence; Fifth, Shun was sent to visit the mountain to inspect his actual work performance. Yao's investigation of Shun can be said to be comprehensive and systematic. Wang Chong said in Lun Heng: "Test his deeds with nine virtues and his words with things." Wang Anshi believes that the evaluation of people should not "listen to one person's words privately", but "serve people with morality and talents", and at the same time "test people with things" to see their specific performance. Zeng Guofan believes that people who have moral integrity should take precedence over those who have no bureaucratic style. They should be down-to-earth (go deep into the grassroots), have a clear mind (clearly defined), have eyes (observe everything), have hands (start work) and have words (orders).

Public opinion survey method

In the long-term talent evaluation, the ancients put forward that the opinions and opinions of the masses should be regarded as one aspect of talent evaluation, but at the same time they put forward the view of "not knowing people by geography" and thought that the public opinion of the masses was biased to some extent and should be treated differently.

While inspecting public opinion, Confucius advocated that public opinion can only be used as a reference for inspecting and evaluating people. We should not only trust the masses, but also blindly cater to them and think that the reputation of the secular is not enough. In The Analects of Confucius Lutz XIII, Zi Gong asked, "If all the villagers are good?" Confucius said, "There is nothing I can do." "What if all the villagers hate it?" Confucius said, "No, it's not as good as the villagers, and evil is evil." Confucius' proposition can be said to be very pertinent, effectively avoiding the shortcomings of public opinion survey methods.