[Job Search] One day of my interview at Huawei

First of all, let me introduce the position I applied for-network technical engineer, also referred to as technical support, which is a skilled position with the ability to get along with people and serve customers. In my opinion, this department is equivalent to the railway service department after the completion of the railway, not only to maintain the normal operation of the railway, but also to establish a good image of the company. In my opinion, the responsibility is really great. Although some people seem to tell me in a dismissive tone, this is just senior customer service. But our technology supports suits and ties, and at the same time, we must be proficient in technology and have various abilities to deal with emergencies. What we know and learn is very comprehensive. I think this is a very training position. At the same time, I feel very good that this position can serve people all over the world in the front line of Huawei. Let me talk about the interview process and preparation for this position.

I submitted my resume in August. Then in September, 1 1 started a round of resume screening. I don't know if our college counselor said that if Huawei's HR came to consult, he would recommend me, or if my resume was really wonderful and touched HR. Anyway, I was a little lacking in confidence, successfully passed the resume screening and received the interview notice.

Before this, I have actually collected some information about Huawei. After receiving the interview notice, I frantically collected a wave of information about Huawei. Including some information about official website, and then the annual reports of Huawei 14, 15, 16, some speeches made by Ren, some popular posts in Xinyu community, some recent developments of Huawei, comments made by the outside world on Huawei, and some statements made by Huawei to employees. In addition, there are Huawei's work projects, recent development direction, and a small number of professional problems. For example, NFV/SDN, 5G, graphene batteries, Kirin series chips, the latest Huawei mobile phones and so on.

In addition, I have to say that a suit is a must. If you are a skilled worker, you can wear it or not. But I personally feel that it will be better to wear, and the whole person will be more formal and energetic. This will also be a very good respect for the interviewer.

I also want to talk about my personal feelings, that is, your personal information must be arranged neatly, and it is best to clip it together with a transparent small wallet like me, and it is also convenient for technical interviewers to turn pages to find your information. Meanwhile, please be sure to color the material. Although a dollar is a bit expensive, from my point of view, there are too many colors to watch. Black and white can't find a point at all.

First of all, I am at 10:20 in the morning. At nine o'clock, a staff member called me to confirm whether I could be present. Then, when we arrived, we almost entered the first link in time-group face! Until then, you need to wait in the hall.

If you read your name in the first link, then you have to follow it out and hand in your ID card to sign in. The staff will group you. Then we went in a group, 14 people in a room, facing three examiners. The examiner will separate the first half from the other half and divide them into two groups in the order you enter. Then a simulation team confrontation is carried out. Or simulate the competition between two teams within the company.

First, the examiner will introduce himself first. Then he will let each member of each group introduce themselves step by step. We are: seven people, four minutes, about 35 seconds each. So your self-introduction must be divided into several versions. Keep the group version below 30 seconds, 20 seconds to 30 seconds, and be concise and capable. In addition, you must prepare another version of self-introduction, that is, in front of the double-sided and three-sided examiners, each of them will let you introduce yourself, and the time is unlimited, but you must hurry up, about one to two minutes. At this time, you have to show your advantages. My double-sided and three-sided examiners asked me, what do you think are your advantages in this job? He won't ask you to compare with others because he knows that many people have this thing. But he must let you have a fairly clear understanding of yourself. At the same time, you can have a career plan at most. Of course, if not, you can expand yourself as he says. It doesn't matter. This is the second one. After introducing yourself in the previous session, the interviewer will ask you to choose a leader for each group and give the group a name. And explain the origin of this name, just a brief introduction, not too fancy. Say what comes to mind. This won't affect your impression, but be sure to make it clear. Then I entered other projects.

Next link! Yes, this should be the sorting problem that everyone sees in the face book. Our ranking proposal today has 12 factors, which rank their influence on career success respectively. Then I think there is no need to say more about this topic. First establish standards, and then subdivide the corresponding factors according to each standard before inserting. You don't need this standard to be recognized by the whole world. As long as you are recognized by your main force and the interviewer thinks what you say is reasonable, then you are right. This kind of topic is relatively objective, and you don't need to find an absolutely correct answer at all, as long as you stand firm. At the same time, there are no logical errors. The whole process adds up to 20 minutes. The basic method of bisection we adopted at that time was divided into two parts: subjective and objective. Then subjectively divided into congenital and acquired, objectively divided into controllable and uncontrollable, and then classified and sorted, which can play a very good role in establishing standards and good thinking logic!

After 20 minutes, the interviewer will ask for a round of two-party summary speeches, with five minutes for each group and ten minutes for each group. In this process, after the host in his group has expressed himself. The interviewer will tell the people in the group whether there is any supplement, but the time for this supplement must also be within five minutes. In other words, how much time can the speaker have left in five minutes, that is, the time that other people in the group can express.

After the speech, we entered a session similar to the debate between the two sides, and everyone spoke alternately. Remember, in this process, don't show yourself too much and don't hide yourself too much, both of which will make you have a bad impression on the interviewer. Please remember that the standard of group face is to eliminate bad, not the best, and poor performance will be eliminated.

Then after this round, I entered the most tangled link. First, I discuss it in groups. In five minutes, I discussed the two best performers and the two worst performers in this group. Then the team leader stated the reasons in a unified way. Then, if you are the team leader at this time, please remember to express clearly and don't criticize your classmates, because he is your partner anyway, and Huawei hates this kind of intra-group attack. You just need to state what this classmate did badly. Then there is a similar link after this link, which is to choose the best two and the worst two for the other team. The requirements are the same as above, because although you are two groups, you are also colleagues of Huawei, so you can evaluate objectively, without subjective factors, and avoid sharp and passionate words.

Then, after this session, the interviewer may ask those students who are selected as the worst to speak and express themselves. Don't criticize yourself at this time. You can talk about the reasons for your poor performance today, but don't deny yourself. If you deny yourself, why didn't the interviewer hang you up?

At the same time, students in the middle must not be complacent, because the interviewer in our group is wonderful. For those students who are not in the middle, each group chooses one to ask. If you are speechless at this time, you may even get the worst evaluation in the interviewer's mind.

It takes about an hour and a half to finish an interview. The rest of us went out for dinner. I ate at Pizza Hut.

It's already half past one when I come back from dinner. After a short rest, at about three o'clock, we finally got the news from each other. The second side is the business side. If the major is strongly related, then you must be prepared for the relevant professional knowledge. If you are a non-related major, you should also prepare some professional-related materials, because the interviewer will ask you some basic questions, such as TCP/IP model, and then some basic knowledge, such as OSI model, UDP protocol, DHCP, DNS, TCP three-way handshake and so on. At the same time, everything on your resume will be singled out for questioning. For example, when I wrote that I had been a monitor for three years, the interviewer corrected the problem and asked me for about eight minutes. I asked about the activities I have organized, the best activities you think have been organized, and why you think this best activity is better than the one you mentioned at the beginning. You must have something to say about your resume, because the most intuitive way for an interviewer to understand you is to look at your resume. This is basically a common means of two sides and three sides. In addition, let me specifically state my experience on the second side.

First of all, the interviewer asked me to introduce myself at first. Then let me introduce the items written on my resume, to be more specific. Then he asked me that question about the monitor. After that, I asked a more metaphysical question about my personal qualities. Is that why you think you are qualified for this job? What qualities are qualified for this job? After you say your merits, you will know that if you exaggerate again, you will die. Because it will let you give a more specific example to prove that what you said is true. If he hears that you are bragging or fooling him, do you think you will know better than a leader who has been engaged in management for many years? I think there may be many students who died inexplicably, which may be at this point. And I was more real in the whole process, especially because the examiner touched the biggest thing when I was a child, so I almost cried. Nothing is appropriate to say. I think it will be more real in the eyes of the interviewer. Because if you reach this level in acting, then you will definitely perform better when receiving customers. Finally, finally! ! The interviewer asked me a very serious question, that is, if you join Huawei now, there is no one else on the job site, and your ability is not enough to solve the problem you are currently facing, but the customer asks you to solve this problem in a short time, what should you do? My answer is to find some big cows to help me solve this problem by phone or QQ. Then, sure enough, the interviewer stood in my way. He said, what if you can't find someone on your mobile phone? Then I said, first of all, I want to stabilize the customers, and if possible, I want to control the situation not to deteriorate, and then report to the leader immediately. Notify the person who can solve this problem while saving the company's image and business as much as possible. We must ensure that the customer's problems are satisfactorily solved, and at the same time, we must ensure the timeliness of the company's response. But I think in fact, in this process, I have a better solution, that is, tell the leader first, and then ask others for help. Because there is a time reuse in this process, if you tell the leader, then the leader can take action immediately instead of waiting for you to make a phone call to announce it. There is a deviation of several minutes in this time. Maybe you missed a chance to save it in these few minutes.

After resting in the comprehensive interview waiting area for about half an hour. Called to the comprehensive interview area by a young lady. This time, the interviewer looks very friendly, and I feel better, because after the first two rounds of interviews, I feel that my mentality has been adjusted and I can adapt to such a workplace recruitment atmosphere. Commonly known as! ! It feels like this! So in the third round, I was actually more relaxed. I introduced myself in detail, which is equivalent to combined and double-sided self-introduction. And in this process, because the interviewer seems to be a senior leader, he has a lot of business to consult him (I heard about the network problem of Tsinghua Peking University). So our whole conversation was interrupted three times, twice by phone and once by a colleague asking him about the computer. So maybe the interviewer felt guilty about me because I sat there waiting for about ten minutes. Of course, even if the interviewer doesn't have this kind of psychology, our chat process is very pleasant, and the final interview feels more like a casual conversation, for me. The interviewer also asked me the question that I like running in my self-introduction. He asked me about my pace and average pace, which moved me very much. On the contrary, this last side doesn't pay special attention to the project, because he knows that all the projects you wrote before have been asked. In the second interview, the interviewer may have written your information online and he saw it. So this round, or every round, you must be very sincere, and your words must be clear and give people a positive image. At the same time, my suggestion is to wear a formal coat even in hot weather, because wearing a shirt is not a formal suit, which I asked the boss of a suit shop. Moreover, there is air conditioning at the interview site, and it is not very hot. Of course, when you are nervous, you still sweat. For example, I sometimes get nervous, and then my hands will sweat, but it won't affect the interview. On the contrary, it may improve your impression, at least it won't lower your score!

After the comprehensive interview, I have a hunch that I should have passed. Sure enough, the interviewer asked me to do an English test! But I didn't expect my reputation to be ruined. Now I think about my English. It's not rubbish. In a word, say a paragraph in the first four seconds, pause in the middle four seconds and say a paragraph in the last four seconds. Two different tenses are used. Sometimes words are hard to learn.

In the process of English assessment, in the first round, you look at five sentences (one by one, one for 20 seconds) and then read them sentence by sentence. There is also a very funny place, that is, the first introduction, which means I will tell you the format and requirements of this topic. Then, the person in front saw this paragraph as a topic, so did I, and so did the people behind. Silence. When I was nervous, a sentence suddenly popped up and I couldn't help but read it out loud! Generally, they are very simple sentences, and there are probably one or two words you don't know in one sentence. At this time, it depends on luck. If you are lucky, it is the difficulty of junior high school, otherwise it is the difficulty of high school! Second, listening, multiple-choice questions are single choice, followed by relatively simple listening questions. See Improving Junior High School English Listening for details. For example, I remember a topic like this. When you listen, you will hear:

He will never do sth and balabala~~ So in the title, I will ask you, which of the following statements is correct?

Third, the most deceptive, give you a topic, 20 seconds to prepare, you have to speak for two minutes, remember that you are talking nonsense. Then let me describe my situation to you. I have two topics:

1, do you have a favorite TV series? Why do you like it?

At present, many people go abroad to work for several months or even years, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Please give your opinion.

Then ~ nonsense, this is really helpless. Forget the on-site composition, read it out, and pay attention to the logical structure and grammatical tense! My state at that time:

The first five seconds were stupid. Then start, uh-huh, uh-huh oh. Mm-hmm. Repeat the above process several times! ! Then there are all kinds of grammatical errors, temporal errors and logical errors. Finally, a topic brings some topics like primary school students' English to life. But fortunately, I practiced more and more later, because I haven't read English seriously for more than a year. As for speaking English, it seems that I have only spoken a few words to foreigners since I went to college. Usually it's okay, okay, thank you and so on. So, if you have higher requirements for yourself, please be sure to prepare your English. You'd better find a general nonsense template and play for the last two minutes, otherwise you'll feel a little sad. Just like I am now. I wonder if I will fail the English exam. Although my interview seems to have passed.