Job Recruitment Website - Zhaopincom - Why was the school part-time male teacher sentenced to 3 years?

Why was the school part-time male teacher sentenced to 3 years?

A male teacher was sentenced to three years for molesting three underage male students.

On June 1, the Supreme People's Court reported six typical cases of crimes against minors, involving buying abducted children, abducting children, abusing ward, compulsory indecency and rape.

In recent years, the people's courts have severely punished all kinds of criminal cases that infringe on the rights and interests of minors. According to Guan Jian, vice president of the First Court of Supreme Law and Punishment, from 20 13 to 20 16, the national courts concluded 37 13 cases of abducting and selling women and children and 10782 cases of child molestation.

Since the implementation of the Ninth Amendment to the Criminal Law, the people's courts have tried a number of new criminal cases that infringe on the rights and interests of minors, including kindergarten teachers stabbing children to death and sexually assaulting underage male students.

Sexual assault cases are the types of crimes against minors that judicial organs focus on punishing. The newspaper pointed out that the communique also listed a case in which a male teacher violated a minor male.

The case shows that the defendant Pan Defeng was originally a part-time teacher in a school in Shenyang, Liaoning. During 20 15, 1 1 to 20 16, Pan Defeng brought three underage male students home, forced the three victims to stay overnight under the pretext of not drinking or disrespecting the teacher, and repeatedly molested them while they were asleep.

The court of Shenbei New District of Shenyang held through trial that the defendant Pan Defeng used his teacher status to pressure the victim and persuade him to drink, and then committed obscene acts while the victim was asleep, which constituted a crime of compulsory obscenity and was sentenced to 3 years' imprisonment.

Explaining the typical significance of the case, the Supreme Law stated that although the criminal law has always paid attention to the protection of the sexual rights of women and children, it has neglected the protection of the sexual rights of male minors over the age of 14. At the same time, the whole society is relatively lacking in sexual assault prevention education for male minors. The neglect of parents and schools makes it easy for male minors to lack the awareness of self-protection, and also makes it difficult to find the crime of sexual assault on male minors.

According to Article 13 of the Criminal Law Amendment (IX), whoever forcibly molests others or insults women by violence, coercion or other means shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or criminal detention. This means that anyone who commits compulsory indecency against the will of others, whether the object of indecency is women or men, whether minors or adults, constitutes a crime.

"The Criminal Law Amendment (IX) extends the object of the crime of compulsory indecency to men, so that the rights and interests of male minors who are over 14 but under 18 can be effectively protected." The Supreme Law puts forward that it is necessary to strengthen the education of preventing sexual assault on male minors and improve their awareness and ability of safety prevention and self-protection.

I believe that under the protection of the law, we can give the campus a pure land.