Why do you feel that you don't have enough time to do a job, but some people take several jobs easily?

"Too busy", is this sentence always on my lips?

Do you just want to lie still in bed when you come home from work every day?

Are there some people around you who have done a lot of things, even have multiple jobs, but still feel at ease? You want to know: how did they do it?

Yuan Hua Ze, a Japanese son of man, has a book entitled "Why elites are controlled by time", which introduces how he changed from a doctor who worked overtime every day to exhaustion to a super slash winner.

We can look at his "slash" achievements:

Three books are published every year.

Update online magazines, Facebook and blogs every day.

Go to the hospital for consultation six times a month.

Read more than 20 books a month and publish book reviews.

Hold 2-3 seminars and lectures every month.

Go to the gym to exercise 4-5 times a week.

Go to the movies twice a week.

Attend at least 15 dinner party every month.

Travel abroad for more than 30 days every year.

If you think this is a foreign example, it may have its particularity. So, are there such people around us?

For example, several lawyers I know, in addition to the usual business activities such as court sessions, also serve as the director of the law firm, handling administrative affairs, holding meetings and making decisions. At the same time, they are also the leaders of the Bar Association, and it is common to attend various meetings and have dinner with clients. In addition, reputable lawyers are arbitrators, handling more than a dozen cases a year. In addition, they will personally write papers, speeches, consultation, training and social welfare activities. Some people still insist on sports, playing golf and tennis, and often go to the gym for running and swimming. In addition, they are all-rounders and have a wide range of interests. They also participate in activities outside the legal profession, such as learning business management knowledge, publishing management articles, studying social and economic development, and even participating in the discussion of state affairs.

These successful people, like superman, do more than three different jobs and even engage in three unrelated occupations at the same time. We call such people "slash winners" or "diversified operators".

On the contrary, the lower the income, the more you can only do one job, but you still feel that time is not enough.

However, is our time really that short? Why do some people do several different part-time jobs at the same time, but they can do it with ease? Don't, is that they are born with super powers? So, they are destined to be winners and we are destined to be losers?

Next, let's analyze this problem together. Maybe you can find the answer you want from it.

Myth 1: How much time does it take to represent your output and achievements?

For an office worker, because we don't have much monetary capital to invest, it is difficult for us to get passive income, and we can only get income by selling our time. Time has become the only resource and means for us to make money.

At the same time, most of our wages are paid by the hour, so the more time you spend, the more income you will get. In this way, time and money draw an equal sign.

However, blindly relying on the addition of time and blindly believing that "no pains, no gains" can only lead us astray.

Although many people envy those "slash winners", they wonder how they did it. Don't they eat, drink or sleep?

Our questioning just shows our short-sightedness and prejudice.

In fact, a person's achievement is not a simple accumulation of time, but follows a formula, that is: output = time × unit time benefit.

For example, you are a rookie and your income per unit time is very low. You may only have 20 yuan every hour and 160 yuan eight hours a day. For professional masters, their income per unit time is ten times higher than yours. So he only needs to work for half a day, and his salary is five or six times that of you.

Therefore, what matters is not the variable "time", but the variable of your unit time income, that is, the unit price. The higher your "unit price", the more valuable you are.

For another example, a part-time writer who is also engaged in the media industry, the difference between a rookie and a big coffee is not the amount of time invested by each other, but the value of their unit time. People may write 1000 yuan or even 10000 yuan per hour, and you only have a few dollars. Then, even if you die, you won't earn as much as him.

Therefore, if you want to succeed, you can't just increase your investment time, but improve your "gold content". At this point, you need to spend your time in the early stage of study, charging, upgrading your skills and enhancing your popularity. Of course, it takes time. But this kind of "time" is used to build a personal brand, improve personal popularity and gold content, rather than a simple "porter." Take the media industry as an example. If you just write some junk articles, you can earn tens of thousands of yuan a month even if you write 20 articles a day because of diligence. However, the quality of your article is too poor, and it has no characteristics, which can't attract fans' appreciation and attention, and will eventually be ruthlessly eliminated by the market. On the contrary, if your content is deep, distinctive and professional, your fans will grow more and more, and even there will be a geometric growth rate. At that time, you will still write only one article a day, but the effect is several times that of before. This is not that your working hours have increased, but that your popularity and gold content have increased. It's a pity that most people often can't stick to the previous period of accumulating contacts and brands, and they are on the road to success.

It can be seen that time is only a variable of the success formula, not the only variable. Successful people are not "porters" of time, they know how to invest their own value first.

Myth 2: The time is absolutely the same, so you don't need to consider whether to do it in the morning or at night.

The time is the same, one minute is one minute, but what about the same minute? How come? What kind of mentality do you have? This is a different world.

In the above formula, output = time × unit time benefit, in which benefit or efficiency is the most critical.

For example, when you do the most important work, you do the least important work, the former is valuable and the latter is almost zero. For example, writers write novels, and this hour is to generate income. If this hour is busy looking for something, then this hour is wasted.

In addition, when to do it is also very important. For example, generally speaking, when a person just gets up in the morning, his efficiency is the highest, because his energy is restored after a sleep, but if he has been busy all day and comes home tired, the same hour is often inefficient.

"Why do elites have time to control" tells us that the 2-3 hours after getting up early are best used to do the work with the highest income or the most energy-consuming, such as writing articles for writers and visiting salesmen (of course, you can also go out after dinner, but no one will receive you too early). When it's time to go to work, don't open your mailbox in a hurry, let alone chat with your colleagues. Even, work units should not hold meetings in the morning, because most meetings are not as effective as actual work. The meeting can be arranged in the afternoon.

In the afternoon, our work efficiency actually dropped significantly. At this time, you can receive emails, hold meetings, update and publish your articles, or do some mindless procedural activities.

However, many of us just made a mistake. We didn't do the most important and brain-consuming thing after getting up early. On the contrary, we hung around all morning and found ourselves inefficient in the afternoon. The result of course is that we can't compete with those elites.

Slash elites never spend time on average. They will arrange the most important part-time job at the earliest, at least in the morning. You can do those relatively easy things in the afternoon. Because of their time arrangement and time efficiency, they can do more things than others in the same time.

Myth 3: People who do part-time jobs are certainly not as excellent and dedicated as those who only do full-time jobs?

This view equates part-time jobs with amateurs and low quality, but we will be surprised to find that most successful people from all walks of life are often proficient in more than one professional field. For example, Leonardo da Vinci is an excellent painter and a first-class scientist and inventor. He has dabbled in more than a dozen fields. We may not reach the height of Leonardo da Vinci's genius, but if we are careful enough, it is feasible to work part-time in two or three fields.

Some people compare part-time jobs with professionals and come to the conclusion that part-time jobs are definitely not as good as full-time jobs. Actually, this conclusion is one-sided.

First of all, part-time and full-time jobs are not the basis for distinguishing grades. Who says part-time job is not as good as full-time job? Success depends on ability, not identity.

Secondly, part-time workers may not be less committed than full-time workers. According to the above formula, we can see that at the same time, your efficiency per unit time determines the output. Some full-time employees are not serious about their work attitude, muddle along every day, or have insufficient ability, and their output is still very low, which is not as good as those part-time employees who are interested, motivated and capable.

Third, interest is the driving force of work. A person who works part-time because of his hobbies is often much more enthusiastic than someone who is not interested. He doesn't think paying and working is a burden, but enjoys it, so he is more efficient.

Finally, part-time workers have a greater sense of urgency. Traditionally, full-time employees have a greater sense of urgency, and part-time employees can do or not, so they will fish for three days and dry their nets for two days. This sentence has certain rationality, but it is not entirely true. Because full-time professionals have the pressure to make money, but it is also easy to stand still and indulge in the advantages of full-time professionals. On the contrary, part-time workers will have more motivation and urgency to learn and improve when they know that their starting point is low.

Therefore, part-time job does not mean inefficiency. Those who think that taking a part-time job is inferior or doing nothing. In fact, you lost from the beginning.

There is also a phenomenon that people with the above mentality often feel guilty when doing part-time jobs, so they are very worried and always think, "Oh, I have spent all my time doing this. What should I do in this bank?" Will it be taken away by others? As a result, they become inattentive, which is of course inefficient.

In this regard, you must rule out the idea that "full-time comes first, and part-time jobs are only second-class citizens". Remember: a dedicated person is not a person who only does one job, but when it comes time to do a job, he will concentrate on it.

From the perspective of time management, in fact, as long as you clearly distinguish between eight hours and hours outside, if you go to work full-time and work part-time, you should not feel guilty at all. Remember, everything you do is to serve the people, which is glorious!

Myth 4: Work is work, entertainment is entertainment, and rest is rest.

Those who complain about lack of time have a strange phenomenon, that is, their amateur "fun" will never be mistreated or excluded. After coming home from work, they will still "take time" to watch TV, brush their mobile phones and play games. If friends invite them, they will definitely "take time" to go to the appointment and stay up all night before going home.

Why do these people have no time to take part-time jobs, study and fight for their own future, but they can "take time" to entertain themselves?

It's very simple, because they think that "entertainment" is an indispensable "necessity", while part-time work or study is not "necessity".

In psychology, this contradictory phenomenon actually reflects the conflict between what one really wants and what one should do. On the one hand, we rationally understand that we should take part-time jobs and study, but on the other hand, we prefer to immerse ourselves in those nutritious entertainment activities or even be in a daze. However, in order to eliminate our guilt, we must find an excuse for our actions. Then, the excuse is-"no time" and "too busy". Here, we leave the responsibility to our jobs, our customers, bosses and colleagues. However, your boss will definitely not agree with this. He must have thought, "Please, when did I let you work overtime? When did I stop you from charging part-time jobs? "

Then, why are we so willing to squeeze out precious spare time for entertainment, but we just don't want to spend time doing more other work?

The answer lies in our "characterization" of time.

Strictly speaking, working hours and spare time are actually the same, and there is no difference. They can be used for work and entertainment. However, in order to ensure the work results, human beings invented the work system and provided attendance and other measures. Therefore, we have gradually become accustomed to the "nine to five" working hours mode. As soon as we get off work or have a holiday, we will immediately change our identities. In this regard, we give ourselves the most legitimate reason-"work is work, entertainment is entertainment, and rest is rest." When it comes to "non-work" time, we will subconsciously indulge ourselves and feel that we must have a good rest at this time.

However, this concept is not completely correct.

First of all, time is not equal to the result. This point has been reflected in the above formula, so I won't repeat it here.

Secondly, it is understandable that we can't completely separate time. After work, you may be called by the leader to work overtime, or you may be called by the leader to drink and socialize. So, is this seemingly entertaining drinking chat entertainment or work? Obviously, this is still work.

Third, can entertainment make you successful? We don't deny the positive role of entertainment, but as we all know, pure entertainment is not enterprising. What can change your future destiny must be work and study. Some people spend too much time on entertainment and get nothing.

Finally, whether it is work or pleasure, only happiness is right. You hate work, and of course you don't like to work overtime voluntarily, but what if you like this job very much? So, is this work or pleasure? A writer said: He succeeded because others went to movies and bars, while he coded at home. He doesn't think it's a hard job. On the contrary, he feels very happy. He also felt that the three or four hours in the evening passed too fast to sleep.

Another example is that everyone likes to play games. Some players don't feel tired after playing for ten hours every day. However, for those professional players who take "substitute training" as their profession, these ten hours are simply a kind of torture. If it weren't for the money, they wouldn't want to play for another minute.

It can be seen that many people don't really have time, but don't want to spend time and squeeze time to work part-time. On the contrary, people who really love their part-time jobs will not feel the loss of time because they regard this part-time job as a kind of "entertainment". This kind of happiness in concentration is called "flow". When we are in a state of flow, we will not feel uncomfortable, but will feel happy and have a slight addiction tendency. If you have never experienced this feeling, it only means that you have not found something you like to do. So, go and find it, and you will find it!

Conclusion:

Those who complain that they don't have enough time to hire people, in fact, you either lack time management ability or don't do part-time work and study hard at all, and the latter ratio is higher.

Time needs to be squeezed, as long as you are willing to squeeze, it will always be there. Unfortunately, too many people are only willing to squeeze out time for entertainment, recreation or even daze, but they are unwilling to invest their future with fragmented time. Those "slash winners" or "diversified operators" not only know the importance of part-time, but also love their part-time jobs and regard part-time jobs as their own entertainment, even the only entertainment.

That's why the gap between these two types of people is getting bigger and bigger.

Attitude is everything. How you spend your time depends entirely on how you view your life and value.

The rest of my life is very short If I don't work hard at this time, it will make the old man sad!

$\? ; ? `