Is it recommended to publicize the interview questions of civil servants who lead their children?

Seriously, after I saw the announcement of the proposed employment of Changjiang Design Group, I was not excited at all about the avant-garde behavior of this unit, that is, "open the relationship between the applicant and the leader of the applicant unit and take the initiative to accept social supervision." On the contrary, I am more desperate. Under the current recruitment method of state-owned enterprises, "leading children compete with non-leading children". Is there any doubt about the result?

Generally speaking, people who can be leaders prove that their quality is higher. Leading a family has superior conditions and can provide better educational security for children. Comparatively speaking, children are more likely to become talents. The situation around me seems to prove this conclusion. As the old saying goes, a dragon gives birth to a dragon, a phoenix gives birth to a phoenix, and a mouse son makes a hole. It contains some dialectical truths.

If the leader's children appear on the candidate list, objectively speaking, it is not surprising. On the emergence of strength, the family stands out. Even for an important state-owned enterprise like Changjiang Design Group, the children of the leaders happen to appear on the candidate list of the leading unit. Except envy, ordinary people should not be jealous.

This is, of course, the good wish of ordinary people and the rational thinking of the ignorant. Objectively speaking, it cannot be wrong. However, this desire and rationality must be based on the fact that the leading children are really excellent and the recruitment of leading units is relatively fair. Without these two foundations, it must be self-deception to insist on such desire and rationality.

Unfortunately, however, these two foundations are extremely fragile and unreliable, and they cannot support people's kindness. Because the leading children are generally excellent does not mean that the "leading children are excellent", the fair recruitment of state-owned enterprises has not been generally recognized at this stage. Black-box greeting is a routine operation. Every time the issue of fair recruitment arouses people's sensitive nerves.

As you can imagine, how can such a fragile foundation not arouse people's doubts? In this case, the first thing people realize is not the courage and responsibility of the recruiting unit to open the relationship between candidates and leaders, but the first thing they feel is that the recruiting unit is fearless and I am overbearing. I don't know what others think, but I feel the chill brought by publicity anyway. This is not like publicity for social supervision, it is simply a hard green pass!

The recruitment of Changjiang Design Group has been basically settled. If there is no accident, the children of the leaders will soon be employed smoothly. The voice of social doubt can't make recruitment start again. In order to calm the supervisor's doubts, the recruiting unit needs to disclose more real evidence. If this matter ends quietly and fruitlessly, what kind of despair will the so-called "openness and leadership" recruitment "progress" leave?