Is the cause of business closure the boss or the employees? Why?

The main reason must be the boss! Of course, management also has unshirkable responsibilities!

As can be seen from the above cases, the most direct cause of such problems is the wrong decisions of the boss. The boss plays a vital role in the development of the company, especially the direction of the company's development. When the boss When a decision that is not conducive to the company's development direction is made, if other executives do not stop it and eventually cause problems in the company, the first person responsible must be the boss, and the second person responsible is the company's executives.

Many people may say that employees actually account for a large part. After all, if the company is not running well, it may also be due to employee operational problems, but managing employees is the job of the management. Poor management is The management has the main responsibility. Just like the boss who earns the most profits from the company has to bear the greatest responsibility for the company's development, employees are more responsible for execution.

This problem is a bit big, so based on your question, let me analyze several factors that are causing the current business failures:

First, the collapse of Chinese companies is generally due to the wrong decisions of the bosses. , causing the company to collapse. Because most of China's private enterprises are locomotive-type enterprises.

For example, "LeTV", "Yurun Group", "Delong", etc.

The core personnel of some companies take away the core technology that the company relies on for survival, causing the company to die. For example, "Storm Group"

"Skyworth TV", etc.

Second, the development of enterprises cannot keep up with the pace of the times. In the stage of rapid industrial development, enterprises must keep up and expand blindly. As a result, the company's capital turnover is poor and eventually it dies.

Third, diversified development is an inducement for companies to die quickly.

If a private enterprise encounters such a bankruptcy, it is of course the responsibility of the boss, who has nothing to do with the employees. Just answer in three words, because the boss is an "investor", and all assets will be disposed of after the bankruptcy. The income still belongs to the boss, and the employees cannot get it. Regarding how to deal with and arrange the living expenses of the employees for a period of time in the future, the boss should also provide necessary compensation for expenses in accordance with relevant government policies.

Here is an analysis of the reasons for the collapse of private companies. Most of the reasons are because the company's products do not adapt to the market, are aging and single, and there is no marketable market demand for the development and output of new products. The boss's thinking is rigid. In terms of technical talents, they are unwilling to make great efforts to introduce them into the market. Whether they are elites in the corporate design and R&D departments or technical workers in front-line positions, there is a shortage of successors. Over time, the company is in a long-term loss situation. It lacks funds, cannot buy materials, cannot pay wages and all dues, and the boss neither discusses with the backbone nor proactively finds ways to save the embarrassing situation. It is natural for it to go bankrupt. No wonder. staff.

According to the analysis of the question, even if labor discipline is loose among employees and the work is ineffective, it is also your boss's responsibility. The management is chaotic and the system is not strict. Why doesn't your boss work hard to improve management? This business is yours, not someone else's. Therefore, there is no point in blaming the employees, and the bosses should bear all the blame. No matter what your boss's plans are in the future, whether to transfer the business or start a new one, he should reflect deeply and learn lessons. There is an old saying in enterprises: With strong enterprise planning, relying on employees to run the enterprise and giving full play to everyone's intelligence and talents, it is true that the boss will not be so strenuous.

Then we need to analyze the reasons for business failure: Generally speaking, there are the following points:

1. External factors. Economic crisis, recession, and changes in market demand have resulted in unsaleable products and declining production. When encountering such problems, due to general environmental reasons, if the company does not respond well, bankruptcy is inevitable

Second, the reasons for the business owner. A weak sense of responsibility, insufficient personal management capabilities, etc. may lead to bankruptcy

3. Insufficient funds, the company is short of money, or like many companies recently, they only know how to go public, or blindly expand capital, resulting in Insolvent.

4. Internal reasons of the enterprise, such as major management problems.

Other uncontrollable factors, such as natural and man-made disasters, etc.

In short, the failure of a company is closely related to the general environment, industry factors, and the operational capabilities of the company’s leaders and executives. A small employee is not enough to go bankrupt and does not have that much energy.

Employees in an enterprise mainly work. After the management makes a decision, if they want you to go east, then go east, if they want you to go west, then go west. If you say the enterprise eventually fails, who will be responsible. The employees have very little ability and almost no responsibility.

Of course, if employees burn down a company and close it down, otherwise, employees really don’t have the ability to bring a company down. Of course, some people say that there are too many employees, too many people, too much money, too many moths, etc. These are also defects in the system design of corporate decision-makers, and there are problems with supervision or execution

Recently, Netizens asked, is it the boss or the employees who cause the company to close down? Why? In this regard, we believe that there are various reasons for business failure, including external factors and bosses' reasons. Employees' reasons are not important. Therefore, if a company goes bankrupt, who will be held responsible? I think it is mainly the boss and has little to do with the employees.

I remember that when Huawei was in its early days, because the research and development funds for a project exceeded the budget, and the company's cash flow was drying up, Ren Zhengfei asked people everywhere to find connections, hoping that banks could lend money. As a result, we encountered setbacks. Seeing that the company was about to die, Ren Zhengfei told the old employees that if the company went bankrupt, you could continue to find a job, but I was going to jump off the building. This shows that the boss bears the main responsibility for the collapse of the company, and even the middle-level cadres only have secondary responsibility.

I have personally experienced several business failures. If I see who is responsible for the business failures, the boss or the employees, I think the main responsibility lies with the boss. So, what mistakes will the boss make when running a business: First, there will be mistakes in strategic layout. I know a boss who does not understand environmental protection technology. He believes that the future development of the environmental protection field will be very promising, so he does not hesitate to switch to the field of environmental protection and has recruited many outstanding talents in related majors, hoping to use his Environmental protection companies become bigger and stronger and have the opportunity to go public for financing.

After a few years, it turned out that the environmental protection industry is not easy to operate. It is true that the country attaches great importance to the environmental protection industry. However, in addition to technical support from universities, environmental protection enterprises also need to gather a large number of high-tech talents. More importantly, there is a large amount of mobility. funds, and relevant qualifications. As a result, after five or six years of opening the environmental protection company, the boss burned tens of millions of assets and could only declare the company closed. From this case, we can see that the boss is the strategic decision-maker, and employees can only follow behind and do their part. Once strategic decisions are made incorrectly, the company will slide to the edge of bankruptcy.

Second, the boss’s wrong decisions will push the company to the edge of decline or bankruptcy. For example, Wang Jianlin of Wanda is relatively familiar with commercial real estate, but if a company wants to develop, it must get involved in several other areas. However, Wang Jianlin frequently changed the leadership of Wanda E-commerce, and these people were all professional operators. They were hired by Wang Jianlin to do e-commerce for him. However, Wang Jianlin just likes laymen to command experts and has to ask him for everything. According to the report, Wanda has never been able to develop in the e-commerce field. Therefore, the boss's decision-making is the key, and employees have no influence on the boss at all. If the company's performance is poor or bankrupt, can the responsibility be placed on the employees?

Third, for enterprises, employees are recruited by the boss, and executives are also hired by the boss. Many business owners like to arrange their classmates to work in their companies, arrange their customers' families to join them, and place their relatives in leadership positions. He even shouted that he would never let his children take over, but he broke his promise. The entire enterprise is "family-run", and even if the boss wants to survive the fittest, it will be troublesome. As a result, everyone is unable to work hard and people are distracted. After the company eats up all its capital, it will be on the verge of bankruptcy. This is a problem caused by the boss's employment and management. If the company fails, it cannot be regarded as the employees' responsibility.

There are many reasons for the failure of a company, both external and internal. However, we have to say whether the failure of a company is the responsibility of the boss or the employees. We believe that the main responsibility lies with the boss, because the boss is at the helm. It is necessary to do a good job in the strategic development planning of the enterprise and guide the enterprise to areas with better benefits; it is also necessary to manage the enterprise well and let the subordinates give full play to their specialties and abilities. More importantly, many companies have serious family problems. They hire people who are related to the boss. They hang around in the company all day long. The bosses are also to blame for the collapse of these companies. If the boss makes mistakes in employment and management, it will directly Causing companies to slide into recession.

If your company loses a large number of employees and faces bankruptcy, there must be something wrong with your managers and your management methods.

At present, among domestic small and medium-sized enterprises, most are family businesses or partnerships between friends. The business goals of a small business are determined by the founders themselves.

These goals are often set around the interests of recent years, which leads the founders not to seriously think about the future of the company, but only to consider whether they can make money in the present. Such business methods can only be simply called "doing business" and cannot really be called "enterprise management".

2. Self-cultivation of the boss

"Entrepreneur cost" refers to the cost that the boss of the company himself brings to the company. There is a good saying, a soldier is in raging state, and a general in raging group is in raging state.

Many bosses of private enterprises have turned themselves into the "emperors" of the enterprise. They have the final say in everything, and all employees have become execution machines. However, defects in the personal factors of entrepreneurs will add a heavy cost burden to the enterprise.

Many leaders have always been self-centered, which will greatly reduce the team's combat capabilities and increase high hidden costs.

I remember once saying something to a boss who complained about the company's lack of talent: "What your company lacks is not talent, but the wisdom to discover and make good use of talent."

3. Without truly talented and hard-working employees

A company cannot build a team or an organizational system if it relies entirely on the boss alone, so entrepreneurs become stormtrooper captains and put out fires. The team leader cannot rely on the organization to capture opportunities and rely on the organization to implement strategies.

It has not built an organizational system that does not rely on individuals, cannot complete the transformation from opportunity growth to organizational growth, and from personal capabilities to organizational capabilities. It does not understand how to motivate talents and relies only on salary and assessment. Go manage. This is the key to small businesses not surviving long and becoming big.

In short, I think the boss is mainly responsible for the company's collapse. Although the employees are also responsible, it is also a problem with the boss's decision-making and a management error. What do you think about this?

Both bosses and employees are responsible for the collapse of a company. If you have to choose one to take the blame, the answer must be the boss.

As the top decision-maker of the enterprise, the boss has all the power to lay out strategies, make decisions, and select and employ people. There are three main reasons why companies fail: failure to keep up with the times, poor decision-making, and employee ability. Each of them points directly to the boss.

1. Wrong strategic layout will cause companies to fail to keep up with the times and be eliminated by the market

Nokia, the former mobile phone giant, did not make a strategic layout when smart phones appeared. Sticking to its own Symbian system and ignoring Google's Android system and Apple's IOS system, it finally fell from the altar in the era of full bloom of smartphones.

Until it hit rock bottom and was acquired by Microsoft, Nokia’s executives did not realize their mistakes. As Nokia executives said: “We don’t know what we did wrong, but we just lost. ”

As the boss of a company, he is unable to see, see clearly, or understand the development trends of the times, and tries to hide his strategic laziness through tactical diligence. After seeing, seeing, and understanding, we found that the company has been abandoned by the times and has become an outcast of the market, and can only embark on the road of bankruptcy.

At the strategic level, most companies do not allow employees to participate, and some companies even explicitly prohibit junior employees from raising any strategic issues with the company. Even if employees put forward ideas about strategic layout, they may not be adopted by the boss. Even if the strategy is proved to be wrong after being adopted, it is not the employees’ fault because the boss is the layout maker. If the boss adopts the wrong strategic layout, it means that The boss has a bigger problem.

Enterprises are faced with choices at three-way intersections or even N-way intersections almost every day. Some choices are insignificant, while some choices are related to the life and death of the company. Faced with such a choice, it is the boss who makes the decision most of the time. The employees below can just follow the boss's decision. Once a decision is made wrong, they will naturally be inseparable from the boss who made the judgment.

There are also some company bosses who will allow employees to participate in voting on decisions. When errors are discovered after implementing the results of employee voting, the boss will blame the employees, and this is just escaping responsibility. That’s all.

A boss who leaves the fate of his company to his employees is the biggest culprit of the company's collapse.

Once the decision-making judgment is wrong and the company is on the wrong path, the stronger the employees' working ability, the closer the company will be to bankruptcy. And all of this is inseparable from the "credit" of the top decision-maker - the boss.

Assuming that the boss’s strategic layout and key decisions are correct, the company’s collapse due to employees’ work ability problems is ultimately the boss’s greatest responsibility.

Leaders are promoted and appointed by the boss, while junior employees are recruited by the leader. The boss made a mistake in selecting and employing people, resulting in leadership skills that were not suitable for the position, and recruiting employees who did not meet the company's requirements. This in turn resulted in the assigned tasks not being done well, causing the company to miss out on good opportunities. The fundamental problem still lies with the leadership.

The boss practices nepotism in selecting and employing people, leading the company to become a "family-style" company and shutting out capable people, which is also an important reason for the decline of the company.

The boss is the company's highest decision-maker, with power ranging from strategic planning to personnel selection. If the company he leads eventually collapses, the boss is undoubtedly the biggest problem.

Even if the employee's work ability cannot keep up with the company's pace, or the employee gives wrong suggestions, as long as he passes the test monitored by the boss, it is not the employee's problem.

In summary, when a company fails, the biggest reason lies with the boss.

If the employee is not good, the boss can replace him. So it’s still the boss’s problem

There is no doubt: blame the boss

1. The madam of small and medium-sized enterprises is responsible for recruiting, employing, training, organizing and operating the company!

2. The boss decides the direction, profit model, business logic, investment and financing

3. Even if employees have incidental responsibilities, it is still a decision-making issue for the boss or leader. If the employees do not do well, you Just fire him and replace him!

The failure of the company must be the boss’s fault.

It is difficult to run a business, but it mainly depends on the boss’s thinking and structure.

Many companies are in good industries and even make decent profits, but they will go bankrupt because their bosses are nepotistic and prefer to listen to others.

Many bosses have one characteristic: they listen to others and believe in others, and many of them are stubborn. It is difficult to listen to other people's opinions.