Is there something fishy about the examination of public institutions?

As a person who is still on the way to the exam, I think the exam in public institutions is still relatively formal.

First of all, in the written test, it is popular to say that even if you want to get involved, you have to pass the written test yourself, and you did see several positions that originally looked like radish pits. As a result, the radish written test was too poor to get in, but someone else got in.

Secondly, in the interview, there is a certain error in the above statement. At present, examiners in public institutions usually take turns, that is, in a big province, a few people are randomly selected and asked if they are free by phone. If they do this, they will be examiners. If not, they won't go. In this case, it is difficult to get tricky through simple relationships, and in most cases, your competitors are similar to you, so you still have to rely on your own efforts.

To sum up, it may be tricky, but the bigger the city, the bigger the place, and the less this phenomenon, because the stricter the control,

Finally, I hope everyone can log in successfully.