Mudanjiang security guard poisoned 1 1 pet dog in the community and was sentenced to 3 years in prison. What responsibilities should the property bear?

The property needs to bear secondary responsibility. After all, the mastermind is the community security and other owners. Therefore, most of the property is the responsibility of lax supervision, so it has not been punished as it should. But it also severely criticized the property, hoping to strictly control the various behaviors of security guards when recruiting security guards in the future. Security guards, including community owners, have indeed violated the interests of other owners and brought bad feelings to other owners. Although the money was paid to the other party in time, it had a bad influence on the whole community.

The reason why security guards and owners do this is for the sake of the green environment of the community. Because these dogs often defecate on the lawn at will, in order not to be punished, they collude with other owners, one person buys rat poison, and the other security guard chooses to mix rat poison with corresponding food to achieve their own goals. However, both of them were also suspected of breaking the law, so they were sentenced to more than three years in prison.

Although most people say that this punishment is very serious, the poisoning behavior of the two people is intentional, which seriously endangers the public safety of the community and also constitutes the crime of throwing dangerous substances. It stands to reason that he should be sentenced to more than three years 10 years. However, the two suspects confessed their illegal and criminal acts and got the understanding of other owners, so they were given a lighter punishment, which also showed that they did not have a corresponding understanding of the law.

However, the appearance of this incident can also remind other owners to keep dogs in a civilized way. Even if they go out for a walk, they should control the dog's behavior. They can't let the dog defecate at will, and they have to tie the dog on a leash. Only in this way can they be regarded as qualified dog owners. If such a thing brings bad influence to other residents, the consequences are unimaginable, and even people face retaliation, it will not be worth the loss, and even bear the pain of losing a dog. Presumably this is not the result that everyone wants to see.