Job Recruitment Website - Zhaopincom - The teaching staff of Leshan Art Experimental School

The teaching staff of Leshan Art Experimental School

As of the last semester in 2014, the school had 25 teaching classes and 1,050 students. There are 165 teaching staff: 78 subject teachers, 18 art teachers, 39 life teachers; 1 special-grade teacher in Sichuan Province, 3 provincial key teachers, and more than 30 city and county-level key teachers and subject leaders. There are also 3 external special-grade teachers and 9 education experts. The school always adheres to expert navigation and famous teachers to ensure first-class education and teaching quality.

The school takes basic education as the main body and features art education; it takes "six years of primary school to influence a lifetime, and three years of junior high school to change life" as its school running philosophy; it aims to deliver freshmen with excellent morals and academics to key high schools. The training goal is to cultivate new seedlings with both moral and artistic qualities for the Art High School; with "two guarantees and two characteristics" (that is, ensuring first-class teaching quality, ensuring first-class service quality, and creating solid educational characteristics and distinctive artistic characteristics) For the characteristic goals of running a school. The school adheres to Mr. Song Xiaowei’s philosophy of running a school that “the success of a child is the success of a parent’s life, and the success of a student is the ultimate success of a school.” The school shouts the slogan “Send a child to make a family successful” and insists on running a small-scale school. Adhere to small class teaching, adhere to the school running strategy of "distance, precision, and appropriateness", overcome all obstacles, work hard, step by step, make a leap year by year, and are moving towards the school running goal of "Leshan is top-notch, Sichuan is first-class, and the country is famous".

The organizers of the school do not pursue personal gains as their goals, but regard social benefits as their value orientation; they do not judge success or failure based on the size of the school, but judge success or failure based on the quality of education; they do not pursue short-term goals. Sensational effect, but long-term social impact.