A set of extremely difficult logical reasoning interview questions

A set of extremely difficult logical reasoning interview questions

From elementary school, junior high school, high school to university and even work, we often see test questions. The test questions are issued by schools or various sponsors. A standard for assessing certain knowledge and abilities. So what are the characteristics of generally good test questions? Below is a set of super difficult logical reasoning interview questions that I have collected for you. Welcome to read, I hope you will like it.

1. A certain provincial education committee organized subordinate universities to jointly develop a special management software. The following arrangements have been made for the participating universities:

①School a Among school d, school e, and school f, at least one school will not participate;

③Both school b and school c will participate, or neither school will participate; < /p>

④Only one school, D school or C school, can participate;

⑤If E school does not participate, then C school will participate and D school will not participate;

⑥A school must participate .Ask how the arrangement turned out? Write down the reasoning process.

2. Who is the thief? (Use standard compound propositional reasoning to draw conclusions)

A theft occurred in a company. After investigation, the following situation was obtained:

a. The thief is A or B.

b. If A is a thief, the time of committing the crime is not before midnight.

c. The company lights have been turned off at midnight.

d. If B’s testimony is correct, then the time of committing the crime was before midnight.

e. B’s testimony is incorrect only if the lights in the company were not turned off at midnight.

3. There are five employees in the company office. New Year's Day is coming, who will be on duty on New Year's Day? The opinions everyone agreed upon can be summarized into the following four points:

A. If e is on duty, then one of a and c will come.

b. Only when e comes, d will come.

c. If b does not come, then a does not come either.

d. If c comes, then b will come too.

Now that we know that d must be on duty, I ask: Will b be on duty?

4. We know that the following situations are true:

(1) At least one of the four persons A, B, C and D is the perpetrator

( 2) A’s testimony is correct only if neither A nor C is the perpetrator

(3) It does not mean that B is the perpetrator if A’s testimony is correct. Question: Who is the perpetrator? (Write the reasoning process)

5. So that the following situation is true:

(1) If A is not the murderer, then B is either the murderer or an insider .

(2) Only if B is a strong person, he can enter the crime scene

(3) If B is the murderer, he must have entered the murder scene

p>

(4) Only B has entered the murder scene, and he is an insider

(5) B is thin. Question: Among A and B, who is the murderer? (Write the reasoning process)

6. Four people a, b, c, and d make the following judgments on whether A and B are guilty:

a. If A is guilty, Then B is also guilty.

b. A is guilty, but B is not guilty.

c. Either A is guilty or B is guilty.

d. B is not guilty.

Afterwards, I learned that only one of the four people was wrong. I asked: Who is guilty? (Write down the reasoning process)

7. Suppose: Proposition a: If A is not a carpenter, then B is a masonry;

Proposition b: Only B is a masonry, and A is a carpenter;

Proposition c contradicts a. Please list the truth tables of the three propositions a, b, and c, and answer when b and c are both true, is A a carpenter and B a mason?

8. Use truth tables Answer: When the following judgments a, b, and c are not true, can it be judged "whether Xiao Jin was elected as the monitor?" Can it be judged "whether Xiao Zhao was elected as the study committee member?"

(1) Xiao Jin was not elected as the monitor or Xiao Zhao was elected as the study committee member.

(2) Xiao Zhao was elected as the study committee member.

(3) Xiao Jin is elected monitor or Xiao Zhao is elected study committee member. ,

9. The truth table proves:

a. As long as Xiao Wang is advanced, Xiao Li should also be advanced.

b. Xiao Wang did not become an advanced person, but Xiao Li did.

Question: Does a imply b?

10. Why can a correct syllogism whose conclusion is a universal affirmative judgment only be in the first figure aaa?

11. Why are the correct conclusions derived from the second figure of the syllogism negative judgments?

12. Can the major term, minor term and middle term of a correct syllogism be extended twice at the same time? Why?

13. Taking e as the minor premise and a as the major premise, can the conclusion be necessarily drawn? Why?

14. If the conclusion of a valid syllogism is universal, the middle term cannot be extended twice. Why?

15. What kind of correct syllogism is it that the major terms are distributed in the premises but not in the conclusion?

Expanded content: Interview questions and answers

Question 1: Why do you want to leave your current position?

A. Other colleagues think that I am a popular person in front of the boss, so they exclude me everywhere.

B. I am very disappointed with the result of the salary increase, which is completely out of proportion to my efforts.

C. The boss is unwilling to authorize, and the work is restricted everywhere. His hands are tied and his feet are tied, making it difficult to do things.

D. The company’s operating conditions are not good, and everyone is panicked.

Answer: More than half of the HR managers chose C, followed by D. Answering choice C can show that the applicant is ambitious, capable, and hopes to be given more responsibilities. Choice D is because the reason for leaving the job is an objective external factor that cannot be changed by the individual. Therefore, the interviewer will not have too many doubts about the individual's ability or work performance.

Question 2: How much do you know about our company?

A. Your company was the top stock market leader for eight months last year.

B. Your company has been ranked first among the “Companies Job Seekers Most Want to Enter” by XX Magazine for three consecutive years.

C. I’m not sure. Could you please give me some introduction?

D. Your company intends to change its strategy and strengthen OEM cooperation with major foreign manufacturers. The part of its own brand will be through overseas distributors.

Answer: Mostly D. The reason is simple, they want job seekers to have a real understanding of the job they are applying for, not just come here for the job.

Question 3: What is the most important factor to consider when you are looking for a job?

A. The company’s vision and product competitiveness.

B. The company attaches great importance to employee career planning and humanized management.

C. Whether the nature of the work allows me to develop my strengths and continue to grow.

D. Reasonable treatment and supervisor’s management style.

Answer: Most of them are C, because the company is looking for people who have good job performance and can truly contribute, rather than people who come purely for fame and profit.

Question 4: Why should we admit you?

A. Because I firmly believe that I am better than others.

B. Because I have a strong ambition and want to grow together with your company.

C. You can clearly see my dedicated work attitude from the objective data presented in my past work performance.

D. I have been working in this industry for 8 years, and my rich network of contacts is my greatest asset.

Answer: The ideal answer to this question is C. How do you let the other person see your goodness? It is difficult to convince the other party with eloquence alone. Therefore, it is the most ideal answer if you can use objective figures and specific work results to assist the explanation from the content of your resume or previous answers.

Question 5: Please talk about your greatest personal characteristics.

A. I am very popular and have served as a member of the Welfare Committee for three consecutive years.

B. I have a high degree of persistence and will never give up until a satisfactory result is achieved.

C. I am very punctual. I have never been late since I started working.

D. My personality is very easy-going and I am recognized by everyone as a good gentleman.

Answer: The ideal answer to this question is B. Although A, C, and D all express the applicant's personality strengths, only B's answer, which is the best combination with work and work performance, is the answer that the interviewer is more interested in.

Question 6: "Please introduce yourself."

Ideas:

1. This is a required question in the interview.

2. The introduction content should be consistent with your resume.

3. Try to be as colloquial as possible in the way of expression.

4. Keep to the point and don’t talk about irrelevant or useless content.

5. The organization should be clear and the levels should be clear.

6. It is best to memorize it in writing in advance.

Question 7: "Talk about your family situation"

Ideas:

1. Kuang is helpful in understanding the applicant's personality, concepts, mentality, etc. This is the main reason why the recruiting unit asks this question.

2. Simply list the family population.

3. A warm and harmonious family atmosphere should be emphasized.

4. It is appropriate to emphasize the importance parents attach to their own education.

5. It is appropriate to emphasize the good condition of each family member.

6. It is appropriate to emphasize the support of family members for one’s work.

7. You should emphasize your sense of responsibility to your family.

Question 8: "What are your hobbies?"

Ideas:

1. Hobbies can reflect the applicant's personality and concepts to a certain extent. , mentality, this is the main reason why the recruiting unit asks this question.

2. It is best not to say that you have no hobbies.

3. Don’t say that you have those vulgar and unpleasant hobbies.

4. It is best not to say that you are limited to reading, listening to music, and surfing the Internet. Otherwise, the interviewer may suspect that the applicant has a withdrawn personality.

5. It is best to have some outdoor hobbies to "embellish" your image.

Question 9: "Who do you admire most?"

Ideas:

1. The person you admire most can reflect the applicant's personality to a certain extent. Concepts and mentality are the main reasons why the interviewer asks this question.

2. It is not appropriate to say that you don’t admire anyone.

3. It is not appropriate to say that you worship yourself.

4. It is not advisable to worship an illusory or unknown person.

5. It is not appropriate to say that you admire a person who has an obviously negative image.

6. Everyone you admire should have a relationship with the job you are applying for.

7. It is best to tell which qualities and ideas of the people you admire infect and inspire you.

Question 10: "What is your motto?"

Ideas:

1. The motto can reflect the applicant's personality, concepts, and Mentality, this is the main reason why the interviewer asks this question.

2. It is not appropriate to say mottos that cause bad associations.

3. It is not appropriate to say mottos that are too abstract.

4. It is not advisable to say a motto that is too long.

5. The motto should best reflect some of your excellent qualities.

6. "Only find ways for success, not excuses for failure"

Question 11: "Talk about your shortcomings"

Ideas:

p>

1. It is not appropriate to say that you have no shortcomings.

2. It is not appropriate to describe those obvious advantages as disadvantages.

3. It is not appropriate to mention shortcomings that seriously affect the job you are applying for.

4. It is not appropriate to mention shortcomings that make people feel uneasy and uncomfortable.

5. You can name some shortcomings that are "insignificant" to the job you are applying for, or even some shortcomings that appear to be shortcomings but are advantages from a work perspective.

Question 12: "Talk about a failure experience of yours"

Ideas:

1. It is not appropriate to say that you have no failure experience.

2. It is not appropriate to describe those obvious successes as failures.

3. It is not appropriate to talk about failure experiences that seriously affect the job you are applying for.

4. The result of the experience discussed should be failure.

5. It is advisable to explain that before failure, you were more confident and tried your best.

6. Explain that the failure was only due to external objective reasons.

7. After failure, pick yourself up quickly and face future work with more enthusiasm.

Question 13: "Why did you choose our company?"

Ideas:

1. The interviewer is trying to understand your motivation, desire and attitude towards applying for a job. attitude towards the job.

2. It is recommended to answer from the three perspectives of industry, enterprise and position.

3. I am very optimistic about the industry your company is in. I think your company attaches great importance to talents, and this job is very suitable for me. I believe I can do it well. "

Question 14: "If I hire you, how will you carry out your work? ”

Ideas:

1. If the applicant lacks sufficient understanding of the position he is applying for, it is best not to directly state the specific method of carrying out the work.

2. You can try to use roundabout tactics to answer, such as "First listen to the leader's instructions and requirements, then understand and become familiar with the relevant situation, then formulate a recent work plan and submit it to the leader for approval, and finally carry out work according to the plan. "

Question 15: "What will you do when you disagree with your superior? ”

Ideas:

1. Generally, you can answer like this: “I will give the superiors the necessary explanations and reminders. In this case, I will obey the superiors’ opinions.

"

2. If you are being interviewed by the general manager, and there is another manager for the position you are applying for, and the manager is not present at the time, you can answer this way: "For non-principle questions, I will I obey the opinions of my superiors and hope to report to higher-level leaders on major issues involving the interests of the company. "How can fresh graduates be qualified for the job if they lack experience?" "

Question 16: "Why should we hire you? ”

Ideas:

1. It is best for applicants to answer from the perspective of the recruiting unit.

2. Recruiting units will generally hire such applicants : Basically meet the conditions, interested in this *** group, and have enough confidence.

3. For example, "I meet your company's recruitment conditions based on my current skills, high sense of responsibility and Good adaptability and learning ability, fully qualified for this job. I very much hope to serve your company. If your company gives me this opportunity, I will definitely become the pillar of your company! "

Question 17: "What can you do for us? ”

Ideas:

1. In basic principle, “do what they like”.

2. It is best for applicants to “preemptively strike” before answering this question. , understand the role that the recruiting unit expects this position to play.

3. Applicants can answer this question based on their own understanding and their own advantages in the professional field.

18: “You are a fresh graduate and lack experience. How can you be qualified for this job? ”

Ideas:

1. If the recruiting unit asks this question to fresh graduate applicants, it means that the recruiting unit does not really care about “experience”. The key is how the candidates answer. .

2. The answer to this question should best reflect the applicant’s sincerity, wit, courage and dedication.

3. For example, “As a fresh graduate, you have work experience. There are indeed deficiencies in this aspect, so during my studies I have been taking advantage of various opportunities to work part-time in this industry. I also found that actual work is far richer and more complicated than book knowledge. However, I have a strong sense of responsibility, adaptability and learning ability, and I am quite diligent, so I can successfully complete various tasks during my part-time job, and I have benefited greatly from the experience I gained. Please rest assured that my school studies and part-time work experience make me qualified for this position. "

Question 19: "What kind of superior do you want to work with? ”

Ideas:

1. The applicant’s awareness of self-requirements can be judged through the applicant’s “hope” for the superior. This is both a trap and an opportunity.

2. It is best to avoid specific expectations for your superiors and talk more about your own requirements.

3. As a newcomer to society, I should demand more of myself as soon as possible. I should be familiar with the environment and adapt to it, and should not place any demands on the environment, as long as I can use my expertise. "

Question 20: "What was the reason for your resignation from your previous company? ”

Ideas:

1. The most important thing is: the applicant must convince the recruiting unit that the applicant’s “reason for leaving” in the previous unit is in this recruiting unit. Doesn’t exist.

2. Avoid making the “reason for resignation” too detailed and specific.

3. Do not include subjective negative feelings, such as “too lucky”, "Interpersonal relationships are complicated", "management is too chaotic", "the company does not value talents", "the company excludes our employees", etc.

4. But you cannot dodge or avoid, such as "I want to change." "Change of environment", "personal reasons", etc.

5. Do not involve your own negative personality traits, such as dishonesty, laziness, lack of responsibility, uneasy-going, etc.

6. Try your best Make the reasons explained add color to the applicant's personal image.

7. For example, "I left my job because this company went bankrupt." I have worked in the company for more than three years and have deep feelings. Since last year, due to sudden changes in the market situation, the company's situation has taken a turn for the worse. I feel regretful that I have reached this stage, but I still have to face it and find a stage where I can use my abilities again. "The same interview question does not have only one answer, and the same answer is not valid in any interview situation. The key is that after the applicant has mastered the rules, he can grasp the specific situation of the interview and consciously figure out the psychological background of the interviewer's question. , and then do what they like.

;