Briefly describe the dishonest behaviors and causes in the bidding process

What are the untrustworthy behaviors and causes in the bidding process? In order to enhance everyone's understanding, today this article will analyze them from the four perspectives of bidding agencies, bidders, bid evaluation committees and regulatory authorities. If you are interested, let’s take a look at the untrustworthy behavior and its causes!

1. The untrustworthy behavior and causes of the tendering agency

The tendering agency is an intermediary entrusted by two agencies, and it should serve as a link However, market dishonesty behaviors such as leapfrogging agents, "backdoor" agents, leaking information, inducing bid evaluations, illegal charges, bribing owners, and accepting bribes from bidders have occurred from time to time. The specific manifestations are in four aspects.

First, when accepting project registrations, agencies eliminate dissidents by reviewing potential bidders' performance, honors, social security payment status, etc., paving the way for the "favorite" to win the bid.

The second is to secretly manipulate the bidding documents, set thresholds privately, tailor the bidding documents to suit the situation, and formulate preferential clauses to give a "green light" to interested bidders.

The third is to persuade or force competitors to quit based on the owner’s intentions in violation of regulations.

The fourth is to act as the "spokesperson" for the owner, hinting and inducing the judges to select the intended winner during the bid evaluation; these are contrary to the principle of "intermediary neutrality".

The reason: The drive for profit makes principles and systems vulnerable, even if they violate criminal laws, they will not hesitate to do so.

2. The bidder’s dishonest behavior and its causes

The bidder is one of the most important subjects in market competition. Selecting the best to determine the winning bidder is a market rule and a necessity for the project. In this construction market where there are too many bidders, some bidders do not rely on integrity, strength and fair competition to win projects. Instead, they seek to win bids through bid-rigging, qualified recruitment, bribing owners, and bribery of judges. After winning the bid, they did not consider how to improve the quality of the project and accumulate credibility for their own development, but pursued maximizing immediate interests and subcontracted the winning project layer by layer and illegally. Because the "chain" of subcontracting and subcontracting is too long and interests are exploited at all levels, illegal phenomena such as wage arrears to migrant workers and "scumbag" projects have emerged.

3. The judges' dishonest behavior and its causes

The bid evaluation committee is established in accordance with the law and is supposed to perform its duties fairly and in accordance with the law. However, some judges "are entrusted by others and are chosen by others." "Used", during the bid evaluation process, if there are any situations that should be avoided but not avoided, leaving without authorization, violating bidding regulations when evaluating bids, contacting bidders through WeChat groups or privately, inducing bidders to clarify and make corrections, deliberately delaying the bid evaluation time, or being absent The signatures on the bid evaluation report were "threats" to increase remuneration requirements, etc.

The reason: a few judges have poor professional ethics, and there are flaws in the system design, and the rights and obligations of the judges are not equal.

IV. Untrustworthy behavior and causes of regulatory authorities

The supervisors appointed by the regulatory authorities change frequently, lack proper industry training, are unfamiliar with the business, and have weak supervision. There are also industry supervisors Departments are unwilling to enter the site for supervision and do not strictly perform their duties, resulting in an embarrassing situation of "strict requirements, loose supervision, many violations, and little accountability" in bidding.

What is the reason: There are too few people who dare to take responsibility and take on responsibilities; "Plant more flowers and less thorns, so as to retain favors and do things easily". There are more and more people who protect themselves and seek no faults. many.

For more information about engineering/service/purchasing tender document writing and production to improve the bid winning rate, you can click on the official website customer service at the bottom for free consultation: /#/?source=bdzd