Guide to Recruitment Examination of Inner Mongolia Institutions in 2020 —— How to solve the analogical reasoning problem of "a smiling tiger"?

Analogical reasoning is also a common question type in the examination of public institutions, and the general number of questions is about 5 to 10. Analogical reasoning is a topic that students like to do, because the number of words is small and effortless, but it is easy for students to entangle, and the correct rate is not high. The reasons for the low correct rate are as follows: First, we underestimate our enemies and find it not difficult; The second is that we didn't distinguish clearly the relationship between stem words when we did the problem; The third is that analogical reasoning is also a semi-common-sense topic, involving some common-sense topics. If you don't master it yourself, it's hard to do it right. In view of this, we should first attach importance to such topics and not underestimate the enemy. Secondly, we should pay attention to the accumulation of relations between words. The more laws we see, the greater the correct rate of correct answers to questions, and we should also pay attention to the accumulation of common sense. Third, and more importantly, how to distinguish the relationship between words. The logical relations of common words include sameness, difference, intersection and inclusion, and the verb relations include synonyms, antonyms, verb-object, subject-predicate, deviation and so on, as well as experience and theoretical common sense. However, no matter what the relationship between words is, we must adhere to the idea of solving problems first horizontally and then vertically, first as a whole and then locally. Next, we will give you a detailed introduction to this problem-solving idea:

1. Horizontal first, then vertical.

First of all, look at the relationship between words horizontally. When analyzing the relationship between words horizontally, when there are multiple comparison options that conform to the stem relationship, and then comparing vertically, there are more options for multiple-choice questions with the same point, that is, adhere to the optimal principle. Let's look at an example:

Example 1

Restraint: enthusiasm

A. Moisturizing: moistening throat B. Dispersing: attention

C. elimination: sound D. inversion: direction

Analysis: B. It is known that the "inhibition: enthusiasm" in the stem is a verb-object structure, and it is found that A, B, C and D are all satisfied. After longitudinal comparison, it can be concluded that the stem of the question reduces enthusiasm through inhibition, the item B reduces attention through dispersion, and A, C and D are not satisfied. Therefore, B is the correct answer.

2. First the whole, then the part.

"wholeness" refers to looking for the relationship between words as a whole; And "local" refers to the internal composition of each word. We know that analogical reasoning actually examines "the relationship between things", so we give priority to the overall relationship between terms, and only consider parts when they are not enough to exclude three options as a whole or when the whole is not obviously related. For example:

Example 2

Life and death: life and death

A. importance: urgency B. proximity: age

C. right or wrong: right or wrong D. good or bad: good or bad

Analysis: D. On the whole, the life and death of a word item are synonymous, and only two words in item D are synonymous, so D is chosen. If we get the title, we should first pay attention to the internal relationship of terms: "life" and "death" are antonyms; "Existence" and "death" are also antonyms. It turns out that all four options have such a relationship, and the correct answer cannot be selected. Therefore, we should adhere to the principle that the whole is superior to the part.

The topic of analogical reasoning is very similar to The Smiling Tiger, which seems simple but not easy. Therefore, on the basis of mastering problem-solving skills, students must do more problems, accumulate more rules, and pay attention to the accumulation of common sense at ordinary times, so as to grasp the problems that we don't spend much time and don't get high marks.