A new way of safeguarding rights, Binzhou women riding horses and dragging Mercedes-Benz to protect rights, what is the hidden story of the incident?

Because Mercedes-Benz had driven for 6, kilometers, the engine was scrapped. Later, the manufacturer asked her to replace the engine at her own expense. In recent years, there have been frequent incidents about automobile rights protection. Many people said that when protecting rights, the manufacturer could not get the due protection. Now it is really very difficult to protect automobile rights.

according to the rights-defending woman, he bought a Mercedes-Benz Gla2 on January 8, 219 with four years' money, and finally bought it for 23, yuan. However, he didn't expect to buy the car for less than a year. On October 1, the rights-defending woman said that when he drove out in the morning, the engine compartment of the car suddenly made a huge noise, and then the car slowly turned off and lost power, and stopped in the middle of the road. At that time, he was scared and thought it was crushed.

Later, when the woman got off the car and walked around the car for a week, nothing unusual was found, but the oil-leaking liquid began to drip under the engine compartment. After contacting the after-sales service, the rights-defending woman arranged for a trailer to tow the car to the 4s shop for inspection. On October 11th, the 4s shop informed that the engine had traces of water, so the store did not guarantee it, and the engine needed to be replaced by itself. The owner said that from August 12th to October 1th, The vehicle didn't have any trouble lights or any trouble tips. After driving for 6, kilometers now, it didn't even get the first warranty, but now it was told that it didn't even have a chance to get the warranty. On October 16th, the 4s shop called and told us that the manufacturer's appraisal result was that the engine was damaged by entering unknown liquid.

I think whether it is caused by the engine entering an unknown object or not, I think the manufacturer should replace it for her, and the consumer must be given a reasonable explanation.