What are the advantages and disadvantages of UG, PROE and CATIA?

It's hard to say it's good from an absolute point of view. CATIA is more suitable for large-scale projects. Our company makes molds and uses UG. I feel that UG is more convenient than CATIA in mold, but many customers (automobile companies) send 3D data based on CATIA.

Catia is not on the same level as ug and Proe. For example, catia is the United States, UG and proe are countries such as Britain, France and Europe.

Not in the same breath in terms of scale and strength.

Catia surfaces are powerful and have many modules. The research and development strength is strong, and two versions are launched a year. UG is almost a version every year, and it has not changed much.

Catia reverse function is also the best of the three, as well as DMU and so on. It's a long story

Pro/E is parameterized, with rigorous modeling ideas, many reference books, many online experts, many recruitment companies, and simple parts and assembly are more convenient for later modification. Surface has style, which absorbs many free-form surface modeling methods of CDRS. More functional. Mainly used in consumer electronics industry and its molds.

The disadvantage is that two-dimensional drawing is a bit troublesome, the modeling speed of complex parts and complex assembly is slow in the early stage, and the modification of parameters in the later stage will easily lead to the failure of updating, so the salary in UG is relatively low. CAE, motion analysis and machining are not strong points.

UG can participate in all, participate in all, participate in all and change all, and has flexible modeling ideas. There are not too many reference books, not as many online experts as Pro/E, and even fewer recruitment companies. If you are skilled in application, it is very convenient to modify complex parts and assembly later, and you can participate in all, participate in all and change all. It is really impossible to completely transform a single part without affecting the whole.

The surface has the integration of Imageware, and the free-form surface has good modeling effect and stronger surface function. Mainly used in the design, analysis and manufacture of automobile, aerospace and related molds.

There are also advantages: CAE simply integrates NX Nestran and I-DEAS MasterFEM, and ADAMS is added to the kinematics analysis. Processing, along with Cimatron and Delcam, is one of the three best softwares at present. UG provides a rich and simple secondary development tool, which can easily add functions. His knowledge expert system KF is also the best in CAD.

Mastering UG makes it easier to enter high-paying industries such as automobiles, molds and European machinery and electronics factories.

Disadvantages: If the modeling is not skilled enough, the failure of feature update is far more than Pro/E, and the UG system is very unstable. In fact, it is very difficult to be fully involved and easy to modify. Some functions of surface are not as good as Pro/E, so it is a bit difficult to find a job.