Why did generations of efforts lose to you for ten years? What does it show?

Some time ago, I wrote an article, "Why do you say it is difficult to have children in a cold door?" In the article, I mainly discussed some viewpoints about quasi-hardening. Because of the gradual solidification of class, educational resources cannot be balanced, and the main factor that determines children's future is related to the amount of educational resources provided by poor families and giants.

Then go back to today's point of view: "Why did the efforts of several generations make your ten years' hard work go down the drain?"

This sentence is harsh and stinging, which is a great blow to ordinary people who are looking forward to squeezing into the upper class and changing their lives. After ten years of cold window, children will naturally be beaten by society when they enter society. They realized that fairness never existed. When someone says something so bold but very realistic, it's really easy to lose heart and lament the injustice of fate.

But this sentence is very problematic.

I don't know the specific background of this sentence. There may be some truth in some specific situations, but if it is not universally applicable, it cannot be called truth. Since it is not the truth, why should everyone care?

It's just some people's smug views, or the poisoned chicken soup used by training teachers to encourage students.

What's wrong with this sentence

He presupposed a scene in which our poor disciples (not even poor disciples) and rich children stood in the same examination room and competed fairly. The accumulation of several generations, the contempt of the rich children for us.

This kind of presupposition does not exist in the real society.

We can't stand on the same starting line as them at all.

It can be said that college entrance examination. Come on, do children with real backgrounds care about the college entrance examination? Others have been bilingual since primary school, and even ivy has been booked. We have a chance to squeeze this wooden bridge with him. Is that the best in the world? You go through life and death, and he just goes through the motions.

Even if these rich children are excluded, rich people will take the art test route and go abroad. It can be said that the remaining people in the college entrance examination have either excellent grades or no other way out.

The goddess who crashed in Zhangjiajie a few days ago was just a college student and flew 500 meters. Has anyone calculated her cost? Do people really care about competing with you who study hard at the cold window?

Others are goddesses when they are alive, and the ways of accidents are higher than ordinary people. While regretting, as ordinary people, we should also realize that some differences are actually created through the efforts of the previous generation.

Some friends will say, so what, was it an accident? Isn't it loess?

But she has the right to choose. We can only watch the news and sigh, regret and gloat.

Although class differences are whitewashed as much as possible, it is an indisputable social reality that class differences are getting bigger and harder.

Of course, this sentence also makes sense in some scenarios. This kind of scene is the most popular among all kinds of short videos, which is nothing more than a girl choosing between two suitors.

A family is average-looking, with a good car and a BMW, and a hard-working and handsome one. Two boys pursue beautiful girls together. Who should they choose?

When the "light of the right path" rings, you usually choose to be handsome, motivated and learn, but what about reality? Although the propaganda is to crack down on this poisonous chicken soup, people have a steelyard in their hearts.

What would you choose?

Moreover, in order to create conflicts, these fake short videos will make the age and image of rich people worse, while young and active people are handsome guys, which makes girls in a dilemma.

What is terrible is that in reality, rich people are also handsome, educated, self-motivated, dedicated and entrepreneurial. If they can't do it, they can go back and inherit the efforts of generations. Boys who study hard at a cold window, influenced by their family background, may have a poor personality and be picky. Even after reading a book, he may be the Phoenix Man.

So, if you are a girl's parents, who do you want her to choose? And parents' values are bound to infect children, so do you think beautiful girls will choose poor boys? Don't be silly. Unlimited videos. If it is negative energy, it may be limited.

Therefore, in this scenario, as long as a normal person, "the efforts of generations of others will never lose to you for ten years." When the age, appearance and personality are similar, do you choose the children of giants who can overtake in corners or the poor handsome men who want to grow up together?

Note that there is also a premise here, that is, to choose together instead of cheating (although this is mostly the case in reality, we assume that human nature is beautiful). How to choose when two people compete at the same time and have a little affection for both of them? Isn't that nonsense?

But then again, this is an assumption in extreme scenes, similar to the neglected friction in vacuum scenes.

This is also the reason why I said this sentence incorrectly at the moment.

Because in real life, except for the emotional confusion of young people who don't understand the world, there is no other situation where rich children and poor students compete fairly.

Speaking of which, it suddenly occurred to me that a few days ago, my friend talked about the problems of urban junior high schools. Many places, such as Shanghai and Changsha, have started all-round computer allocation, and no longer accept any ability tests, which makes a considerable number of students with good grades and many specialties miss their qualifications, while those who don't study are randomly admitted to prestigious schools by luck. This makes many parents in Niu Wa angry and helpless. They paid so much energy and money for their children's Excellence, but in the end they lost to luck. It's really puzzling.

This is an obvious effort of two generations and lost to those who don't study and work hard.

But in terms of the country's education level, it is to pursue greater fairness. It is precisely because some parents train their children too much and too early that many other children lose the opportunity to enter famous schools, and because of the lack of resources of famous schools, they finally have to decide life and death by drawing lots-but this is limited to junior high schools. Once you enter the senior high school entrance examination, college entrance examination, postgraduate entrance examination and go abroad, hard-working parents and parents who don't take their children's studies seriously will also be separated.

The compulsory implementation of all-computer allocation at the beginning of junior high school can be regarded as a powerful leveling of educational resources at the national level.

The "efforts of several generations" are more about the consciousness of cultural pursuit than just the provision of materials, and this awareness of learning will ultimately determine a person's future. As far as the importance of culture is concerned, not only the giants value it, but ordinary people gradually realize that "knowledge changes their destiny", but there are still a lot of materials to lay a good foundation for their study, which is also reflected in the fact that ordinary students who study hard at a cold window can't compete with the giants.

As I said before, rich children are as hard-working and handsome as they are. Even if he has no financial backing, he will not necessarily lose to you, let alone others.

Speaking seems to prove the rationality of this sentence.

In fact, I just want to explain that we usually see as few black sheep from rich families as those from poor families, and it is easy to be used as an example to advertise or target. In fact, there are many people who are eager to learn, and those who come from poor or ordinary families are a dime a dozen, just like you and me.

But I still have to say that this sentence is wrong.

Why? Because of the rapid development of today's society, it provides us ordinary people with many opportunities to overtake in corners. This is different from the struggle between the rich and the poor in the history of China. Xifeng has immigrated to America, hasn't she? Of course, this does not mean that there is anything wrong with the United States, but at least in her own world, she has achieved her goal. This is why we still have to work hard to break through, know the class differences, know the fragmentation, and know the gradual closure of the rising path, but we can't be disheartened.

Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties, Sui and Tang Dynasties, it may really take several generations and hundreds of years to become a giant. But today, it may really take only a few decades to change the fate of yourself or the next generation.

Don't mention nouveau riche. Life may change in an instant, but not ideologically.

Although economic change is fundamental, our discussion will be meaningless if we confine ourselves to material change.