Heinz's composition of stealing drugs makes sensibility bloom in reason.

The conflict between emotion and law, the game between righteousness and benefit.

-material composition "Heinz stealing medicine" writing guidance

Read the following materials and write as required. (60 points)

In a city in Italy, there was a man named Heinz. His wife died of cancer. There is a pharmacist in this city who has developed a specific medicine to treat cancer. The cost of preparing this medicine is only $200, but his asking price is extremely high, asking for $2,000 per dose. In order to buy this medicine, Heinz sold his property and borrowed money everywhere, but in the end he only got $65,438+0,000. Heinz pleaded with the pharmacist, his wife is dying. Can you sell him the medicine cheaper or allow him to take credit? The pharmacist refused him and said, "I developed this medicine just to make money." Heinz had no choice but to sneak into the pharmacist's warehouse one night and steal the medicine. As a result, the police found out and took him to the police station.

Requirements: ① Choose your own point of view, determine your own intention, and draw up your own title, regardless of style. (2) Don't leave the scope of the content and meaning of the material. ③ No less than 800 words. (4) No interplanting or plagiarism.

Thinking guidance

This topic presents a dilemma. These materials only present a dilemma and do not provide any biased views. Instead, it guides students to analyze the difficulties provided and focuses on the critical thinking ability of candidates. The headline material mainly involves three characters: Heinz, pharmacist and policeman. Although there is a wife, it is obvious that the wife is not the protagonist in the whole material and can be ignored. According to the principle that there are as many main characters as there are writing angles, we can conceive from the following three angles:

1 Heinz angle. Heinz's wife is dying. Even if she sells her property and borrows money everywhere, she can't afford enough money to buy specific drugs. She took risks, chose to steal medicine and was arrested in the police station. In Heinz's view, the main problem is the conflict between emotion and reason. Candidates can affirm Heinz's behavior or object, as long as it is reasonable and open-minded.

2, the pharmacist's point of view. The pharmacist has developed a specific medicine for treating cancer, and the asking price is very high in order to make money. In the face of Heinz, who was pleading and desperate, he flatly refused. In pharmacists, it mainly embodies the conflict between justice and benefit. Obviously, the pharmacist chose interest first. This angle seems to be open. Candidates can of course choose to support the pharmacist's behavior, because they do have the freedom to sell or not to sell and at what price. However, the view of putting interests first is obviously inappropriate in today's society, and it is better to take the view of denying pharmacists' behavior.

3. From the police's point of view. The police discovered Heinz's theft and took him to the police station. The dilemma faced by the police at this time is actually the conflict between reality and law. This angle is also open. Candidates can hold the view that law is greater than emotion, and they can also take into account human feelings when enforcing the law. As long as it makes sense, it can be done.

Heinz once read a story about choice: If you like an apple, but it is on a very high tree, you have to move a ladder to pick it, then you will be very happy when you get it.

However, if you move a ladder for this apple, but the ladder is unstable, you fall, break your arm and leg, and the apple falls into your arms, will you still be happy? My answer: no! ! I remember when I was in primary school, I joined the track and field team. I don't know why I caught a cold, but I don't care. Because I used to catch a cold, sometimes I can get better without taking medicine, so I continue to train.

I don't know, my cold got worse, I had a cough and headache, and I had a fever for several days.

I went to the hospital for examination, but there was no result. I just had an injection for a few days, thinking that I could reduce my fever, but it didn't work at all. I had to go to the hospital for examination and find out that it was pneumonia.

At first, I had no idea about the word pneumonia, except that my hand was going to be destroyed by a needle.

In this way, I had to go to the hospital for weeks until the shadows in my lungs decreased.

I have returned to my normal study life, but because I haven't done my homework for several weeks, I have developed the inertia, and some people are unwilling to do their homework.

At this juncture, I have to make a choice, whether to go forward or backward.

To tell the truth, my previous academic performance was not bad, but if I let myself be lazy, I'm afraid my performance will plummet! ! The teacher looked for me and looked at me with disappointed eyes. I can't stand it! And how can I stand the eyes of parents and others? ! I really can't stand it! I have never accepted such complicated and sharp eyes! ! I regret it! ! I regret my laziness, I regret my disappointment, I regret my depravity! ! So, on that sunny weekend, I chose one of the roads, which was wide and long, full of light and temptation.

At first glance, although there will be bumps and wild animals, it will eventually be a beautiful world, which makes people yearn for and intoxicate.

I think: the rest of the road, no matter when and where, I will not choose it, my ideal is not there.

Perhaps, many years later, I recalled this choice somewhere: on a sunny day, I chose to go forward bravely, and I will never regret it! ! The ladder was crooked, so I didn't fall to the ground. Instead, I straightened the ladder and took the apple calmly.

Some people always feel that God owes him. Parents' concern, teachers' concern and friends' true feelings seem to be taken for granted.

They regard kindness as dirt, but they are treacherous without guilt, and their gratitude has long since disappeared.

Gratitude is the basic principle of being a man, and only gratitude can continuously purify the soul; At the same time, gratitude is like a rose, which needs careful cultivation and care.

Please write an 800-word article on the topic of gratitude.

First, the famous saying 1, give me a peach in return.

-"The Book of Songs is elegant" 2. Courtesy is reciprocal, and it is indecent to go without coming; It is also impolite to come and not go.

-"Book of Rites" 3. The kindness that is dripped by people should be repaid with spring water.

-Proverbs 4. Life is a mirror. When you laugh, it will laugh. You cry, and it cries.

-Thackeray, England 5. "Gratitude" is not necessarily gratitude for great kindness. Gratitude can be a life attitude and a moral sentiment that is good at discovering and appreciating beauty.

-Wen 6. I am a spring silkworm. I will spin silk after eating mulberry leaves. Even if I cook in a pot, the silk will continue to spin. In order to add a little warmth to the world-Ba Jin Er, poem 1, and see how much love there is in an inch of grass, I won three Chunhui.

-Meng Jiao's Wandering Sons 2. Who knows that every meal is hard.

-"Farmers" 3, but as an introduction, do not hesitate to be light.

-Lu 4. My father gave birth to me, and my mother obeys me, dotes on me, nurtures me, cares for me, and goes out into my stomach.

My father gave birth to me and my mother nursed me.

Caress me, protect me, nurture me and educate me.

Take care of me, miss me, go out and miss me.

)-"The Book of Songs-Xiaoya" III. Other materials1.1.620 In 2000, some Puritans who suffered religious persecution sailed to the New World of North America on the Mayflower to seek religious freedom.

After two months of tossing and turning at sea, they finally landed in Plymouth, Massachusetts in the cold 1 1 month.

In the first winter, more than half of the immigrants died of hunger and infectious diseases.

Those who survived had a hard life. They began to sow in the first spring.

In order to survive, they pray for God's blessing and eagerly look forward to a bumper harvest all summer, because they know that a bumper harvest in autumn determines their survival.

Later, the crops finally got a bumper harvest.

Everyone is very grateful for God's grace and decides to choose a day to commemorate it forever.

This is the origin of American Thanksgiving Day, which is an out-and-out national holiday in the United States.

On this day, Americans of all faiths and backgrounds thank God for his kindness in the past year and sincerely pray that God will continue to bless them.

2. Someone said, "I hate my life and I have to make some changes.

"What these people want to change is their ungrateful heart.

If we don't know how to appreciate what I have, it's hard for us to get more. Even if we get what we want, we won't really enjoy it. Gratitude is a philosophy of life and great wisdom of life.

Life in this world can't be smooth sailing. All kinds of failures and helplessness need us to face bravely and deal with them with an open mind.

At this time, do you complain about life blindly and become depressed from now on? Or be grateful for life and get up after falling? British writer Thackeray said: "Life is a mirror. You laugh, and it laughs. " You cry, and it cries.

Gratitude is a way of singing about life, which comes from love and hope for life. There was once a Buddha who crossed the river by boat and didn't want to upset the boat.

The Buddha floated in the river like a leaf for a long time before he climbed ashore exhausted.

The first thing we did when we got to the shore was not to scold the boatman for his incompetence and make him lose everything he carried with him, nor to curse the dangerous waves that almost killed him, but to kneel on the beach and worship Master from a distance: "Thank you, Master!" Someone asked inexplicably, "Why not thank the Bodhisattva?" Buddha said, "I didn't like swimming. That's what Master taught me every time he forced me into the water.

Not the master, my life is fake today! "When you are in trouble, you don't blame anyone, but you are grateful. Life has reached such a transcendental state, and you are suddenly enlightened. What else in this world can make you suffer and resent? Idiom story: Mr. Dong Guo and the Wolf; Farmers and snakes; Bite the ring and knot the grass; You see a dog's cold, put warm cotton wool on it. It will look at you for a long time when it lies in cotton wool. It can't speak, so it can only express gratitude in this way.

You see a bird hurt, take it out of the cat's mouth, treat its wound with medicine, give it food, and then put it back into the forest.

It flies to the treetops and will come back to see you.

It can't talk, so it can only remember your help in this way.

Animals with low intelligence still appreciate the help of others. Shouldn't human beings also have a grateful heart? Dogs and birds will stare at you for a long time to thank you, but this moment will soon pass; They may forget you soon.

But with this moment, the world is no longer the original world, grateful eyes disappeared, but gratitude scattered in the world, the world is warm and kind.

So we should cultivate this kind of feeling between people. On one occasion, Kanmi, a Japanese geisha master, played an ancient hiker in a play. Just as he was about to fight, a pupil reminded him, "Master, your sandals are loose.

"He answered" thank you "and immediately squatted down to tie his shoelaces.

When he reached the stage entrance where the protected person could not see, he squatted down again and loosened the shoelaces he had just tied.

Obviously, he wants to show the fatigue of a long-distance traveler with loose sandals.

A reporter went backstage to interview and saw this scene with his own eyes. He asked Kami, "Why don't you teach that student on the spot? He still doesn't understand the true meaning of acting.

Kanmi replied, "There are many opportunities to teach students acting skills.

On this occasion today, the most important thing is to teach him to learn to appreciate the concern of others.

6. An Italian female explorer crossed the Taklimakan Desert alone.

When she walked out of the desert, she knelt down facing the desert and was silent for a long time.

A reporter asked why, and he said sincerely, "I don't think I have conquered." ...

How to introduce Heinz's moral dilemma of stealing drugs to primary school students (grade three or four)? Heinz's beautiful and kind wife is unfortunately terminally ill.

Only a medicine recently invented by the pharmacist in this town can save her, but the price of this medicine is 10 times the cost.

This is an astronomical figure for Heinz.

Heinz went to the pharmacist himself and begged, "Have a heart and sell it to me at the cost price, will you?" My wife is hopeless. The pharmacist stared, "What did you say?" Sell it to you at the original price? Then why do I still do medicine? "Heinz continued to beg him and said," Either I give you all the money I have, give me the medicine first, and I will pay the rest later. Are you all right? "The pharmacist flatly refused.

Heinz had to steal medicine in the middle of the night.

At this time, the teacher asked, "Students, do you think Inz should steal medicine?" ? Is it wrong to steal one person's medicine to save another's life? Should it be punished? "Remember to adopt it. ...

Should Heinz steal drugs? Why should I? Why not? Spread it all out. Don't! Italy is a European country, and the west values the rule of law over human feelings! Although saving people is very important to Heinz, if we ignore the existence of laws and regulations because of saving people, the consequences will be unimaginable! Think about it. Maybe one day Zhang San will steal things because his cat and dog are sick, and Zhang San values cats and dogs more than his own life! Because everyone has something he thinks is important to him, including his beloved, will we acquiesce in his behavior without scolding him? Life is important, but we should protect and maintain the existence of life in a legal way! ...

Morality and law: the moral problem of stealing drugs Heinz's beautiful and kind wife was unfortunately terminally ill.

Only one recently invented by the pharmacist in this town can save her, but it should cost 10 times.

This is an astronomical figure for Heinz.

Heinz went to the pharmacist himself and begged, "Have a heart and sell it to me at the cost price, will you?" My wife is hopeless. "The pharmacist's eyes widened." what did you say ? Sell it to you at the original price? Then what else can I do? "Heinz continue to beg him," either I give you all the money in hand, please give it to me first, and I'll pay the rest later. Are you all right? " The chemist flatly refused.

Heinz had to steal that in the middle of the night.

At this time, the teacher asked, "Students, do you think Inz should steal it?" ? Is it wrong to steal from one person to save another's life? Should it be punished? "I remember.

Whether Heinz should steal medicine to save his wife from suicide is a moral dilemma.

If a person has a great responsibility to others, he should stick to it.

However, the struggle with the disease is too painful.

There are two brothers in a small town. They are embarrassed and want to leave secretly, but they have no money.

So my brother stole 1000 dollars from a store.

My brother borrowed money from an old man.

The old man is famous for his kindness. His brother lied that he was seriously ill and needed money for surgery. He hoped that the old man would lend him 1 0,000 yuan and pay it back when he recovered.

In fact, my brother is not ill and will not return the money to the elderly.

Although the old man didn't know his brother, he gave him money.

Finally, the two brothers left the town.

1, who is worse, my brother stealing money or my brother cheating? Why? 2. Do you think cheating the old is the worst thing? Why? Generally speaking, why should people keep their promises? 4. Is it important to keep your promise to people you don't know well or who you may never see again? Why yes or no? Why shouldn't you steal from the store? 6. What is the importance of property rights? 7. Should people obey the law? Why should or why not? 8. Is it irresponsible for the old man to lend money to his brother? Why yes or no?

Criticize others in the name of morality. Heinz stole medicine to treat his seriously ill wife. His unswerving love for his wife is touching, and then his behavior is not allowed by law. In my opinion, illegal acts in the name of "morality" are unjust! There is a news report that an old man sat directly on a young man's lap because a young man refused to give him his seat.

While laughing at the behavior of the elderly, should we think about how to balance the relationship between morality and law in the face of this dilemma? Morality proves that conscience is alive and humanity is still there. Is it illegal? Or do you turn your back on morality in order to abide by the law and show that your actions are legal? In today's society where morality and law are constantly in conflict, this headache is also worth thinking about! As far as the behavior of the elderly is concerned, from the legal point of view, it is not only unreasonable, but also damages the right of other passengers to sit in their seats. It seems that the traditional virtue of "giving up your seat" is used to test people's morality, but it is not appropriate to kidnap the interests of passengers and harm the interests of other passengers.

In the face of this dilemma, in fact, it is best for both sides to take a step back and communicate with their hearts. If everyone is unreasonable and causes contradictions, it will be very harmful.

In real life, some poor children who are manipulated to beg sit on the street with helpless eyes.

This cold phenomenon is like a mirror, reflecting a dark corner of this society-there are criminals who profit from people's sympathy under the banner of "morality".

This illegal act in the guise of "morality" not only damages the personal rights of these poor children, destroys their future, but also deceives well-meaning passers-by.

These lawless elements were blinded by greed, betrayed their children's personal rights and trampled on people's conscience and morality in vain.

These people make society sad and destroy social harmony.

This kind of illegal behavior under the banner of morality is very harmful to society.

Therefore, in any case, don't take "morality" as an excuse and regard conscience as nothing.

In a society ruled by law, real morality must be realized at the political and institutional levels, and the existence of moral special zones is not allowed in essence.

The "moral building" based on the legal system is more convincing to stabilize the society and ensure social harmony.

Only by taking morality as the highest banner and relying on the identity characteristics of a vulnerable group, should we be sympathized and protected by "morality", treat the law as a paper wall, disobey the law, take risks and commit illegal acts, how can we talk about "morality"? In essence, it has lost morality and endangered society.

Morality should not have this special status.

When we are constantly stung by the time of "moral decline", we should not only reflect on our moral behavior, consider whether it is reasonable, but also clarify the bottom line of morality and law. No moral behavior can touch the bottom line of law, which is the minimum guarantee of morality.

No matter how serious the illegal act is on the moral level, it is far from the real "moral light"

A legitimate social citizen should stick to his own principles, not set up a special zone for morality, and abide by the law!

Should Hindes steal drugs from junior high school politics? Why is his wife sick and his family poor? First, Heinz didn't steal medicine, which caused his wife's painful death and the pain of relatives and friends, so it was vicious not to steal.

Second, Heinz stole medicine, which caused the pain of pharmacists, so stealing medicine was vicious.

Small summary: if you don't steal medicine, life is painful; Stealing medicine makes life less painful; Therefore, Heinz should steal medicine.

Stealing drugs is good and bad.

Don't steal evil, big good and small evil.

First, Heinz should not be morally condemned for stealing drugs.

If morality denies Heinz, morality will be wrong.

Morally, it should be admitted that Heinz was right to steal drugs.

Second, Heinz's stealing drugs is wrong in law.

In order not to destroy the legal system and cause social harm, the law must deny Heinz.

Otherwise, there will be mistakes in the law.

Summary: Heinz should steal drugs, but after stealing drugs, he should surrender and accept the punishment of the law.

People who have been stolen and "sprayed" remind them where the basic morality has gone. Recently, a wonderful post caused a heated discussion on the Internet.

The post was sent by a woman in Meishan, Sichuan. She was visited by thieves in the shopping mall on June 5438+00 and June 5438+05. A man at the scene told her that when she entered the gate of the mall, the bag was opened by a thief.

The woman went home after chasing the thief in vain, and put the matter on the Internet, accusing the person who reminded her: "I really want to tell the person who told me, are you a man, and thieves can't be provoked?" Why didn't you tell me when you saw it? Is there such a person? "As soon as this post came out, it attracted many netizens to bombard her, thinking that she didn't condemn the thief but blamed the dog for biting Lv Dongbin's reminder.

Even though the man's answer was far away at that time and worried that the thief had several accomplices, she didn't get the lady's understanding. She insisted on refusing to express her gratitude to the person who reminded her.

This post became news and attracted the attention of many media because it was controversial.

From the poster's point of view, seeing the thief stealing money without reminding him, and telling him after the thief left, really didn't play any role, but made the parties feel schadenfreude.

This may be an important reason why the woman did not condemn the thief but condemned the reminder.

From the point of view of reminding, it is understandable to choose a relatively safe way to remind the stolen people when the number of thieves is dominant and may endanger the family.

This discounted goodwill is obviously much better than the malice of thieves and other spectators who may see it but choose indifference-at least, people feel the man's yearning for goodwill.

The ancients said that goodwill should "look at the heart rather than the trace", which means that a person has goodwill, even if he does not achieve the best effect in the end, at least his starting point and motivation should be affirmed.

This may be the reason why the "people who eat melons" blame the stolen lady on the ground-people have no obligation to remind you, but they are not thanked. Instead, they are scolded. It is really putting the cart before the horse, regardless of right or wrong.

Looking further, the onlookers are not only dissatisfied with the poster's right and wrong attitude, but also disgusted with the poster's moral kidnapping remarks.

Judging from the weight of scolding, criticism and scolding caused by "not knowing the good heart" only account for about 30%, while those who accuse the other party of naturally helping themselves should account for about 70%.

This shows that more and more people don't agree with the practice of telling others what to do only from their own standpoint. It is becoming more and more clear that people can't accept unilaterally making each other bear high moral standards regardless of their own situation.

The sign of maturity is that people can understand the "necessity" of others and only consider problems from their own perspective, which is very inappropriate in the current social context.

From the perspective of maintaining good social customs, we can optimize the practices of several parties.

For example, at the reminder end, can the theft be interrupted in advance in a relatively safe and hidden way when the theft is implemented? After all, there are more thieves than people in broad daylight.

As for the person who was stolen, you can express your experience more calmly and objectively in a non-emotional way, instead of being aggressive and insulting.

So you won't lose everything and be pitied.

There is no need for netizens who post posts to express their views in the form of "scolding", which makes the stolen people worse.

Everyone should be an enemy, this is a thief, but in the melee, the thief was magically forgotten.

Please indicate the source for reprinting. Heinz's composition of stealing drugs makes sensibility bloom in reason.