What happened when Trump's "new travel ban" was rejected by the Court of Appeal?

According to British media reports on June 13, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit maintained the suspension of the revised "travel ban" issued by US President Trump for people in six major Muslim countries.

In ruling on Hawaii's previous resolution, the Court of Appeal found that the executive order violated the existing immigration laws and regulations. This legal ruling once again frustrated Trump's promise to his supporters to pass the ban and his efforts.

Us attorney general Jeff? Sessions objected to the ruling. He said: "President Trump's executive order belongs to his legal authority and aims to safeguard national security." He added: "A series of recent attacks have confirmed that the national security of the United States is directly threatened by this issue.

It is reported that this dispute may eventually be decided by the US Supreme Court. The judge's ruling quoted Trump's tweet on June 5. The early "travel ban" promulgated a few days after Trump entered the White House caused chaos and public protests at the airport.

Trump's revised "travel ban" stipulates that citizens of six countries including Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen are prohibited from entering the country within 90 days. /kloc-all refugees are prohibited from entering the country within 0/20 days, but the instruction deletes the content related to religious minorities.

In the ruling of 12 local time, the judge said, "immigration, even for the president of the United States, is not a one-man show." They said that Trump failed to explain that the six countries mentioned in the ban and the entry of refugees into the United States would harm national interests.

It is reported that this dispute may eventually be decided by the US Supreme Court. What is the specific result, let us wait and see!