Why is Zionism the source of modern terrorism?

terrorism is condemned all over the world, and one of the important reasons is that it hurts innocent people in cold blood and treats civilians indiscriminately by cruel means. Since terrorism has been raging all over the world, people have to discuss a question: where does the source of terrorism come from? This question is somewhat sensitive. After the tragedy of Charlie Hebdo in France, politicians and media in most countries only mentioned terrorism, while a few countries and leaders bluntly pointed to Islam. Whether enough paper is stabbed or not, everyone actually understands it. In fact, many western scholars, politicians and media commentators have pointed out that terrorism is closely related to Islamic fundamentalism, which is considered as a hotbed of terrorism as early as when bin Laden became a global attention figure. This statement is very deceptive.

After the "Charlie Massacre", some media pointed out that Jews were one of the important targets of this serious terrorist attack in France. It is reported that the four hostages who died were all Jews. However, on the one hand, an Israeli newspaper condemned Islamic terrorism, on the other hand, it published an article recalling the time when Judaism and Islam were at peace in history. Fundamentalism can be seen from its name that it advocates reviving the old tradition. In this case, why doesn't Islamic fundamentalism revive the tradition of peaceful coexistence with Judaism? In fact, Mohammed, the founder of Islam, had a good relationship with Jews at the beginning of his religion. Around Medina, the Islamic holy land, many Jews lived at that time. So why doesn't Islamic fundamentalism follow Mohammed's code of conduct? It is questionable that terrorism originated from Islamic fundamentalism.

First of all, fundamentalism first appeared in Protestant Christianity in the United States, about between the two world wars, and one of the purposes at that time was to oppose Darwin. The fundamentalism of Protestantism still has a great influence in American society. Christian fundamentalism originated in the United States opposes modernism, liberalism and secularism in theory. This religious sentiment soon influenced other religions that were impacted by western modernization, such as Judaism and Islam. Jewish fundamentalism and Islamic fundamentalism also came into being. Therefore, the source of Islamic fundamentalism actually comes from western society. Tracing back to the source, if Islamic terrorism is closely related to Islamic fundamentalism, then the conclusion can only be that terrorism originates from the interior of western civilization.

secondly, Islamic terrorism began to appear in the 197s. But the real source of terrorism is earlier than it. In the 19th century, Zionists began to immigrate to Palestine. At the beginning of the 2th century, the Palestinian area originally belonging to the Ottoman Empire was entrusted by Britain, which carried out the policy of "pro-Arab and anti-Jewish" from support to indifference to Zionism. Since then, Jewish terrorism has started to be rampant. In 1937, the first full-time Jewish terrorist organization "Ilgon" was established, and within two years, * * * caused more than 3, Arabs and more than 1 Britons to die. In 1944, Jewish terrorists assassinated the British envoy to the Middle East, and they even planned to assassinate Churchill. In July 1946, "Ilgon" exploded at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, the headquarters of the British trusteeship, killing 91 people. In 1948, "Ilgon" created the "Dayr Yasin Village Massacre". Bei Jing, the leader of "Ilgon", which is now called Likud Group, later became the Israeli Prime Minister. Therefore, from the source of terrorism, Muslims were the first victims of Jewish terrorism.

Third, the Irish Peace Corps has long been regarded as terrorism. They believe in Catholicism and have nothing to do with Islam. Basque separatism at the border between Spain and France has also caused many terrorist attacks, and they have nothing to do with Islam. Italy's "Red Brigades" are also the makers of terrorist activities, and they have nothing to do with Islam. Therefore, terrorism is in fact the product of western civilization itself. The Islamic terrorism mentioned now is just a terrorist virus bred in western society and transmitted to Islam, and Islam does not necessarily lead to terrorism.

fourth, the so-called Islamic terrorism, such as ISIS, which has attracted much attention recently, has more similarities with the original fascism in Europe. When ISIS first appeared, some people collected the Chinese translation name of this organization on the Internet. I think it can be called "assis" to point out the relationship with fascism, but the mainstream media all over the world will not accept this name that shames western civilization. The long name "Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant" strengthens Islamic characteristics, but fails to hide the fact that most of the core members of ISIS are from Europe. Not long ago, ISIS spread a "decapitation" video, and the murderer was recognized by the British police because of his standard London accent. There are many ISIS members. The vague intelligence of western countries says that thousands of people have returned to Europe from ISIS, including distant Australia, so they have upgraded the level of terrorist attacks. These people come from the west, and many of them were born in the west and returned to the west. Their only common feature is that they believe in Islam, but does this mean that their religious beliefs are necessarily related to terrorism? It is not a recent event for Muslims to enter the western society. Why did Muslims who entered the western society not become terrorists before, but now many native Muslims in the West have become terrorists? Yan Zi said: oranges born in the south are oranges, and oranges born in the north are oranges. The leaves and disciples are similar, but in fact, the taste is different and the soil and water are different. This passage is too correct for the so-called Islamic terrorism. However, the western "water and soil" is the root cause of the variation, and terrorism is the product of western civilization itself.

So, why is it deceptive to say that "Islamic fundamentalism leads to terrorism"? Because it blurs the fact that fundamentalism originated in the United States, it also covers up the fact that terrorism continues in western society, and labels terrorism as Islam by replacing flowers with trees. This is not the first time that the United States has done this. During Hoover's tenure as director of the FBI, the American underworld was rampant. Hoover, who served as the director of a democratic country for 48 years, initially refused to admit that there was a triad society in the United States, and later had to admit it, but Hoover gave it a name, "Mafia". The purpose is to prove that the underworld in the United States is foreign, transplanted from Sicily, Italy, and not produced within the "great, glorious and correct" United States. If the underworld is produced within the United States, how can it reflect the advanced American system? Therefore, the underworld must be foreign, and the naming of "Mafia" is the key.

from this, we can understand the conclusion that "Islamic fundamentalism leads to terrorism", and the purpose is also to show that terrorism is not endogenous to western civilization, but foreign, and it is a despicable means made by the enemies of western civilization. Western civilization is so advanced, how can it produce terrorism from within? However, terrorism is indeed a product of western civilization. If western civilization does not reflect on itself, deepen reform and solve its own institutional problems, it will be difficult for them to eliminate the threat of terrorism.