How much is the salary difference between teachers and civil servants?

According to the "Yangtze Evening News" on July 29, at yesterday's provincial rural tax and fee reform work conference, Jiangsu Province announced the "Opinions on Further Deepening the Reform of the Rural Compulsory Education Management System (Discussion Draft) )", requiring rural teachers' wages to be no lower than the level of local civil servants, and gradually increasing with local economic development. Rural primary and secondary school teachers should be included in the local urban employee basic medical insurance coverage as soon as possible, and full employment should be implemented to promote the sustainability and health of rural compulsory education. develop.

· Earn a lifetime salary in one year

· 2008 Sportswear Distribution Revealed

· A good project to make huge profits in the Year of the Golden Pig

· Do good business that others have not thought of

· Be wary of eczema, urticaria, skin ringworm

· New breakthroughs in diabetes and high blood pressure

"China Youth Daily" July Since the news was reported on the 14th that rural teachers in Cangshan County have become poor due to teaching and that teachers are no longer as good as selling cabbage, it has aroused strong reactions in the whole society. The living conditions of teachers, especially rural primary and secondary school teachers and private teachers in cities, are shocking. focus on. Because the investment in education continues to decrease, resulting in a large number of brain drains, the teaching profession is not as stable as outsiders say, and it also leads to a decline in the quality of education.

Why are local governments reluctant to make teachers and civil servants pay equal to each other, and do not pay attention to investment in education? An important reason is that the saying "one official term brings benefit to one party" is at work. An official term lasts only a short time, and increasing teachers' salaries cannot produce economic benefits in the short term and cannot add political achievements to leading cadres. So, who wants to only invest and not pay attention to output? In fact, this is a misunderstanding of "benefiting one party". In fact, benefiting one party should benefit future generations.

As for investment in education, the practices of some developed countries in attracting talents are worth learning from. Between 1971 and 1997, about 19 million people immigrated to the United States. Currently, the United States is considering raising the immigration limit for foreign professionals from 115,000 to 200,000 per year; Germany also wants to attract 20,000 foreign talents from outside the EU; the United Kingdom Laws are being changed to make it easier for British companies to attract tech talent from Asia. Japan and South Korea have made similar moves. China has the largest human resources, but the number of people with university education only accounts for 6% of the country's total population. There are only about 500,000 scientists engaged in development and research, while the United States and Japan have 1 million and 800,000 respectively. In recent years, more than 300,000 international students in our country have been attracted to developed countries. Peking University and Tsinghua University have simply become talent training bases for the United States. 80% and 76% of them have gone to the United States respectively. We have spent great efforts and high costs to In a short period of time, the highly sophisticated talents cultivated were easily attracted by the high salaries and good working environment in foreign countries. Our country's GDP is increasing, but teachers' salary levels have always failed to keep up with the level of national economic development. In terms of salary, level and other benefits, all are given priority by position, and professional titles are put aside. When the "Teachers Law" encounters official status, they have to step aside and keep their mouths shut.

"Respect knowledge, respect talents?" Promotion means everything! As for the deduction, arrears and misappropriation of teachers' salaries in some places, it happens from time to time. The current treatment of teachers is the result of the country's continuous emphasis on education over the past few years. They will starve to death, but they will never become rich, not to mention that only a few people own buildings and cars. I have not heard of any teacher having an independent villa. When former U.S. President Clinton was serving as governor of Arkansas for the second time, he believed that the reason why Arkansas was economically backward was also because of its cultural backwardness. It is precisely because of the backward education level that it affects the development of social economy. Therefore, he strongly advocated increasing education funding, raising teachers' salaries, and vigorously developing education. He said: "From a long-term perspective, education is the key to revitalizing our economy and a permanent requirement for our economic development. We must contribute more of our limited resources to our teachers and strengthen basic education. Without strong education , our people will never be able to achieve greater achievements." The folk proverb also says: There is no stability without agriculture, no wealth without industry, and no life without business. Someone asked: What if there are no scholars? The old man Bing Xin pointed out sharply: Without scholars, one will perish. It can be seen that the rise and fall of a country is actually the rise and fall of education, and the basic element of education is teachers. If teachers are rich, education will flourish. In this regard, looking at ancient and modern times, at home and abroad, there is no exception.

[Comment] Is "Christmas Day" a violation of Confucius? Comment

[Military] The US media falsely accused my country of using high-energy lasers to blind its satellites

[Legal] The suspect who killed 13 people in Tonghua, Jilin, had an unknown motive

[ Anecdote] The flower snake stole the eggs and angered the white cat, causing a cat-snake melee

[History] Mark Twain helped overseas Chinese claim to be members of the Boxer Rebellion

[Society] A transgender beauty commissioned the media to issue a marriage announcement

[Insider] The mystery of the death of Japan’s suicide kamikaze team in World War II

[Character] Qiu Xiaohua: Let people stand up from the numbers

[Magazine] Global: Sexual Content and the Confusion of Chinese Film Classification

[Magazine] Fame: Look at those real American daughters

Celebrities take nude photos and post exquisite beauties on T-shirts

Although teachers’ salaries have increased in recent years, they are still far behind the salaries and benefits of civil servants, and they do not enjoy the benefits of civil servants. Although the Education Law stipulates that teachers’ salaries should be higher than , at least the treatment cannot be lower than that of local civil servants, but the actual situation and the law are far from the same thing. The "Education Law" has become a piece of cake that is of no use, and has not been implemented seriously. Those who default on education funds and those who formulate teacher salary policies (meaning that teachers' salaries cannot be higher than those of civil servants) are not held accountable for their illegal actions. How can such a law be so majestic that it must be strictly enforced? In the process of implementing the Education Law, it is a common phenomenon that laws are not followed, law enforcement is lax, and violations of the law are not punished. Three feet of ice does not freeze in a day. We need to work hard and make great efforts to maintain the dignity of the law, increase the intensity of law enforcement, strictly pursue the responsibilities of lawbreakers, ensure the implementation of education laws, and ensure that the wages of warm teachers are real. Not lower than the salary of local civil servants.

(Source: Red Net) (Author: Zhu Zhongbao)