Job Recruitment Website - Ranking of immigration countries - Has the imperial edict of Kangxi really been changed?

Has the imperial edict of Kangxi really been changed?

If there is a legacy, it must be the fourth son of the emperor and later Yongzheng. It is impossible to change a person's legacy.

Unofficial history said that Yongzheng made changes on 14th, changing "ten" into "Yu", which is extremely wrong.

Because: 1, the heritage is written in both Manchu and Chinese, and Manchu cannot be changed.

The word "Yu" didn't exist at that time. At that time, "Yu" should be the traditional Chinese character "Yu" now.

If there is no legacy: I personally think it is also Yongzheng. Old four and fourteen have equal opportunities in Kangxi's mind, but neither of them meets their own requirements. On the contrary, Li Hong (Emperor Qianlong), the four sons of Yongzheng, attached great importance to it, so it is likely to pass it on to his four sons.

Yongzheng was a good emperor, which consolidated Kangxi's achievements and laid a good foundation for the prosperity of Qianlong.

His position in history is also very high. He ruled for only a short time and became king at the age of forty-five. Compared with Kangxi 6 1 and Qianlong 60 years, he lost in time.