The Issue of Japanese Overseas Chinese Leaving China after Returning to China

Due to their long-term living in China and separation from Japanese society, the long-term influence of China on their thoughts and values, and their inability to master Japanese and get used to Japanese life, many overseas Chinese in Japan lost their ability to work after returning home. At the same time, because of discrimination and economic burden, it is not accepted by Japanese families, which also causes the gap between Japanese overseas Chinese and Japanese families. Japanese families refused to help overseas Chinese who had left China, which made their livelihood very difficult. They can only receive government benefits every month. At present, many overseas Chinese who have left China still live at the bottom of Japanese society, and it is difficult for them to adapt to the normal life of Japanese society. These orphans and descendants committed crimes together with the local Chinese underworld. The children they brought back, because of the different cultures between China and Japan, are also difficult to adapt to the study in Japanese schools. Therefore, many overseas Chinese living in China accused the Japanese government of not providing enough assistance, and demanded an apology and compensation for the fact that the imperial Japanese government encouraged the Japanese to emigrate to the Northeast during World War II and made a national policy immigration plan.

On June 5438+February 1 day, 2006, the Kobe District Court made a judgment on the case that 65 Japanese war orphans who stayed in China demanded compensation from the Japanese government, and ruled that 6 1 person won the case. On the grounds that the government illegally restricted orphans from returning to China and failed to fulfill their obligation to help them live independently after returning to China, it was ruled that the government must pay 6.6 million to 23 million yen to each plaintiff. The other four plaintiffs lost their claims for compensation because they exceeded the litigation period of 20 years, so their claims for compensation were rejected by the court.