French legislation protects the rural "sensory heritage". What do you protect?

The French Parliament passed a film on June 65438+1October 2 1? Protect and define the French rural sensory heritage? According to the law, the crowing of chickens, the singing of birds, the bells from churches, the smell of cow dung, the chirping of cows, the chirping of grasshoppers and cicadas in the grass, the noise made by tractors in rural France and the noise made by agricultural machinery working in the fields should all be regarded as the natural and cultural heritage of rural France and incorporated into environmental laws and regulations, so that local courts can have laws to follow when dealing with similar related disputes.

The troubles of new immigrants in rural France We know that the environment in cities and rural areas is completely different. Although there are many people and tall buildings in the city, it is relatively clean and tidy on the whole. Although the countryside is vast and has a lot of vegetation, it is inevitable that some uncomfortable things will occur due to production and life. For example, cow dung and dog dung can be seen everywhere in rural areas, and domestic garbage in some places has not been disposed of in time, which makes many city people feel uncomfortable. The same is true of France. Many French city residents yearn for the sunshine and fresh air in the countryside and emigrate to live in the countryside. However, in the following life, these city people were very uncomfortable with the cock, bird and insect singing in the countryside, and regarded the cow dung in the countryside as dirty things, thinking that these interfered with their lives, and some even brought a lawsuit to the court.

Morris Rooster Case 20 19 July, a retired couple came to the countryside for a holiday and took a big rooster from their rural neighbor Fesso's house. Morris? I went to the local court and felt that the rooster crowed so loudly every morning that they could not rest in peace. But Fesso, the owner of the rooster, doesn't think so. She said that rooster crowing is a natural fate and a normal part of rural life. Roosters should also have the right to crow, and people living in rural areas should be tolerant. The case was widely concerned by the French people at that time, and more than100000 people signed on the Internet to express their support for rooster? Morris? .

Finally, the local court ruled that the retired couple lost the case, passed legislation to protect the rural sensory heritage, and compensated for the total litigation costs and reputation damages claimed *** 1000 euros. The appearance and influence of Morris Rooster case also prompted the French Parliament to speed up the legislative process of protecting rural heritage, requiring local governments to clearly define the local rural natural heritage. Many French officials and people praised this as a victory for French rural communities. With the support of legal provisions, the French countryside can maintain the real rural appearance, and similar civil disputes can be solved faster.