State-organized immigrants

The expropriation of collectively owned land for national construction belongs to the state!

"Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Implementation of the Land Management Law" Article 2 The following land belongs to the whole people, that is, the state:

(1) Urban land;

(2) Land that has been expropriated, requisitioned or acquired as state-owned in rural areas and urban suburbs according to law;

(3) Land requisitioned by the state according to law;

(4) Woodlands, grasslands, wasteland, beaches and other lands that are not owned by collectives according to law;

(five) all the members of the rural collective economic organizations are turned into urban residents, and the land originally owned by its members collectively;

(six) due to national migration, natural disasters and other reasons, after the collective migration of land organized by farmers, the land that originally belonged to the demolished farmers is no longer used.

Characteristics of collectively owned land:

1. The subjects of rights are all agricultural labor collectives. The remarkable feature of collective land ownership is that there is no unified subject of ownership rights in the whole country, and only farmers' collectives can become the subject of collective land ownership. The right subject of collective land ownership includes three categories:

First, the peasant collectives of the village agricultural collective economic organizations;

The second is the village farmers' collective;

The third is the rural (town) farmers' collective.

2. The confirmation of collective land ownership must be registered. The Land Management Law stipulates that collectively owned land shall be registered by the people's government at the county level, and certificates shall be issued to confirm the ownership.

3. Collective land ownership cannot be punished. But it can be forcibly destroyed by the state. China's collective land ownership, like the national land ownership, cannot be freely disposed of by the owners. However, unlike the state land ownership, the state land ownership is permanent, while the collective land ownership may be destroyed by the state's coercive means.

4, collective land ownership can also be separated from the right to use the land, according to the law to determine the collective economic organizations and individuals within the collective use.