Do village cadres have the right to reclaim the contracted land of the deceased for redistribution? Why?

In many places, the contracted land has never changed since 1982 was contracted to households.

To be honest, in the first few years, many people were unfair. The main reasons are as follows: 1. The population has changed greatly. Some families used to contract land for 9 people, but now they only have 1 person. Some families run away directly, or become non-agricultural households, or get married, or die. However, some families originally only had contracted land for two people. After the son gets married, 10 people only have 2 mu of land, so they can't give it to their son.

2. The labor distribution is seriously uneven. In some places, contracted land is distributed according to household registration and labor force. After 20 years, due to the changes of age structure, disease, disability, number of children and number of births, serious changes have taken place. Families with the ability to work have no contracted land, while families without the ability to work have many contracted land.

3. The amount of cultivated land caused by natural disasters has changed. Due to floods, mudslides, landslides and water damage to cultivated land, the amount of cultivated land reduced by different families has changed.

4. Changes in cultivated land quality caused by natural disasters. Because of heavy rain, continuous rain and landslides, the soil layer of some cultivated land has decreased and the cultivated land grade has changed.

5. The new road of the village group occupies an uneven place. This kind of thing will still cause all kinds of contradictions and disputes, and some people even cling to it, because there is no land adjustment policy, which leads many people to find village cadres many times.

In addition to the above objective reasons, human factors have also caused changes in cultivated land: 1. Families with many children have built new houses, toilets and pigsty. For their children, there is almost no arable land in the end, and some families' original homesteads have not changed. This contradiction is justified, and it will explode as soon as it is discussed and cannot be reconciled.

2. Immigrant communities, highways, railways, factories, squares, etc. Occupy cultivated land. Although they give some compensation to the head of the contracted land, there is no arable land to plant directly, and some families envy others to get cash, and of course they are unwilling to redistribute the land.

3. Some people have moved out of the village and have new homestead or commercial housing in other places. However, according to the current land contract policy, it has lasted for 30 years. In this new contracting company, others are not qualified to use the land they contracted, and these people still receive farmland subsidies every year. Others have no cultivated land, and their cultivated land is either barren or subcontracted to others for cultivation.

According to the current policy, the contracted land can be transferred, inherited and mortgaged. So some families actually have no one, but close relatives naturally inherit their cultivated land, and others can't stop them.

Therefore, under the current circumstances, village cadres have no way to recover the contracted land of the deceased and redistribute it. Anyone who dares to use it may make mistakes and cause unnecessary civil disputes and economic disputes.

The actual situation varies greatly across the country, but the policy of contracting land is unified. Unless the national policy changes, the contracted land will not be used. Unless the whole village moves, all the homestead and cultivated land will be handed over to the collective, and then the village collective economic organizations will operate or transfer some rights and interests, such as breeding rights, cultivated land subsidies, growers' subsidies, etc. , and obtain shares in the form of dividends. Everyone may get the same benefits. Of course, this needs to reach a consensus and form a resolution within the economic organization, otherwise unnecessary disputes will also arise.