Huangyan immigrants

Did you find out? Just say no, say it, there must be historical records to testify, right? The Philippines can't produce convincing evidence. According to Victor Aches, "The Ancient Map produced by the Philippine Foreign Ministry as territorial evidence was drawn in 1820, which is 54 1 year later than the map of China".

[Philippine "Manila Today Standard" April 28 article] Title: It belongs to China (by Philippine investor Victor Aches)

Scarborough Reef (namely Huangyan Island) really belongs to China, which was discovered by China in 1279 Yuan Dynasty and marked on the map. Since then, fishermen from Chinese mainland and Taiwan Province Province have come here. In fact, Guo Shoujing, an astronomer, engineer and mathematician who worked under Kublai Khan, the ruler of the Yuan Dynasty, surveyed the South China Sea. The survey point was scarborough Reef, a part of zhongsha islands.

In contrast, the "Ancient Map" produced by China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs as territorial evidence was drawn in 1820, which is 54 1 year later than the map of China. Senator Edgardo angara claimed that this map, which appeared more than 540 years late, was more convincing than the much older map of China, which surprised me.

But what surprised me even more was that the article published by Father Joaquin Behnas in another newspaper on April 22nd, as one of the main framers of the Philippine Constitution (1987), he even took the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea adopted by 1982 as the basis for his defense of Philippine sovereignty. Although he did admit the fact that "scarborough Reef is not within the definition of the Paris Treaty", he did it anyway. What kind of bluff is this?

1946, when the Philippines declared its independence from the American colony, what should our territory be? Why are Nansha Islands and scarborough Reef not included in the constitutions of China 1899, 1935, 1943, 1973, 1986 and 1987? Where and from whom did we suddenly get these islands? Did this come out of thin air?

In the late 1970s, China conducted scientific investigation activities in scarborough Reef and its surrounding areas, and later erected a monument there. However, the Philippines removed this landmark at 1997 without authorization.

Until the 1990s, all official maps released by the Philippines did not include the Prattley Islands (Nansha Islands-this newspaper note) and scarborough Reef within the territory of the Philippines. 196 1 year, China's own parliament approved the People's Republic of China (PRC) Decree No.3046, which prohibited China from owning the above islands.

However, after a long period of 48 years, on March 10, 2009, we amended the law and unilaterally declared the possession of these disputed islands.

However, there is one fact that cannot be ignored. Three international treaties support China's sovereignty over these islands. They are the Spanish-American Treaty of Paris 1898, the Spanish-American Treaty of Washington 1900 and the Anglo-American Treaty 1930. It is stipulated that the territorial boundary of the Philippines is at the east longitude 1 18 degree line.

On the other hand, the Philippines claims sovereignty over these islands only on the basis of 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. As far as I know, this is just a "convention", which cannot overturn or replace the treaties or agreements signed between colonists. Even if it is really regarded as "law", it cannot take effect retroactively, thus changing the previous facts.

Who are we kidding?

"I'm just telling plain facts."

-Victor Archies, author of It (Huangyan Island) belongs to China.

"I am called a traitor, a coward and a traitor by them ... I am not afraid of the government. My position is supported by facts. I'm just saying simple facts, "Victor Archies, author of" It (Huangyan Island) belongs to China ",said in a recent interview.

When talking about why he wrote this article, Achilles said that he did it to inform readers that the local newspapers in the Philippines (on the Huangyan Island issue) showed readers false and distorted facts. The legal profession, especially the Congress, supports Aquino for its own interests and political reasons.

Archis said that the Huangyan Island issue does not need internationalization. He suggested that in order to solve the problem, the two sides should sit down and negotiate "like gentlemen and friends".