"North to Guangzhou and Shenzhen" changed to "North to Guangzhou and Shenzhen". What are the slots in the ranking of new first-tier cities?

For a long time, it actually implies the city ranking of "North to Guangzhou and Shenzhen". First of all, consider comprehensive resources, commercial value, urban people's activity and lifestyle. There should be no doubt about the status of Beijing and Shanghai. Why is Beijing ahead of Shanghai? Perhaps Beijing has an advantage over Shanghai as a political and cultural center. There are more universities.

The development of Shenzhen lags far behind that of Guangzhou. After all, Guangzhou is an old first-tier city.

This new ranking is said to have a slot, and I think it is more about the rise of the city's commercial charm. Let's talk about the location changes of Beijing and Shanghai. Shanghai comprehensive ranking? The index is higher than Beijing, although the score is not very high, but as far as the development level of Shanghai is concerned. It is not impossible to catch up with Beijing. In terms of the concentration of commercial resources, urban hub, the activity of urban people, the diversity of lifestyle and the plasticity of the future.

Generally speaking, Beijing's potential development is not as good as Shanghai's. This is also related to Beijing's recent policies and the degree of smog. Beijing's tolerance for talents is actually not as good as Shanghai's. However, the difference between the two is not very big. Each has his own merits. It is more likely that Beijing's talent policy and the activity of urban people are not as good as that of Shanghai. So it caused this gap of 0.93.

There is also a comparison between Shenzhen and Guangzhou. With the increase of net inflow of talents in Shenzhen. Concern for young people is also increasing. This has also created the concentration of commercial resources in Shenzhen, and the activity and future plasticity of urban people will be stronger than that of Guangzhou. But the gap is actually only 0.3. Not obvious. Compared with Beijing and Shanghai, it is still weak.

Simply put, replacing "Northern Guangzhou and Shenzhen" with "Northern Guangzhou and Shenzhen" may be a contribution to new first-tier cities. But if you study the data carefully, the change is not great. Studying these data will reveal some problems.