Look at the following materials: Material 1 (March 3, Xining five years) Zhao said: "Most merchants from all countries are licensed to Beijing and are trapped by the merger house. Usually,

(1) In the mid-Northern Song Dynasty, big businessmen hoarded, manipulated the market, bid up prices for huge profits, and merged small and medium-sized vendors. (1) It's easy to set up the market.

(2) To a certain extent, the phenomenon of hoarding by businessmen is restrained, the market price is controlled, which is conducive to commodity exchange and commodity economy development, and also increases the government's fiscal revenue. However, due to the opposition of conservatives, these measures were eventually abolished. Enlightenment: The government should intervene in the market in a timely and appropriate manner to maintain the normal market order.

(3)D

This topic examines Wang Anshi's market-changing method in the political reform, and his ability to extract information from reading materials and use textbook knowledge. Question (1): According to the summary of the materials, the main sentence reflecting the social phenomenon is determined through reading: "Most of them are trapped by the merged houses and often lose their jobs (that is, they are sold at a reduced price)." Measures can also be obtained according to materials. (2) First of all, the answer to the question "Results" is based on materials. From the second material, we can draw the conclusion that "the hoarding phenomenon of businessmen has been suppressed", and from the third material, we can draw the conclusion that "the market price has been controlled and the government's fiscal revenue has increased"; Then according to the textbook knowledge, I answered, "Because of the opposition of conservatives, these measures were finally abolished." The enlightenment should be answered from the perspective of government intervention in the market. Question (3) We should think about it as a whole: Wang Anshi's financial management is mainly achieved by limiting the privileges of bureaucratic landlords, and its starting point is to adjust the wealth distribution between the state and bureaucratic landlords, with the aim of increasing government revenue, easing contradictions and stabilizing governance.