How can Canadian investment immigrants solve the problem of immigration supervision?

Chinese who applied for Canadian permanent resident status through investment immigration in Canada began to face the problem of how to retain this identity after obtaining a new identity. Because for most Canadian investment immigrants, their main occupation is in China, and their careers are on the rise. Usually, the purpose of applying for Canadian investment immigration is for the education of children and one more choice for domestic assets and careers. After their children can successfully receive education in Canada, they also hope to continue their careers in China. Canadian immigration law stipulates that permanent residents have residence requirements, that is, living in Canada for two years every five years or equivalent to living in Canada; Otherwise, there is a risk of being revoked as a permanent resident of Canada. Conditions that meet the requirements of permanent residents include 1) having lived in Canada for 2 years; Or 2) have lived abroad for 2 years with a spouse with Canadian nationality; Or 3) companies controlled by Canadians and having operations in Canada have been stationed outside Canada for 2 years; Or 4) the spouse is accompanied by a permanent resident of Canada and has been employed by a Canadian company to work outside Canada for 2 years; Or 5) or a combination of the above. According to the above laws, the following are some solutions I have listed for applicants who are going to apply for investment immigration in Canada, so that everyone can find their own solutions according to their own actual conditions: First of all, I want to emphasize four points: 1. Maintaining permanent resident status is an issue that must be considered in combination with family and career development; 2. Make plans early; Don't think that this is a problem that can be solved by spending money; In fact, in most cases, you don't need to spend money. Option 1: After immigrating to Canada, the wife will accompany the children to study in Canada and apply for Canadian citizenship after living for 3 years; Then I will go back to China to live with my husband in China (even if I haven't got a citizen card or a Canadian passport). This applies to parents whose children are about to grow up. The advantage is that once and for all, Mr. Wang no longer needs to live in Canada to maintain his permanent resident status. Option 2: For an applicant whose husband and wife do not intend to live in Canada, one of them, such as his wife, can be employed by a Canadian company for two years. A wife can keep her permanent resident status. At the same time, Mr. Wang Can kept his permanent resident status, because his spouse has permanent resident status and is employed by a Canadian company and works outside Canada. Option 3: Only one of the husband and wife has lived in Canada for 2 years, but has not become a Canadian citizen or is unwilling to become a Canadian citizen, and the children are underage. For the other party, even if it does not meet the residence requirements, it can also request the continuation of permanent resident status on humanitarian grounds. The specific reasons need to be combined with the actual situation of the applicant, such as the need to take care of the elderly at home when they are sick. Relevant supporting documents are required. It should be noted that this option is not given in the maple leaf card extension application form, but in fact you have this option, and you need to attach your explanation and corresponding supporting documents. Option 4: One spouse meets the residence requirements of Canadian permanent residents, while the other spouse does not, and there is no obvious humanitarian reason. Then even if the other party loses the Canadian permanent resident status, the party who retains the permanent resident status can let the other party regain the permanent resident status through husband and wife reunion. Option 5: Avoid customs records and falsely report the detention time through various channels. This is a very dangerous act that we resolutely oppose. It is possible to muddle through, but the case may be overturned by the immigration bureau at any time.