Which do you like best, Go, Chess or Chess?

Personally, I like Go best. There is no doubt that Go is the most fun. In fact, besides the fun of the game itself, liking a game depends on whether you can get positive feedback in the process of playing the game. Generally speaking, the better you are at a game, the more you like to play it and the more motivated you are to learn it. As far as I am concerned, Go is the lowest level, but I still like Go best. I think it's because Go is far more interesting than China Elephant and National Elephant. Why do you think Go is more interesting?

1) There are more unknown fields, which makes people have more desire and fun to explore. In the past, there was a saying in both chess and Go that "there is no chess in all ages" to describe the change of chess-that is, the problem of state space and decision-making space mentioned by some people before. But in fact, there are not so many chess games between China Elephant and National Elephant. If you sort out all the main movements, you will find that they come and go. For example, the Shunbao Bureau in "China Elephant" is almost clearly studied by modern players-the mine has almost been dug up. This leads to a result: those masters, such as grandmasters, will often play draw chess if they play slow and deliberate-that's all; If you play fast chess in order to avoid too many problems of draw, it will lead to rough chess path and often turn into memorizing chess scores. In contrast, the development and change of Go is far more than chess.

2) Richer and more graceful means: The rules of Go are particularly simple, but the hand muscles, moves and skillful hands are extremely rich. In contrast, the tactical means of China elephant are nothing more than catching double, volleying, dodging, disarming, intercepting, leading away, introducing, stumbling, moving and containing. ...

3) The components of logical calculation and understanding feeling are very balanced in the game process: the components of logical calculation account for 90% in the game. Although the consideration of chess is also very important, it is too weak compared with calculation-the imaginary components of power coordination and efficiency can be clearly understood through calculation; However, many parts of Go are unclear, and these unclear parts need to be understood-thickness, excessive means, key points of form and potential, and so on. This mastery of "reason" may be 50% in the strength composition of Go.