What exactly did the Iranian in little shoes say?

Speaking of Iran, I have to mention that their children's films, which have been born for many years, have formed a beautiful landscape with a unique Middle East culture.

Among them, by Majid? "Little Shoes", directed by Makidi, released on 1997, is the brightest pearl. Its significance lies not only in knocking on the door of Oscar for the Middle East film industry with strong Islamic culture, but also in its all-round presentation of the life of Iran, a mysterious country. Although it is based on two children, it can arouse deep reflection and * * * of people of all ages.

When watching the film, the first thing that catches your eye is the simplicity and naturalness of its image style, which can be said to be a unique feature of Iranian films, so that the film can fully show the whole story in details, thus highlighting the central idea more perfectly. Little Shoes shows the meaning of life and highlights the value of human nature through the course of an ordinary event in ordinary people's lives. It is not difficult to find that one of the biggest factors of its success lies in the perfect description of details, which makes such an ordinary event reflect such extraordinary significance.

Around the center of a pair of "little shoes", the whole film unfolds many details, showing the lives of the bottom poor in developing countries. At the beginning of the film, the first "hero" of the film appeared. A pair of pink girls' shoes were being mended, and then a close-up picture was changed. A little boy was mending a pair of women's shoes. What will this look like? The film is intended to make the audience enter the story with questions. Then, the little boy bought a flying cake bigger than his body alone, and then went to buy potatoes, which was treated coldly by the owner. Until he came home, the voice-over was full of quarrels between his mother and others. By this time, I believe that most of the audience can get the information about what happened to the poor at the bottom of society, and can also roughly guess that a series of events later were triggered by these little shoes.

The subsequent plot unfolds with its proper development. For example, two brothers and sisters play opposite each other. My brother Ali went back to the melon shop to look for shoes, and was scolded by his father when he came back. Seeing this, we should fully feel that the social characteristics of "poor children take charge early" are vividly displayed here. Growing up in a relatively superior environment, we may not feel that kind of "bitterness", but we will also recall the helplessness we all faced. Therefore, this is a movie that can arouse people of all ages and all levels of life. However, when we saw that little Ali begged his sister to hide his parents because he lost his shoes, and learned about his mother's illness after he couldn't find his shoes, we all felt sympathy. It was nothing to think about some hardships we encountered when we were growing up. The so-called "suffering" is more thorough and typical in the poor.

Little Ali's home, small single room, baby's crying, and parents' quarrel for their livelihood make it impossible for the two brothers and sisters to have their own comfortable space. They can only lie on the ground and write in their exercise books to discuss how to deal with this event that has become a major event for their family ... The film has so far shown the living environment of the characters through various details. In the last scene of the play, my brother Ali gave his pencil to his sister Sarah. My sister's pencil, the shorter it is cut, the more sad it is, but this simple picture conveys warmth and emotion. At this point, the details begin to fully serve the role. ...

Because of poverty, brother and sister naturally yearn for a better life. In front of the window full of beautiful shoes, Sarah's sister's envy is beyond words. Although they are poor, the two brothers and sisters have not lost the kindness and beauty of human nature of simple working people. When they found that the shoes had been worn on the feet of another girl in the same school, the two brothers and sisters gave up the pursuit of the shoes that belonged to them, just because they regarded her life as poor. Seeing this, I thought of the impetuous metropolis where I live, full of all kinds of interpersonal indifference and estrangement. I often haggle over who won't let it happen from time to time because of a little loss. How many people will sacrifice their due interests to help others? I believe that the optimistic attitude of brothers and sisters towards life is the most infectious part of this film, which perfectly shows that poverty is not terrible. As long as the bottom line of human nature is beautiful, life is full of happy humanistic values.