Job Recruitment Website - Ranking of immigration countries - Britain once colonized almost the whole world. Why are people less annoying now?

Britain once colonized almost the whole world. Why are people less annoying now?

Britain once colonized more than half the world. Why didn't everyone hate him? No contrast, no harm. Britain and Japan are two island countries at the east and west ends of Eurasia, and both have the experience of being colonized by foreign countries. However, we find that many countries in East Asia and Southeast Asia are very disgusted and disgusted with Japan, and some are even full of hatred. However, countries colonized by Britain can continue to be friends after leaving British rule, and some even continue to form alliances with Britain.

What the hell is going on here? Where is the secret that Britain colonized half the world without being hated?

In fact, Britain's former colonies have so far been mainly divided into three categories:

1, immigrant settlement.

This kind of colony is mainly concentrated in today's Five Eyes Alliance. The United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand are originally sparsely populated places. When colonized by Britain, most of the aborigines were killed, but the newcomers were mainly British. Therefore, these British immigrants to the New World are actually related to the original suzerain country and have strong business ties. Naturally, it is impossible to hate your own people.

2. Cow community.

Cow settlements are mainly concentrated in South Asia and Southeast Asia. Before the arrival of Britain, these places had relatively dense populations and relatively complete ethnic and racial systems. In these places, Britain did not implement the barbaric policy of killing, burning and looting the aborigines, but adopted the strategy of divide and rule to win over and attack one faction. These countries will focus most of their hatred on opponents who compete for British sons, rather than hating the British.

Typical examples are that Britain created the contradiction between Hinduism and Islam in the Indian subcontinent, created the Rohingya problem in Myanmar, and provoked the contradiction between Chinese and Malays in Malaysia. What Indians hate most about this magic is not the British who suck marrow from their bones all the year round, but the Muslims who hate India's control with them. I have to say that this trick-or-treating strategy is really clever, so that Britain can suck blood without being photographed.

3. Commercial colonies.

It was actually African colonies that were recently colonized by Britain. African colonies controlled by Britain mainly depended on commerce. After all, before the arrival of the British, there were no decent countries and peoples in Africa. On the one hand, the British helped Africans to build their own country and nation, on the other hand, they also achieved commercial spiritual control by controlling local industries such as mines, oil wells, finance, telecommunications and news.

An obvious example is that from Cairo to Cape Town, under the control of British capital, Africa can live a long-term blood-sucking but still moist life. On the other hand, if Britain withdraws its capital, the country will face economic collapse. Typical South Africa and Zimbabwe, the local people have offended the British and only lent you financial bears, and this country is finished!

Britain's colonization of most of the world has experienced more than 200 years of development and some changes. When the population of the new world is small, kill all the locals and immigrants. Naturally, no one objected. When South Asia and Southeast Asia have a large population, they will provoke internal conflicts and let them compete for the position of British agents, so they have no time to oppose the colonists. Times have changed, and Britain has shifted its control mode to capital control and spiritual control. These countries can live well under the control and blood sucking of foreign capital, and naturally there will be no fierce opposition.

On the other hand, Japan's colonial policies are mainly the first two, which naturally causes great resistance.

Japan once colonized by immigration, which is the famous "colonial group" in Northeast China. However, the population of the northeast colonial group has always been unable to occupy a dominant position, and its time is relatively short, so its role is naturally ignored.

Japan also adopted the way of "stirring dung sticks" to colonize, which is the famous strategy of "controlling China with China". The traitors in China, South Korea, and the Philippines who take refuge in Japan are one species, and may even unite against the Japanese. In this case, Japan's policy failed again.

Today's East and Southeast Asian countries are so impressed by Japan's "Three Lights" policy that when Japan's postwar economy rose and began to adopt the "Goose-shaped model" of capital colonization, everyone had some resistance to Japanese capital, and the effect was not ideal.

Generally speaking, British colonization did not cause much hatred, largely because they took advantage of the situation and used their strategies and strength to disintegrate the resistance of the local people, not because they accumulated virtue and did good deeds.

Colonists are all the same, whether it is the initial "Three Lights" or the later capital colonization with political blackmail, it should be condemned.