How do Korean, Korean, Japanese and Vietnamese history books describe China?

Which Japanese history textbook have you read that Japan distorts the facts? If you haven't seen it, you have no right to speak!

I have read eight sets of Japanese history textbooks and studied them carefully.

Japan has no distorted history.

Especially for the ancient history of China, the Japanese have no reason to distort it.

On the contrary, the Japanese account of China is consistent with that of China.

Moreover, Japanese high school history has a deep research on the history of China.

For example, the study of the history of the Han dynasty is the focus of the Japanese college entrance examination! The descriptions of the Han Dynasty in China are consistent, but there are differences in a few dynasties.

The most typical is the description of Bohai State. Japan and South Korea agree that Bohai is the successor of Koguryo.

It is believed that the Bohai Sea was established by Koguryo immigrants, claiming to be Koguryo's successor country, and all its nationals returned to the Korean peninsula after their national subjugation, so it is an important part of Korean history.

I only studied Japan, South Korea, North Korea and Vietnam.

Few people can speak so many foreign languages.

One person can't finish learning.

But some people just listen to the mainland media, and such people are just frogs in the well.