How to treat political correctness

Political correctness is a technical term in modern thought and policy research. Broadly speaking, it refers to catering to mainstream values, morality and public opinion regardless of objective facts in speech and behavior. It can also refer to those who ignore the facts and stand at the moral high ground to fully support mainstream values.

Political correctness in western values refers to concealing true thoughts and objective facts against one's will in political stance, not "offending" ethnic minorities and vulnerable groups in words, policies and behaviors, taking "special care" (privilege) of vulnerable groups, ignoring the normal needs of powerful groups and blindly asking them to be patient, tolerant, give in and pay. American federal laws no longer use "discriminatory words" such as "﹝Oriental﹞" and "black", but instead use "Asian" and "African-American" respectively. In addition to these two titles, Spanish speakers, Eskimos and Indians will be replaced by Spanish-speaking Americans, Alaska natives and Native Americans respectively.

Supporters of political correctness tend to use "inclusive language" and "civilization" to describe political correctness. Opponents believe that political correctness is a derogatory term, similar to hypocrisy, over-sensitivity and haggle over every ounce.

Political correctness originated from a judicial concept in the United States in the19th century, which mainly refers to political correctness in judicial language, that is, it conforms to judicial provisions or laws and constitutions. However, in the 1980s, this judicial idea gradually evolved into a "statement in line with public opinion". In other words, in daily conversation, anything that does not conform to the public opinion of the dominant public is regarded as "politically incorrect".

Political correctness is not limited to the national political level, but also exists in larger social institutions. It takes the knowledge that speech affects ideas as the basic theoretical premise and clear political ideas as the basic criterion, and directly interferes with people's ideas in this social group.

Whether it is a socialist country or a non-socialist country, political correctness is particularly important for the following people:

1, employees of official or non-governmental propaganda organizations.

2, government officials, parliamentarians, politicians, teachers and other participants in public affairs, managers or influential people.

One of the biggest faults of political correctness is to ignore the facts and provide "special care" to the vulnerable groups. Everything advocated by the disadvantaged groups is considered to be "correct" and "feasible". No matter what negative consequences it will bring to society, we must support all the views and speeches of the disadvantaged groups. As long as the three slogans of equality, pluralism and freedom are put forward, we must support and tolerate them.

However, in fact, equality and freedom are aimed at the disadvantaged groups, and they are not so friendly to the powerful groups. For example, freedom of speech is limited to vulnerable groups. Once the strong group disagrees with the views of the weak group, it is not protected by freedom of speech. On the contrary, they are likely to be jailed or even bankrupt because his remarks seem to "discriminate" against the disadvantaged groups.

Many people envy all kinds of things in the United States, among which "freedom of speech" in the United States is often mentioned, as if you can say whatever you want and speak freely in the United States. However, it seems that the fact is not so beautiful. Anyone who knows something about America knows that in America, as long as you are not talking to yourself, there is a red line of "political correctness" in front of your freedom of speech. From the president to the new immigrants, political correctness is a hidden rule that must be observed.

American politics correctly emphasizes the equality of people in race, gender and religion, and it seems that it should not be opposed, but why do many people in the United States have extreme antipathy to the Democratic Party full of political correctness? Are they all white supremacy people, anarchists, religious fundamentalists and male chauvinists who want to oppose the government? This is naturally not the real reason. The real reason why people dislike political correctness lies in two points: 1, and the emphasis on political correctness has reached the degree of overcorrection; Political correctness is used by politicians as a tool to attract votes.

The supporters of western political correctness are leftists (leftists), while those who oppose political correctness are Rightists (Rightists). The difference between them is obvious. The former pays attention to "everything", while the latter often adds a "but". When a person says: all races are equal, all blacks can't be offended, no matter what they are, we must give them something better. Another person said: However, if black students' grades are really poor, then we can't force them to recruit as many students as Asian students. Who is left and who is right is clear at a glance.

There is a western proverb: "People who don't believe in the left wing have no conscience when they are young, and those who believe in liberalization have no brains when they are mature."

"Freedom comes at a price", which has a deeper meaning than it seems. In the eyes of many people, freedom is a state of freedom, which does not involve any cost, expense and other issues, and this is obviously all wet. Freedom is a luxury that needs to be acquired at a high price, and these costs include that the world has become a disorderly society, and the world is full of disputes and chaos. There is never absolute freedom in this world. Unlimited freedom is not willful, but unreasonable.

Phenomenon analysis

black people

In the United States, a white man and a black man died in the same situation because of excessive law enforcement by the police. The former will not cause any commotion, while the latter will definitely lead to a parade. The compensation (from the government and society) received by the families of the deceased in the former is often lower than that of the latter. So, isn't this phenomenon politically correct? Isn't it reverse discrimination? More statistics show that among the police accused of "excessive law enforcement against blacks", the proportion of whites is not significantly higher than that of blacks.

If you pay attention to Hollywood movies, you will find that directors generally dare not easily portray black people as negative images. In fact, whether it is the black lawyer in The Philadelphia Story or the black cellmate in The Shawshank Redemption, the black always represents the image of courage, justice and wisdom. From this small detail, we can see the fear of Hollywood directors in shaping the black image. No one wants to get into trouble like Lott.

A politically correct culture cannot solve problems, but can only avoid them. The black crime rate remains high, and it will not change because all black people are portrayed as good people in your movies.

gender

In 20 13, California Senate and House of Representatives deliberated and passed [AB 1266 Bill], which is the famous toilet bill. This bill stipulates that in California schools, students can choose dressing rooms, bathrooms and toilets according to their gender. In other words, no matter whether I am a man, a woman or a transgender, as long as I think I am a woman, I can go to the ladies' room, the ladies' bathroom and the ladies' locker room (even if there is no transsexuality).

Imagine that this bill is aimed at protecting gender equality, but will it harm the interests of others? There is no doubt that the passage of this bill will greatly increase the probability of students encountering sexual crimes. There are countless such cases. In order to eliminate gender discrimination in language and improve gender inclusion, Nebraska in the United States requires schools to stop using words such as boys and girls, and in Northern Europe, it is also forbidden to use gender words such as men, women, him and her.

Gender equality should be to achieve maximum equality in facing up to the real differences between men and women. The political right believes that asexuality equals gender equality, completely ignoring the objective differences between men and women, and fundamentally destroying the concept of gender itself. Instead of working hard in places that really benefit men and women, we should focus on social asexuality and freedom of dress for men and women. This is called equality, freedom, pluralism and tolerance.

Male bones are stronger, muscle fibers are more, and androgen brings sharp, square and rigid facial features and a tall and firm figure; Women have a slender skeleton, flexible and slender muscle fibers, and estrogen brings smooth, soft and delicate facial features and graceful figure. Even if there is too much estrogen, it will lead to boys and girls; Too much androgen leads to masculinity of girls. But it's hard to look different from the real opposite sex. If it is really done, the content of foreign hormones in the body can already reach the degree of degeneration.

All of the above determine that the aesthetic images of men and women are different, just like pants can be worn by both men and women, but women's pants are curved and men's pants are loose and comfortable; Skirts also have men's skirts, but not as short and fluffy as women's skirts; Both men and women can have long hair and short hair, but men's short hair/long hair and women's short hair/long hair are completely different.

Faced with a transvestite, the political right will say: "Men and women are free to dress, and clothes and hairstyles are not exclusive to men/women, and others have no right to interfere." A true pluralistic egalitarian will say, "transgender people have the freedom to dress up, and gender should not be based only on physiology, and others have no right to interfere." No matter how politically correct it is to advocate freedom of dressing, no matter how fashionable it is to advocate neutrality and asexuality, aesthetics always sends people to split the same clothes and hairstyles in two. It is true that it is personal freedom for transgender people to wear what they want, and others have no right to interfere. The political right, on the other hand, uses the wind of equal rights for transgender people to destroy the gender concept from the root. This kind of excessive freedom and excessive emphasis on political correctness will inevitably lead to overcorrection and may eventually lead to social chaos.

refugee

In Europe, America and Northern Europe, Muslim refugees now sexually abuse women. According to the common sense of civilized society, crime should be punished, which is a very simple thing. The important role of law is to curb crime through judgment and punishment. But once political correctness is involved, the same crime will no longer be punished, because criminals are the group that political correctness should protect.

Well, politically correct politicians are satisfied, and the police certainly save trouble. It's great that Muslim refugees can enjoy women for free. Isn't this a happy thing? But what is not lost? Who will wipe away the blood and tears of those women, and who will soothe their spiritual wounds? Parents' anger and helplessness, who can give a statement?

The left-wing female politician in Mannheim and three female middle school students in Kassel were both sexually assaulted by refugees, but they both chose silence first because they didn't want to discredit the refugees. Denmark/Kloc-A 0/7-year-old girl resisted the rape of refugees and was investigated by the judicial authorities and paid a fine. Because she didn't respect refugees, the refugee rapist was exempted from prosecution and the fine was used to compensate the refugee rapist. Norwegian male politician was raped by a male refugee while volunteering in a refugee camp. The refugee was later sentenced by the court to four and a half years' imprisonment and will be repatriated. The raped male politician said: I'm sorry, you were sent back for raping me; /kloc-a 0/3-year-old Russian girl was gang-raped by refugees in Germany for 30 hours. German police said: girls have sex voluntarily, there is no kidnapping and rape, girls are voluntary, and suspects may not know the actual age of girls.

The above examples all prove how badly the West has been brainwashed by politics, and the privilege of refugees has plunged the West into chaos.