What impact has such a strict family planning policy had?

Looking around the world, the disadvantage of insufficient population in developed countries such as Europe, America and Japan has emerged, which seriously hinders economic development.

In addition to encouraging fertility at home, European and American countries have also formulated loose immigration policies with the aim of giving blood transfusion to their own population. However, the drawbacks of the loose immigration policy are also exposed, which makes Europe and the United States miserable for immigrants.

We all know that the loss of Japanese economy in the past 20 years is not only related to politics and policies, but also the contribution of a small population.

Look at China. In 1950s and 1960s, there was a baby boom in China, and the population increased explosively compared with that before liberation. As a result, China gradually implemented family planning in the 1970s, and it was a little stricter. In the 1980 s, only one child was advocated, but actually one child was allowed. Rural hukou can give birth to a girl and then give birth to a second child in eight years. If you have a boy, you will not be allowed to have one.

Under such a high-pressure policy, the birth rate in China has dropped. After 30 years of development, the only child born in 1980s has begun to step into the forefront of society, and the problems have also been exposed. Our most intuitive thing is the shortage of labor.

It is a long process for the population problem to change from quantitative to qualitative. No one knows what will happen in the future, and it is often impossible to reverse the situation immediately after it happens. So many people are worried about the problem of insufficient population in China.

Decades of family planning policy has effectively curbed the population explosion in China, and one child for a couple has contributed to the economic development of China. It can be said that China's current economic development and improvement of living standards cannot be separated from the policy of "one couple and one child" for decades.

But things split in two, and the side effects of "one couple and one child" are also highlighted.

Now a couple faces four old people, not to mention whether they can support them materially. From a spiritual point of view, they must be willing to do more things within their power. The biggest side effect of a couple having a child is that there are many families in China who have lost their children, and the children have left before they are old. This is the most terrible thing for couples with one child. They lived worse than death in their later years, living with others. If people are gone, they really can't live.